Academic
Download
1 / 50

Academic Leadership R et r e at - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 96 Views
  • Uploaded on

Academic Leadership R et r e at. Augus t 28 , 2013. 1. Journey to the Top 25. Students. § We are a student-focused university § How we treat our students is important § One Stop. J u n e B o ar d of Tr ustees. § 6% Tuition Increase § 5% Raise Pool – 3 r d year in a row

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Academic Leadership R et r e at' - lynton


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

AcademicLeadership Retreat

August 28, 2013

1


Journey totheTop 25


Students

§We are a student-focuseduniversity

§Howwetreatour studentsis important

§OneStop


J u n e b o ar d of tr ustees
June Boardof Trustees

§6%Tuition Increase

§5%RaisePool–3rd yearin a row

§Fee Increases

§Transfer streetstouniversity


Governor’s ReviewofHigherEducation

§Access

§Quality

§Preparing students forcareers


Branding communications
Branding &Communications


Branding communications1
Branding &Communications

§Branding contributesto success

§Consistencyisessential

§Goodstoriesreinforcethe brand and everyonebenefits

§Buy-in iscritical


Branding communications2
Branding &Communications

  • §We are strategiccommunicators

  • Branding providesframework

  • Work withcampuspartners

  • Usedatatomake decisions

  • Branding isa continualprocess


Branding &Communications


Development

$92,402,645raised

32,540 donors

10


DevelopmentPriorities

SupporttheJourney totheTop 25

§Chairs, professorships,and facultyawards

§Scholarshipsand Fellowships

§CollegePriorities

§Deans,DepartmentHeadsvital tofundraising


Athletics
Athletics

§Notmostimportant, butmostvisible

§Clean,successfulprogram iscritical

§Mosttoppublicuniversitiessucceedin both

§Working towardbetterfinancial model


Athletics1
Athletics

§Suspended$6 million/year ofsupport-- no impacton current commitments

§Athleticsfundsfacilities&utilities–budgetreserveinadequate

§80%ofstudentathletespayout-of-statetuition

§UTMand UTCeachinvest~$5million annually

§38 ofTop 50publicstransfer moneytoathletics


Athletics2
Athletics

  • §Academicsuccess

  • Recordperformance–studentathletes3.05+GPA

  • 58%ofstudentathletes3.0 GPA or higher

  • 115 studentathleteson Dean’s List

  • Herman Lathers–Chancellor’s Citationfor Extraordinary CommunityService


New tuition model
NewTuition Model

§Take 15,graduatein 4

§Appliestonewundergraduatesin Fall2013

§Full-timestudentspayfor 15 hours

§Noadditionalcostfor 15+hours

§Expectation–limittuitionincreasesto3% annuallyfor threeyearsfor Classof2017


AverageNetPrice ofTuition

$6,000.00

$3,700.00

$3,752.00

$4,000.00

$2,945.00

$2,000.00

$-­‐

$(2,000.00)

$(4,000.00)

$(6,000.00)

$(5,619.00)

$(8,000.00)

Second QuarKle ($46,516 -­‐

$95,444)

Third QuarKle ($95,445 -­‐

$151,369)

Fourth QuarKle ($151,370 -­‐

$1,506,000)

BoIomQuarKle ($0 -­‐ $46,515)


In-StateTuition atFour-YearSchools

FY2012-2013

A comparisonofundergraduate in-­‐statemaintenanceandmandatoryfees between four-­‐ year highereducaKoninsKtuKonsinTennessee.

Sortedby MandatoryFees

Sortedby TotalFees

Mandatory Fees

MandatoryUG Maint.

Fees Fees*

$ from UTK

InsKtuKon

InsKtuKon

Total

MiddleTennessee

1,594

UT ChaIanooga

1,490

UT Knoxville

1,290

University ofMemphis

1,256

AusKnPeay

1,224

Tennessee Tech

1,200

UT MarKn

1,103

EastTennessee

1,075

Tennessee State

930

*Higherthan UT Knoxville

TBRschoolsbasedon15 credit hourseach semester

Source– Tennessee Higher EducaKonCommission


Student debt
StudentDebt

Lessthan $21,000

Average UT student debt (2012-13):

UT studentswith NOdebt: Average expenses:

51%

Lessthan $26,000/year

Mostscholarshipsexpire:

4 years


We Remain a Great Value

§Great value

§Futureoftuitionincreases

§Financial burdenon our students

§Nettuitionislow


Journey tothe Top25

20


UTKPosition


Progr e ss
Progress

§1 stayed same – Met our goal

§8Metricsimproved

§1 decreased

§2MetricsTBD


Freshman RetentionRate

1st to 2nd YearRetention Rate; 2002-2011 Freshmen CohortYears

88

86.2%

86

84.6%

84.5%

84.0%

83.8%

83.6%

84

81.7%

82

79.6%

80

78%

77.8%

78

76

74

72

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011


Freshman retention rate
Freshman RetentionRate

§Evengreatplayershave a coach

§We want all of our students to succeed and completetheirdegrees


GraduationRates

Four,Fiveand SixYearGraduationRates

FallCohorts1999 - 2008

80%

68.0%

66.1%

63.2%

60.6%

60.5%

70%

59.8%

60.1%

57.8%

6.0%

4.6%

57.2%

4.7%

60%

4.7%

5.1%

5.3%

5.1%

4.7%

5.1%

50%

25.3%

25.8%

24.8%

24.3%

25.2%

24.2%

24.7%

23.7%

23.4%

40%

30%

20%

40.0%

39.0%

36.7%

35.7%

33.7%

31.2%

30.6%

30.6%

30.0%

29.4%

28.7%

10%

0%

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003 2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

FallCohortYears

Preliminary

FOUR-­‐YEAR

FIVE-­‐YEAR

SIX-­‐YEAR

25


Graduates

2011-2012Academic Year

8000

6,744

7000

6000

2205

4,865

5000

4,094

3,720

954

4000

3,001

1370

3000

2,158

2,070

2047

826

1,880

1,499

4539

1,248

2000

3911

768

462

556

320

2724

540

132

2146

1000

1696

1673

1514

1312

1116

959

729

39

0

Bachelor's

Graduate/Professional

26


Graduate degrees
GraduateDegrees

2500

2000

319

277

258

270

1500

PhD

1000

1835

1807

1726

1845

Masters and Professional

500

0

2010

2011

2012

2013


Research m e tri c s
Research Metrics


Research scholarship
Research/Scholarship

§Governor’s Chairs

§NationalAcademyofScience

§NationalAcademyofEngineering

§Bredesen Center

§Centerfor theHumanities

§Anderson Center

for Entrepreneurship


Faculty and staff m e tri c s
Facultyand Staff Metrics

30


Faculty

Average AssistantProfessorSalary; Fall2012

$100

AspiraKon

Target

Peer

$95

$90

$85

$80

$75

$70

$65

$60

$55

$50

$73


Faculty

Average Associate ProfessorSalary, Fall2012

$120

AspiraKon

Target

Peer

$110

UTK

up 1 position

since 2011

$100

$90

$80

$70

$60

$50

$86


Faculty

Average FullProfessorSalary, Fall2012

$190

AspiraKon

Target

Peer

$170

UTK up 1 position since 2011

$150

$130

$110

$90

$70

$50

$121


Faculty and staff
Facultyand Staff

§Raisessince2011 –16% compounded (5%peryear)

§$52M in salariessince2011

§Permanent fundingstays withincollege

34


Faculty and staff acco m pl i sh m ents
Facultyand Staff Accomplishments

§Endowed37chairs, professorships,and faculty awards

§Implementedcareerpathsfor lecturers

§Completeda benchmarking compensationstudy

§Performance-basedmeritpay

35


Top25InfrastructureProgress

Projectsunderway üStudentUnion üStrongHall üResidenceHall üLandscape Master Plan

Recently completed

üNatalie Haslam MusicCenter

üJohn D. Tickle EngineeringBuilding

üHumanitiesand Social Sciences

üGreveHall

üBrehm Animal Science

and FoodScienceBuildings

36


To p 2 5 inv e s t m e n ts
Top25Investments

  • §$10.4Minvestedin thepast3 years

  • StrategicInstructional Fund

  • Research

  • Relievebottleneckcourses

  • FacultyHires

  • Developmentand Alumni

  • Advising

  • FirstYearand Transition Programs

–ViceChancellorfor Diversity

37



Civility diversity citizenship
Civility/Diversity/Citizenship

§Core value

§Everyone’s responsibility

§Criticaltoachieving excellence

§ViceChancellorfor Diversity



Productive partnerships
ProductivePartnerships


Fy 2013 14 budget
FY2013-14Budget

§$6.9M formula phase-in

§$7.4M appropriationimprovements

§$3.0M Collegeof Engineering

§$1.2M fringe benefit funding

§$2.6M1.5%salaryincrease(55%)

$21.1M proposed funding

§$24M steam plant

§$6M deferred maintenance

§$20 million ($5m/year x 4 years) for

a successful NSF Super Computer Proposal


FY2012-13ProposedUsesofRevenues

FY2013-­‐14 Budget

Inmillions

Fixedcosts,key iniKaKves,andstrategic investments

Salaryplan

$11.9

CollegeofEngineering

$ 3.0

Systems charge increase/ recalibraKon

$ 1.9

Hires /promoKons/ladders

$ 1.1

Facultystartupcommitments

$ 0.8

ContractescalaKons&new buildingcosts

$ 1.4

Scholarshipcommitments

$ 4.7

Top25/academic reinvestments

$ 4.3

Benefits + Grad HealthInsurance

$ 1.6

Waivers /Summer /DE/Shares

$ 6.0


Finances
Finances

§Why are budgetstight?

–Tuition increasesalsocostusmore money

–Raises$52M

–Construction/Renovation

–StrategicTop 25 investments

–MissedUGenrollmentprojectionlastyear

–GraduateFellowships($12M)


Plan going forward
Plan GoingForward

§Tuition primary revenuesource

§15-4 isbeingimplemented

§UG Enrollment goal=21,500, Fall 2014

§Creativeproposalstothestate


Plan going forward1
Plan GoingForward

§Howcan webemore confidentin year-to-

yearfunding?

§Why isathleticfundingmodelchanging?



Challenges1
Challenges

§Board ofTrustees–What dofacultydo?

Howmuchdotheyteach?

§What istheroleofhighereducation?

§Howcan thecostofa degreebereduced?

–Increaseproductivity?Cutcosts?

§Politicalchallenges…


Future
Future

§We have setour vision

§We have madesignificantprogress

§ButI needyourcontinuingadvice, support,and help



ad