Setting the course for improved water quality
Download
1 / 37

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 86 Views
  • Updated On :

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality. A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource Managers Session 1. Examples of Impairment. Biotic Integrity. Fecal Coliform. Turbidity . Nutrients. Improving Water Quality.

Related searches for Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality' - lyle


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Setting the course for improved water quality l.jpg

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality

A TMDL Training Program for

Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource Managers

Session 1


Examples of impairment l.jpg
Examples of Impairment

Biotic Integrity

Fecal Coliform

Turbidity

Nutrients


Improving water quality l.jpg
Improving Water Quality

  • MPCA and local governments need to work together to improve water quality in impaired waters

  • Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies provide a process to make this happen


Presentation goals l.jpg
Presentation Goals

  • Discuss reasons for developing TMDLs

  • Present legal authority for Impaired Waters Program

  • Magnitude of the problem

  • Describe TMDL process, resourcesimplications, and progress made so far


Total maximum daily load tmdl study l.jpg
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study

  • It is a process

  • It is a formula


Why are total maximum daily load studies important l.jpg

You can determine how much pollution must be reduced from all sources, and which sources to focus on

You can plan an effective strategy for reducing existing pollutant loads to meet water quality standards

Why are Total Maximum Daily Load Studies Important?

Provide the scientific and logical process for studying a polluted water body so that:


Why develop a tmdl study l.jpg
Why develop a TMDL Study? all sources, and which sources to focus on

  • Required by Clean Water Act

  • Restores beneficial uses of surface waters

  • Protects community assets and quality of life (development potential, sense of place)


Why develop a tmdl study8 l.jpg
Why develop a TMDL Study? all sources, and which sources to focus on

  • Benefits recreation and tourism industry in your community

  • Annually, tourism generates $9 Billion in MN

  • $1.1Billion a year in state and local tax revenues

  • Paying for many roads, libraries, airports, and other amenities we value

    (Source: MN Office of Tourism)

  • Clean water protects property values

  • Public support for clean water is strong


Why develop a tmdl study9 l.jpg
Why develop a TMDL Study? all sources, and which sources to focus on

  • Provides an opportunity for local leadership on water management

  • Provides mechanism for integrating resource planning activities at local level (zoning, utility planning, water plans, etc.)

  • Provides a useful, long-range planning tool for managing water quality


What might happen without a tmdl study l.jpg
What might happen all sources, and which sources to focus onwithout a TMDL Study?

  • Our greatest natural assets remain impaired for present and future generations

  • Human health and safety, and recreation may be compromised

  • Growth and development may be postponed until TMDL Study is approved by EPA


Legal authority l.jpg

Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 all sources, and which sources to focus on – framework for protecting, restoring water quality

Focus:CWA Section 303 – establishes national water quality standards and Impaired Waters (TMDL) programs

Legal Authority


Section 303 of the cwa requires l.jpg

1. all sources, and which sources to focus onDesignate beneficial uses for Minnesota rivers, drainage ditches, streams, wetlands, lakes

Examples:

aquatic life support (fishing)

recreation (swimming, boating)

2. Develop water quality standards and criteria to protect beneficial uses

Section 303 of the CWA requires

Develop water quality standards for all MN waters:

( Found in: MN Rules Chapter 7050)


How do we determine whether standards are being met l.jpg

As of 2006, adequate data has been collected on: all sources, and which sources to focus on

10% of state streams

16% of state lakes

First, MPCA and other partners monitor water quality statewide

How do we determine whether standards are being met?


How do we determine whether standards are being met14 l.jpg

Then, MPCA analyzes monitoring data and compares to water quality criteria to determine whether standards are being met

Standards not met?

Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the Impaired Waters List

How do we determine whether standards are being met?


Why is the impaired waters list important l.jpg
Why is the Impaired Waters List Important? quality criteria to

303(d) Lists:

  • Inform/educate the public

  • Ensure that further study of impaired waters occurs (the TMDL Study)

  • Encourage action to restore water quality

Minn. 2006

Impaired Waters List

To date-

2,250 impairments

on

1,297 water bodies


Impairments by parameter l.jpg
Impairments, by Parameter quality criteria to

  • Mercury – 1,312

  • Turbidity - 218

  • Eutrophication/P - 208

  • Impaired Biota – 144

  • PCBs - 141

  • Fecal Coliform - 139

  • Low Dissolved Oxygen – 54

  • Others - 34


All impairments by basin l.jpg
All Impairments, by Basin quality criteria to

  • Upper Mississippi River – 595

  • Minnesota River – 497

  • Rainy River – 310

  • Lake Superior – 271

  • Red River – 200

  • St. Croix - 158

  • Lower Mississippi R. & Cedar R. – 154

  • Des Moines R. and Missouri R. – 38/27


All impairments as of 2006 l.jpg
All Impairments as of 2006 quality criteria to


Conventional parameter listings on streams l.jpg
Conventional Parameter Listings on Streams quality criteria to

Most impairments:

Turbidity, low DO, excess nutrients, fecal coliform/ E. coli, low Index of Biotic Integrity scores


Nutrients lakes listings l.jpg
Nutrients/Lakes Listings quality criteria to


Bioaccumulative toxics listings l.jpg
Bioaccumulative Toxics Listings quality criteria to

Impairments mainly caused by mercury and PCBs


Tmdls the process l.jpg
TMDLs – The Process quality criteria to

Assess waters

Determine if impaired

Place water on 303 (d) list

Monitor, study water body further

Complete pollutant load allocation formula

Develop restora-tion strategy

Implementstrategy

Monitor changes in water quality

Next steps – Delist?


What must a tmdl study include l.jpg
What must a TMDL quality criteria to Study include?

1. A public participation plan to ensure engagement, collaboration, success

2. Anassessmentof what’s causing impairment

(may include biological, chemical, habitat, flow, etc. monitoring and data analysis)

3. A technical analysis of existing pollutant loads from point and nonpoint sources


What must a tmdl study include24 l.jpg
What must a TMDL quality criteria to Study include?

4. An allocationof acceptable pollutant loads from point and nonpoint sources

5. An implementation strategy

6. A monitoring strategy to determine effectiveness of restoration activities


Tmdl scale and scope l.jpg
TMDL Scale and Scope quality criteria to

  • Location and type of impairments determine scale

  • Often done on a watershed scale for multiple impaired waterbodies

  • Staffing capacity and funding limitations

  • Work with MPCA to determine appropriate scale


Tmdl a mathematical formula l.jpg
TMDL – A Mathematical Formula quality criteria to

A TMDL Study must complete this pollution load allocation formula:

LA(s) + WLA(s) + Margin of Safety + Reserve Capacity =

Total Maximum Daily Load

Where:

LA = Load allocations from nonpoint sources

WLA = Waste load allocations from point sources

Margin of Safety = to account for potential estimation error

Reserve capacity = set aside for future development


The allocation formula determines l.jpg
The allocation formula determines … quality criteria to

the maximum amount of a specific

pollutant that can be discharged to a waterbody and still meet water quality standards


Who has legal responsibility for content of a tmdl study l.jpg
Who has legal responsibility for content of a TMDL Study? quality criteria to

The MPCA and US EPA

  • MPCA reviews all TMDLs for quality and completeness

  • MPCA and EPA responsible for legally defending the technical accuracyof the document

  • MPCA prefers to do TMDLs in cooperation with local governments


Resources available to do a tmdl study l.jpg
Resources Available to Do a TMDL Study quality criteria to

Funding for TMDL Studies

MPCA staff assistance

Consultant pool


There may be legal implications to a tmdl l.jpg
There may be legal implications to a TMDL quality criteria to

As a result of TMDL study, some National

Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

(NPDES) Permits may be modified

.


Slide31 l.jpg

  • NPDES/SDS permits --may need to have effluent limits or other requirements modified:

    1) Wastewater/industrial NPDES/SDS permits

    2) Feedlot permits (if over 1000 animal units, or

    over 500 animal units in sensitive areas)

    3) ISTS (over 10,000 gpd) permits

    4) Permitted municipal separate storm sewer

    systems (MS4s)

    5) Construction stormwater permits


Slide32 l.jpg

  • For Nonpoint Sources – other requirements modified:

    We will continue to rely on existing authorities and financial incentives and education to address certain nonpoint sources:

  • Agriculture

  • Forestry

  • Development/urbanization

  • Shoreland development


Slide33 l.jpg


Progress and status of tmdl studies in minnesota l.jpg
Progress and Status of TMDL Studies in Minnesota regulatory tools to control nonpoint sources

  • 77 TMDL studies currently underway for a total of 320 listings*

  • 95 Impaired waters listings from 15 studies with completed TMDLs

  • 9 Delistings due to point and nonpoint improvements

  • 20 Delistings due to better data

  • 1 Statewide Mercury TMDL approved for 511 listings

    *August 2007 data


Summary l.jpg
Summary regulatory tools to control nonpoint sources

  • Impaired waters are waters not meeting state water quality standards

  • The Clean Water Act requires that impaired waters be restored to meet beneficial uses

  • A TMDL is the tool to accomplish water quality improvements

  • TMDLs can provide a long-term holistic planning framework for managing water quality


Summary36 l.jpg
Summary regulatory tools to control nonpoint sources

  • A TMDL is a process and a formula to use to improve water quality

  • There are benefits – and challenges – to your community for developing a TMDL

  • Funds and assistance are available to local units of government that develop TMDLs


For more information l.jpg
For More Information regulatory tools to control nonpoint sources

Contacts:

  • Roger Ramthun – 651/296-9262

  • John Hensel - 651/296-7213

  • Glenn Skuta - 651/297-3365


ad