1 / 10

Plyler vs. Doe

Plyler vs. Doe. Ana Grajeda Marisol Quiroz Lizet Salazar. What was the history and background of the court case? Events that led to case. 1975 Texas State Law Authorization to deny enrollment to illegal immigrants. Enabled public school districts to charge tuition.

luzb
Download Presentation

Plyler vs. Doe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Plyler vs. Doe Ana Grajeda Marisol Quiroz Lizet Salazar

  2. What was the history and background of the court case? Events that led to case. • 1975 Texas State Law • Authorization to deny enrollment to illegal immigrants. • Enabled public school districts to charge tuition. • 1977 Tyler Independent School District • Superintendent James Plyeler • $1, 000 annual tuition • 4 Families of immigrant children “Doe” • Lawsuit challenging the policy

  3. What was the history and background of the court case? Events that led to case. Cont. • District court • Policy violated the Constitution • School District • Filed petition with Supreme court • Petition granted. • Plyler vs. Doe.

  4. Who were the people/parties involved and how they get involved in such a case? • Four immigrant families that were identified by the pseudonym of "Doe.” • James Plyler, superintendent of the Tyler independent school district and the state of Texas. • The state of Texas passed a law that gave public schools the right to charge tuition to immigrant children. • Four families (Doe) disagreed an filed suit against the school district.

  5. What were the arguments for both sides of the case? • The state of Texas argued that immigrant parents would have to pay in order to give their children an education.  • They saw immigrant children as a burden, because modifications would have to be made in order to accommodate the children. • They also argued that the constitution did not protect them because they were aliens.  • The immigrant families did not agree with the law.  • They argued that the constitution also defended their natural rights, and their children deserved equal education.  • The families believed that if their children were not given equal education they could not contribute to the countries success later in the future.

  6. The outcome • This court case made it possible for illegal immigrant children be able to attend school with out having to pay a fee of $1,000 and be discriminated by their legal status. It also made it illegal for the federal government to discriminate against them as well. • The court case impacted the law in the way that no matter if they are illegal immigrants they have the right to an education. School districts cannot charge students money because of their legal status and linguistically diverse, everyone has an equal opportunity to get an education.

  7. The outcome impact • The court case impacted the law in the way that no matter if they are illegal immigrants they have the right to an education. School districts cannot charge students money because of their legal status and linguistically diversity everyone has an equal opportunity to get an education.

  8. Summary • Ana: • Marisol: I believe this law was made so public schools do not discriminate students and also the federal government does not push aside the fact that everyone is entitled to a free education. • Lizet: Being a Hispanic the outcome of this case was favorable.  The fairest thing was decided, all children deserve equal education no matter their race, skin color, or ethnicity. This not only created equality but  provided the proper education.

  9. References • Fitz, M. Wolgin, P. E. Garcia, A. (2012). Triumphs and Challenges on the 30th Anniversary of Plyler v. Doe: A Landmark Supreme Court Case on Providing Education to Immigrant Children Under Threat. Retrieved from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2012/06/pdf/plyler.pdf • Immigration Policy Center. (2012). Public Education for Immigrant Students: States Challenge Supreme Court's Decision in Plyler v. Doe. Retrieved from http://immigrationpolicy.org/just-facts/public-education • Plyler, Superintendent, Tyler Independent School District v. Doe. (). Retrieved from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/plyler.html • Plyler v. Doe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe • Wright, W. E. (2010). Foundations for teaching English language learners: Research, theory, policy, and practice. Philadelphia: Caslon Pub.

More Related