Credence goods regulation and competition
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 6

Credence goods – regulation and competition PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 105 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Credence goods – regulation and competition. David Stallibrass | Director, Services and Public Markets UCL / HKU Conference | March 2011. A credence spectrum. My job. Medical advice. Barristers. Education. Experience good. Credence good. Medical procedures. Home repairs. Audit.

Download Presentation

Credence goods – regulation and competition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Credence goods regulation and competition

Credence goods – regulation and competition

David Stallibrass | Director, Services and Public Markets

UCL / HKU Conference | March 2011


A credence spectrum

A credence spectrum

My job

Medical

advice

Barristers

Education

Experience good

Credence good

Medical procedures

Home repairs

Audit

Vitamins

Primarily a consumerproblem:

Asymmetric information

Mitigated by

brand power

Dominance?

Mitigated by regulation

Protectionism?


Political economy

Political economy

Role of competition authority to represent those who do not exist yet


Three examples

Three examples

Focus of professional bodies is often on high entry barriers and raising standards  exacerbates competition problem


Information revolution

Information revolution

Alternative approach: mitigate underlying information asymmetry by actively supporting transparency and consumer feedback

3: Challenge firms and professionals to compete on quality and know their customer

1: Open up performance and complaints data

2: Commit not to make defamation claims

Often resisted by professional bodies

 evidence of losing their focus?

Consumers help each other to choose service provider right for them

Firms and professionals have incentive and knowledge to improve their offering


Conclusion

Conclusion


  • Login