html5-img
1 / 29

TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty

TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty. February 6, 2013 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources.

lyn
Download Presentation

TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty February 6, 2013 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources A few of the slides are based on a presentation by Jim Gullen Oakland Schools at the MIEM conference in Lansing on February 29th, 2012. The video protocol is based on work by Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP. Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th.

  2. Legislation Requires • Rigorous, transparent, and fair performance evaluation systems • Evaluations based on multiple rating categories • Evaluation based in part on student growth: as determined by multiple measures of student learning including national, state or local assessments or other objective criteria as a significant factor.

  3. Evaluation Components Student Outcomes • 2. The measurement of student outcomes based on a definition of desired student outcomes that is clear commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

  4. Observation Protocol has been the predominant focus, however that will shift soon

  5. Evaluation Focus Shift: What does this mean?

  6. Winston Churchill • True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information.

  7. Evaluation ComponentsObservation Protocol • 1. The measurement of practice (what an educator does) based on a definition of practice that is clear, observable, commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

  8. Proposed Legislation in Lansing • House Bill 5223 (MCL 380.1249 & 380.1531j) would revise current evaluation • requirements for teachers, and require that school districts meet new requirements for • school administrator evaluations, as described in detail in House Bill 5224. The revisions • follow.

  9. House Bill 5223 specifies instead that the percentage remain at 25 percent during the next • three academic years: 2014-2015; 2015-2016; and 2016-2017. Then, beginning in the • 2017-2018 school year, the student growth component would be raised to 50 percent.

  10. Growth-Achievement Measurement Options • 1. State Tests (MEAP/MME/MiAccess) • 2. Other third party assessments (Tera Nova, Iowa, etc) • 3. Locally Created Assessments -common assessments ? - unique assessments (SRI, DRA, Writing prompts, other).

  11. Growth- Achievement Measures continued. • 4. Measures other than Tests • Portfolios, presentations, projects, product assessments. • 5. Some combination of the above- The legislation calls for multiple measures. Each measure comes with strengths and weaknesses.

  12. 75% will be based on Observation Protocol and the 5 Standards for Effective Teaching. This includes observations (formal and not formal), walkthroughs, other performance measures that are related to the teacher evaluation rubric which includes all 5 standards. Professional Responsibilities are included as one of the standards. Weighted Formula

  13. 25% Growth Data • 5% District growth based on state accountability measures • 10% Building Growth based on state or building or district common assessments • 10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments,

  14. 10% Building Growth Data • Elementary -SRI, DRA & DRA task analysis, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments.   • Middle School -SRI, DRA, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments, and Explore. • High School- Explore, Plan, MME, MEAP, SRI, Star Math, Common Assessments, AP exams, and Departmental Assessments.

  15. 10% Classroom Growth Data • 10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments, District Common Assessments or Classroom Assessments  (ex. Performance or product measures or other formative assessments, pre and post tests are required).

  16. Teachscape • We have 59 Administrators that have passed the assessment. 14 started in a new cohort this year.

  17. Governor’s Council will ( Now Michigan Council on Educator Effectiveness • Make specific recommendations to the Governor and Legislature regarding this by April 30, 2012 • They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a)

  18. They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) • That is value-added (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (I) • Has at least a pre and post test (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (IV) • It must be based on 3 years of data if the data is available. (MCL) 380.1249(2)(a) (II)

  19. A Quote from Maya Angelou “People will forget what you said. People will forget what you did. But they will never forget how you made them feel” Commencement Address, 2002

  20. Maria Montessori • One test of the correctness of educational procedure is the happiness of the child.

  21. Legislative Changes • IDP goals developed for all 1st year probationary teachers or any teacher rated minimally effective or ineffective on most recent evaluation

  22. Plan I: • --IDP-- page 11 -to be completed by September 30th) • 2.  Post -Observation Conference Form -- page 14 and page 15 (multiple submissions, minimum of two to be competed by the end of the year. These should be spread-out during the year. ) • 3. Year End Evaluation Form -- page 16 and page 17  (to be completed by April 30th) • Please note that all timelines are recommended

  23. Plan II • 1. Professional Growth Teacher Evaluation Goal Outline Form -- page 25 and page 26. (to be completed by October 25th). • 2.  Conference Observation Form  -- page 27 -- (multiple submissions, minimum of two to be completed by April 30th) • 3.  Professional Growth Year End Evaluation Form -- page 28 and page 29 -- (to be completed by May 7th)

  24. Observations • Performance evaluations must include classroom observations. MCL 380.1249 • The observer must review • 1. Lesson Plans • 2. State Curriculum Used • 3. Pupil Engagement

  25. Observations -Administrators can still conduct informational/walkthrough observations and use the information gathered for the evaluation document

  26. HR Website / Bloghttp://humanresources.dearbornschools.org/

  27. Rate the Lesson • Based on what you observed of the lesson, how would your rate the teacher? (understanding that this is just a snapshot • Highly Effective • Effective • Minimally Effective • Ineffective

  28. Observations • What are the strengths? • What are the weaknesses? • What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions? • What recommendations might you have?

More Related