1 / 9

USC-CSE Annual Research Review Los Angeles, CA March 16, 2004

USC-CSE Annual Research Review Los Angeles, CA March 16, 2004. Working Group Meeting Report. Ricardo Valerdi – USC Center for Software Engineering. COSYSMO Workshop Agenda. Morning (8:00 AM – noon) Brief Overview of COSYSMO and Delphi R2 results

lzellmer
Download Presentation

USC-CSE Annual Research Review Los Angeles, CA March 16, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. USC-CSE Annual Research Review Los Angeles, CA March 16, 2004 Working Group Meeting Report Ricardo Valerdi – USC Center for Software Engineering

  2. COSYSMO Workshop Agenda Morning (8:00 AM – noon) Brief Overview of COSYSMO and Delphi R2 results Updates on action items from October 2003 meeting Open Issues on driver definitions Preliminary Results from exploratory dataset Afternoon (1:00 PM – 5:00 PM) myCOSYSMO update Sizing revisited Life cycle extensions of the model Other open issues & data collection Action items

  3. COSYSMO Introduction • Parametric model to estimate system engineering costs • Includes 4 size & 14 cost drivers • Covers full system engineering lifecycle • Developed with USC-CSE Corporate Affiliate and INCOSE participation Conceptualize Operate, Maintain, or Enhance Replace or Dismantle Transition to Operation Oper Test & Eval Develop

  4. Action Items from October ‘03 • Need to develop a better way to count requirements • Follow up with Delphi respondents that were outliers • Normalize the Delphi responses to Nominal # of System Requirements • Update Process Capability driver • Add “Extra High” ratings to the drivers that contain only 3 rating levels • Migration complexity • # and diversity of Installations/Platforms

  5. Action Items from Working Group Meeting • Subgroups created to work on • Life cycle extensions (volatility and reuse) • EIA 632 activities included in the model • Insert ISO 15504 and CMM/CMMI equivalence (mapping) in the Process Capability Driver • Create a Key Process Areas questionnaire • Need a scope definitions of what an “organization” means • Reduce the Migration Complexity driver from 5 viewpoints to 2 • Provide guidance on drivers with multiple viewpoints • Remove the words “shall” and “will” from the # of System Requirements driver; instead use the requirements verification matrix for sizing • Develop a block diagram of the model envisioned architecture • Prepare for Delphi Round 3 • Prepare for next working group meeting: July 28th & 29th Keystone, PSM Users’ Group Conference

  6. COSYSMO Stakeholders

  7. USC/Raytheon myCOSYSMO* *Developed by Gary Thomas at Raytheon Garland

  8. Attendees (19) John Rieff (Raytheon) Gary Thomas (Raytheon) George Friedman (USC) Barry Boehm (USC) Merrill Palmer (BAE Systems) Cheryl Jones (Army) Gunter Daley (L-3 Comm) Don Reifer (USC) Jo Ann Lane (USC) Garry Roedler (Lockheed Martin) Paul Frenz (General Dynamics) John Starita (General Dynamics) Willie Williams (Boeing) Marilee Wheaton(Aerospace) Paul Mohlman (Aerospace) Jesal Bhuta (USC) Ricardo Valerdi (USC) Via telecon Chris Miller (SPC) Roger Shepherd (Raytheon)

  9. Questions or Comments? Dr. Barry Boehm boehm@sunset.usc.edu Ricardo Valerdi rvalerdi@sunset.usc.edu Website http://www.valerdi.com/cosysmo

More Related