Tumbling walls building bridges
Download
1 / 32

Tumbling Walls & Building Bridges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 133 Views
  • Uploaded on

Steps towards a Culture Web. Tumbling Walls & Building Bridges. Interoperability: tearing down the walls between collections. Musea have increasingly nice websites But: most of them are driven by stand-alone collection databases

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Tumbling Walls & Building Bridges' - lynn


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Tumbling walls building bridges

Steps towards a Culture Web

Tumbling Walls & Building Bridges


Interoperability tearing down the walls between collections
Interoperability: tearing down the walls between collections

  • Musea have increasingly nice websites

  • But: most of them are driven by stand-alone collection databases

  • Data is isolated, both syntactically and semantically

  • If users can do cross-collection search, the individual collections become more valuable!


The web open documents and links
The Web: “open” documents and links

URL

URL

Web link


The semantic web open data and links
The Semantic Web: “open” data and links

Painting

“Green Stripe (Mme Matisse)”

Royal Museum of Fine Arts, Copenhagen

Painter

“Henri Matisse”

Getty ULAN

creator

Dublin Core

URL

URL

Web link


Principle 1 semantic annotation
Principle 1: semantic annotation

Description of web objects with “concepts” from a shared vocabulary


Principle 2 semantic search

Search for objects which are linked via concepts (semantic link)

Use the type of semantic link to provide meaningful presentation of the search results

Principle 2: semantic search

Query

“Paris”

Paris

PartOf

Montmartre


Principle 3 vocabulary alignment

AAT style/period link)

Edo (Japanese period)

Tokugawa

SVCN period

Edo

SVCN is local in-house

ethnology thesaurus

AAT is Getty’s

Art & Architecture Thesaurus

Principle 3: vocabulary alignment

“Tokugawa”


The myth of a unified vocabulary
The myth of a unified vocabulary link)

  • In large virtual collections there are always multiple vocabularies

    • In multiple languages

  • Every vocabulary has its own perspective

    • You can’t just merge them

  • But you can use vocabularies jointly by defining a limited set of links

    • “Vocabulary alignment”

  • It is surprising what you can do with just a few links


Http e culture multimedian nl
http://e-culture.multimedian.nl link)

Part of the Dutch national MultimediaN project

CWI, VU, UvA, DEN, ICNAlia Amin, Lora Aroyo Mark van Assem, Victor de Boer Lynda Hardman Michiel Hildebrand, Laura Hollink Marco de Niet, Borys Omelayenko Marie-France van Orsouw Jacco van Ossenbruggen Guus Schreiber, Jos Taekema Annemiek Teesing, Anna Tordai Jan Wielemaker, Bob Wielinga

Artchive.comRijksmuseum Amsterdam Dutch ethnology musea (Amsterdam, Leiden)

National Library (Bibliopolis)



From metadata to semantic metadata
From metadata to link)semantic metadata



Resulting semantic annotation rendered as html with rdfa
Resulting semantic annotation link)(rendered as HTML with RDFa)


Levels of interoperability
Levels of interoperability link)

  • Syntactic interoperability

    • using data formats that you can share

    • XML family is the preferred option

  • Semantic interoperability

    • How to share meaning / concepts

    • Technology for finding and representing semantic links


Term disambiguation is key issue in semantic search
Term disambiguation is key issue in semantic search link)

  • Post-query

    • Sort search results based on different meanings of the search term

    • Mimics Google-type search

  • Pre-query

    • Ask user to disambiguate by displaying list of possible meanings

    • Interface is more complex, but more search functionality can be offered



Faceted pre query
Faceted (pre query) link)

Faceted

search


skos link)


  • v link)



Learning alignments
Learning alignments link)

  • Learning relations between art styles in AAT and artists in ULAN through NLP of art historic texts

    • “Who are Impressionist painters?”


Perspectives
Perspectives link)

  • Basic Semantic Web technology is ready for deployment

  • Web 2.0 facilities fit well:

    • Involving community experts in annotation

    • Personalization, myArt

  • Social barriers have to be overcome!

    • “open door” policy

    • Involvement of general public => issues of “quality”


Semantic interoperability
Semantic interoperability link)

  • Large, smart web “mash ups”, combining:

    • Data: images, metadata & encyclopaedic knowledge (gazetteers, thesauri, Wikipedia, …)

    • Visualisations: maps, timelines, social networks, …

  • Data too diverse for a traditional database approach

    • fixed schemas will not work

    • data includes relational data, XML text, images, video, …

  • Need to link different data sources together

    • focus on light weight, heuristic approaches

    • reusing as much as possible (web standards)

  • Need new interfaces and search paradigms

    • need to find relations between pieces of information

    • need to organize (cluster/rank/filter) the many relations we will find


Caveats for museum software
Caveats for museum software link)

  • Be wary of Flash

    • Accessibility

  • Make sure you can connect others and other can connect to you

    • “Don’t buy software which does not support standard open API’s”

  • Export facilities to common formats (XML, …)


Semantic web myths
Semantic Web Myths link)*)

  • Sem Web = Artificial Intelligence on the Web

  • Relies on centrally controlled ontologies for “meaning”

    • as opposed to a democratic, bottom-up control of terms

  • One has to manually add metadata to all Web pages, relational databases, XML data, etc to use it

  • It is just ugly XML

  • One has to learn formal logic, knowledge representation, description logic, etc.

  • An academic project, of no interest for industry

*) Adapted from a slide by Frank van Harmelen, panel WWW2006


ad