1 / 14

Heading

Heading. EUROISLANDS – some outsider observations. Jouko Kinnunen Statistics and Research Åland 7 October 2011. First impressions. Extensive work , voluminous reports A lot of effort put into data gathering and processing

lyndon
Download Presentation

Heading

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Heading EUROISLANDS – some outsider observations Jouko Kinnunen Statistics and Research Åland 7 October 2011

  2. First impressions • Extensive work, voluminousreports • A lotofeffortputinto data gathering and processing • Relies on earlier policy studies and evaluations – as required in terms ofreference • Put a lotof (toomuch?) efforts in creatingnew waysofaggregating and presenting EU-widearchipelago data

  3. Descriptionof the islands • General picture(a viewshared by the EU bodies?): remote, peripheral, small, vulnerable, notattractiveto new firms or inhabitants • Cannotcompetewithcontinental Metropolitan European Growth Areas (MEGAs) – lack of agglomeration economies, varietyofsupply etc. • On averageloweducationalcontentof human capital (Nordic islandsexception) • Accessibility and transport costs a common problem

  4. But… • A lotof variation in the conditionsof the islands: someisland regions havehigher GDP per capita than EU27 average (including Åland) • The diversityof the successofislandsbegs for explanations: • Åland: tax free • Shetland: oilproduction • Islas Baleares, Cyprus: tourism and other services • Channel Islands: international tax competion, banking • In sum: successexplained by special policy environment or by useofnaturalresources POLICIES ARE IMPORTANT

  5. About the methodology • Construction ofseveralindices • Scalingofvariables in relation to EU27 =100 • Construction ofordinal-scaleclasses from the index values • Takingaverageofordinal-scale information ofseveralindicators That gives us State Index, Change Index, Direct, Indirect and Asset AttractivenessIndices Attractiveness is a keyconceptof the study: butcancauses and effectsofsuccess (or failure) be clearlydefinedwiththisconcept? The roleof EU, state and locallevelpolicies? Theseindicesproducenicemaps and convey a general picture, butshould be usedonly for descriptivepurposes (not monitoring nor evaluation)

  6. The problem withindices • Unresolvedquestionofweighting • Lots of information is lost in the process ofcreating the indicesof the study (data from intervaltoordinalscale) – not possibletodiscernanyeffectof EU programs • The variablescomprisingindicesmay be more informative whenpresentedseparately (GDP, unemployment, population growth) • State Index correlateswith GDP per capita • Construction of new indices – the original sin ofgeographers?

  7. Methodology, cont. • The central yard stick is EU27 average • Alternative idea #1: comparisonwithother, peripheral, small, insular (island-like) regions • Alternative idea #2: Importanceof transport costswithinislandcontext, whathappenstoislandsthat get a fixedlinktomainland? What is the pure insularityeffect?

  8. Analysisof EU policies • Island ImpactAnalysis (IIA): A literaturereviewofprevious studies coupledwith an interpretation ofresultswithinislandcontext? Whyintroduce a new concept? • EU policieshave mixed impactson territorial cohesionofislands, rather negative general outcome • Programs with (potentially) positive effects: LEADER, R&D subsidies, structuralfunds • Goodpoint: Reportraisesthe importanceofbeingawareof the impactsofsectoral and EU-widepolicies on islands

  9. Place-basedpolicies on the rise • The policiesof the national and regional decision-makingbodies is being given a greaterrole in the new cohesion policy (even OECD promotesthis, Finland’s KOKO-initiative) • EU: Barca report and European Parliament’s post 2013 study • Finland’s KOKO initiative • OECDs LEED programme • A more in-depthanalysisofcurrentpoliciesofislandswouldhavebeen an importantcontribution • Local decision-making is constrained by manyfactors: what kind ofindustrial policy is possiblewithin EU?

  10. Recommendationsof the study • Transport infrastructureimprovementswithin the EU: asks for increasedawarenessofislandimpacts • Enhancedlocal-level administrative strengthtoparticipate in EU programs • Improvedcoordinationbetween EU programs • Positive discriminationof small islandswith less than 5.000 inhabitantstoday - > even for biggerislands, buthowbig? • Support toentrepreneurship and networking • Compensationof ”insularitycosts”; OK in caseof public sector, for private sectorcompetitionrules & effectsneedto be taken intoaccount

  11. Concludingreflections • Roleof EU programs is limitedcomparedto national and localpolicies • The islandimpactsofFinnish (industrial) state-levelpolicies? Finnishisland studies? • Weneedtolearnmore on the localpolicies: interplaywithcompetitionregulations and industrial policy (Itidenexample) • Less compensatoryand redistributing and moreenablingprogrammemeasures in the future? • Relation betweensubsidiarityprinciple and cohesionpolicies? Whoshould be doingwhat? • Åland is doingratherwell.Future actions?

  12. Åland issues • Tax-free basedferrytraffic: continued loss ofimportance? Need for new jobs • Firms: barrierstoentry? • People: barrierstoentry (and exit), social requirementoflinguistic & culturalconformity? • Åland’s ownpolicieshaveuneven regional effects: moreroom for regional (archipelago) solutions e.g. for land ownership?

  13. Thankyou for your attention!

More Related