Instrumental Behaviors Following Test Administration and Interpretation: Exploration Validity of the...
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

Presented by: Ana AriasAlheli Miranda Julia Baird Lily Soltero PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 71 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Instrumental Behaviors Following Test Administration and Interpretation: Exploration Validity of the Strong Interest Inventory. Presented by: Ana AriasAlheli Miranda Julia Baird Lily Soltero. Previous research. Purpose. Participants.

Download Presentation

Presented by: Ana AriasAlheli Miranda Julia Baird Lily Soltero

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Presented by ana arias alheli miranda julia baird lily soltero

Instrumental Behaviors Following Test Administration and Interpretation: Exploration Validity of the Strong Interest Inventory

Presented by:

Ana AriasAlheli Miranda

Julia Baird Lily Soltero


Previous research

Previous research


Purpose

Purpose


Participants

Participants

  • Introductory Psychology students which were awarded extra credit points

  • Initially, there were 157 students (women= 94, men= 63)

  • One year later when the participants were contacted to follow-up there were 94 students (women= 53, men= 41)


Participants cont d

Participants cont’d

  • To determine if the students who were contacted were similar to those who could not be contacted, the demographic characteristics were compared.

  • Findings: class distribution and GPA very similar

  • In response to “the importance of having a definite career plan at this time”- both groups responded that it was somewhat or very important ( 68.5% follow-up participants and 64.1% for non-participants )


Final experimental and contrast samples

SII Experimental Group

45.7% finding interesting careers

26.2% financial considerations

18.2% self discovery

Contrast Group

42.2% finding interesting careers

19.7% financial considerations

25.2% self discovery

*no statistical differences

Final Experimental and Contrast Samples


Data collection

Phase 1, SII was administered and 2 weeks later interpreted

Phase 2, one year later participants were surveyed by telephone to collect criterion data

Data Collection


Self reported career exploration behaviors

Self-Reported Career Exploration Behaviors

  • 14 yes-no items were constructed concerning academic and non-academic career exploration behaviors

  • 7 items concerning campus career exploration services (use of the Career Development Center)

  • 7 items concerning career exploration that may occur on or of campus (informal conversation with friends about careers)


Five factors measured

Five Factors Measured

  • Discussion/ Reading

  • Experiential Information Seeking

  • Career Counselling

  • Vocational Testing

  • Individual Information Seeking


Results

Results

  • Experimental group engaged in more instrumental information seeking behaviors

  • Students pattern of activities suggest that the Strong Interest Inventory had an impact on career exploration behaviors


Critical review

Critical Review

Points of Interest

  • SII group followed up after one year

  • No gender differences in exploratory validity

  • Differences between SII experimental group and control group in career exploration preferences

  • A yes/no response technique was used in participating in instrumental behaviors


Critical review cont d

Critical Review cont’d

Areas of Disagreement

  • Oliver and Spokane (1983) argue that classroom group intervention seem to be more beneficial than individual strategies

  • Author focuses on SII and tests leading students to seek further career exploration/ should focus more on results of tests


  • Login