Slide1 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

Research Grant-Writing Workshop PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Research Grant-Writing Workshop. Contents. Topic Selection Foundation Research Focus Grant Application Process Why Proposals are not Funded Sample Funded Proposal. Choosing a Topic. Relevant Interesting Focused. Topic Selection. Choose an area of study that fascinates you.

Download Presentation

Research Grant-Writing Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Slide1 l.jpg


Grant-Writing Workshop

Contents l.jpg


  • Topic Selection

  • Foundation Research Focus

  • Grant Application Process

  • Why Proposals are not Funded

  • Sample Funded Proposal

Choosing a topic l.jpg

Choosing a Topic

  • Relevant

  • Interesting

  • Focused

Topic selection l.jpg

Topic Selection

  • Choose an area of study that fascinates you.

  • Keep it simple but informative.

  • Keep writing things down to clarify your thinking.

Searching for topics l.jpg

Clinical practice

Professional issues

Explore Theories

Educational issues

Research Reports

Searching for Topics

Where to start l.jpg

Non peer-reviewed

Trade Magazines

Internet sites


Professional Journals

Research Journals

Where to start?

Foundation s research focus l.jpg

Foundation’s Research Focus

  • Broaden the participation of radiologic technologists in studies of the radiologic sciences.

  • Increase the body of knowledge that is crucial for the advancement of professionals in the field.

Research agenda l.jpg

Research Agenda

  • Education

    • Methods, curricula, issues

  • Management

    • Challenges, workforce, tools, issues

  • Practice

    • Change, patients, professional development, issues

  • Technology

    • Adapting, assessing, issues

Grant application process l.jpg

Grant Application Process

  • Research Mentor Available Upon Request

    • Submit Letter of Intent (Optional)

  • Submit Full Proposal

    • Application deadlines, March and August 1st

    • RGAP review

    • Board of Trustees funding decision

  • Award categories

    • Fully Funded

    • Partially Funded

Letter of intent optional l.jpg

Letter of Intent (Optional)

  • Applicant information

  • Problems/issues to be addressed

  • Objectives

  • Approach and activities

  • Estimated timeframe and total budget

Proposal contents l.jpg

Application Form

Table of Contents


Itemized Budget



Institutional Assurances

Cooperating Institutions


Statement of Problem

Specific Aims

Literature Review

Proposed Activities



Facilities and Equipment

Proposal Contents

Review criteria l.jpg

Review Criteria

  • Significance/relevance of the proposal

  • Qualifications/resources of the principal investigator and associated personnel

  • Adequate address of concerns

  • Appropriateness of methodology and experimental design

  • Soundness of budget

  • Literature review

Why proposals are not funded l.jpg

Writer did not follow guidelines provided by funding agency

Proposal objectives do not match objectives of funding source

Proposal budget is not within range of funding available through the funding agency

Proposal is poorly written, hard to understand

Problem does not strike reviewer as significant

Project objectives are too ambitious in scope

Problem has not been documented properly

Prospective client groups have not been involved in planning and determining project goals

Proposed program has not been coordinated with other individuals and organizations

Funding source does not know the capabilities of those submitting the proposal

Proposal does not include sufficient evidence that the project can sustain itself beyond the life of the grant

Evaluation process is inadequate

Why Proposals Are Not Funded

Nonprofit Resource Center of Texas ( How to Write a Winning Proposal

Why proposals are not funded14 l.jpg

Why Proposals Are Not Funded

and the all-time favorite,

There is not enough money available to fund all the outstanding proposals that are submitted

Sample funded proposal l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Statement of problem

  • Specific aims

  • Literature review

  • Proposed activities

  • Calendar

  • Personnel

  • Facilities and equipment

  • Budget

Sample funded proposal16 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Statement of problem

    • Education in the radiologic sciences has witnessed rapid change in recent years. The number of educational programs housed in hospitals has declined while programs in community colleges and universities have been on the rise.

Sample funded proposal17 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Statement of problem

    • Educational programs housed in community colleges and universities bring new challenges to the radiologic technology (R.T.) educator.

    • Issues particularly challenging for R.T. educators are the need to participate in academic activities of service and scholarship in order to achieve promotion and tenure.

Sample funded proposal18 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Statement of problem*

    • Although some would argue that radiologic technologists should not be held to the same high standard [of scholarship] as other disciplines.

    • Additionally, the expectations and resources for community and professional service along with research and scholarship may vary greatly from one institution to another.

  • *Significance, relevance and documentation

Sample funded proposal19 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Specific aims

    • The proposed study will survey R.T. educators to determine characteristics such as, type of degree, position, type of educational institution, research productivity, and perceived barriers to research.

Sample funded proposal20 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Specific aims

  • What are the demographic characteristics of radiologic technologist educators (i.e., gender, race, age, salary, type of degree, work environment, position title, tenure status)?

  • What is the scholarly productivity (i.e.: number of publications in peer-reviewed journals, book reviews, books, book chapters, scientific presentations) of the study population?

  • What are the perceived barriers to research as identified by R.T. educators (i.e. knowledge, release time, assistants, resources, administrative support)?

Sample funded proposal21 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Literature Review

    • Issues of research productivity and tenure have been well established in the allied health professional literature.

    • It is clearly documented that expectations of research productivity are important criteria for promotion and tenure.

    • Additionally, the allied health profession has been viewed as lacking in research productivity in comparison to other disciplines.

Sample funded proposal22 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Literature Review

    • A common theme among all of these allied health professions is recognition of the lack of research productivity and its subsequent impact on the profession’s status and faculty’s’ ability to survive in a competitive academic environment.

Sample funded proposal23 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Literature Review

    • The results of a recent study by Legg and Fauber on doctorally prepared radiologic technologists are consistent with the allied health literature in that “radiologic technologists holding doctoral degrees are not productive in research and scholarship”.

    • What is still not known is the research productivity of R.T.'s holding other levels of degrees. In addition, what do R.T. educators perceive as barriers to research.

Sample funded proposal24 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Literature Review*

    • As a member of the allied health community, R.T. educators play a significant role in preparing future technologists but also in contributing to the continued development of the profession.

    • Productivity in research and scholarship is considered an important activity to increase the knowledge base of a profession.

    • The lack of data describing the professional profile of R.T. educators has led to the proposed study.

*Cite literature support

Sample funded proposal25 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Proposed Activities

    • This non-experimental survey research study will provide a demographic and professional profile of registered radiologic technologist educators.

    • A survey questionnaire previously developed by the investigators will be revised for use with the population of R.T. educators.

    • The survey questionnaire will be used to obtain descriptive data for the research population as well as to assess the respondents' research production, scholarly activities and perceived barriers to research.

Sample funded proposal26 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Proposed Activities

    • A mailing list of registered radiologic technologists self identified as educators (~ 2500) will be obtained from the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists and forwarded to Virginia Commonwealth University’s Survey and Evaluation Research Lab.

    • The staff from the Institution’s Survey Research Lab will select a simple random population sample (~ 1000), conduct the initial and follow up mailings and data entry.

Sample funded proposal27 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Proposed Activities*

    • Data gathered will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, cross tabulations and correlation methods.

    • The research results will be compiled to present a demographic and professional profile of R.T. educators.

    • Results will be presented at various national professional meetings and submitted as a manuscript for publication in Radiologic Technology.

*Feasibility and Appropriateness of methodology

Sample funded proposal28 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Calendar

Sample funded proposal29 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Personnel*

    • The PI will coordinate and oversee the activities of the listed personnel, assist in survey tool revision, survey distribution, statistical analysis, research results and write a majority of the narrative.

    • The investigator has experience with funded research projects from the AERS and ASRT. In addition, she has published the results of funded projects in peer-reviewed professional journals.

*Qualifications of the principal investigator

Sample funded proposal30 l.jpg

Sample Funded Proposal

  • Facilities and Equipment*

    • Existing office space in the Department of Radiation Sciences, School of Allied Health Professions (SAHP) at Virginia Commonwealth University will be utilized for conducting this project.

    • The SAHP has a national reputation for quality allied health profession programs in addition to the extensive scholarship of its faculty.

    • The investigators each have access to personal computers, university mainframe computing, statistical software, spreadsheet software, and

      Internet access.

*Appropriateness of facilities

Sample budget l.jpg

Sample Budget*

*Soundness of budget

  • Login