The journal as index and incentive for data publication
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

The journal as index and incentive for data publication PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 75 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The journal as index and incentive for data publication. Myles Axton Editor, Nature Genetics Cambridge Oct 23 rd 2011. Nature quality primary research in genetics and genomics. - Professional editors choose which papers to publish

Download Presentation

The journal as index and incentive for data publication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The journal as index and incentive for data publication

The journal as index and incentive for data publication

Myles Axton

Editor,

Nature Genetics

Cambridge

Oct 23rd 2011


Nature quality primary research in genetics and genomics

Nature quality primary research in genetics and genomics

- Professional editors choose which papers to publish

- Peer referees provide technical guidance to improve the work

- Editorial standards and decision criteria are constantly revised in light of referee advice, author comments, conference presentations and lab visits

- Standards of the journal constantly get higher

All Nature Research Journals use two basic criteria for decisions:

Novelty: new data, new resource

Conceptual advance: new ideas, new strategies

Plus:

Nature:Is this work of general interest to all scientists, to decision makers or to the public?

Nature Genetics:How many other researchers will do their research differently as a result of this work?


Scope of nature genetics

Scope of Nature Genetics

Common/complex diseases - Risk

Gene networks - Wiring

Cancer

Human disease genetics

Pharmacological genomics

Epigenetics

Developmental genetics

Functional genomics

Stem cell genetics

Genetic technology

Genome evolution


Results data funding and contributors

Results, data, funding and contributors


Footnotes and xml tags for contributor roles

Footnotes and XML tags for contributor roles


Publisher metadata transmitted to popular sites

Publisher metadata transmitted to popular sites


Better information and metrics for authors and funders

Better information and metrics for authors and funders


Citable data management plans by data producers

Citable data management plans by data producers

- Citable by unique digital object identifier (DOI) that points to current version.

- Previous versions stored and independently citable.

- Project descriptions (“marker papers”) grouped in a Collection together with funder policy

documents and community standards papers.


What conventions and accession codes do 8 journals enforce

What conventions and accession codes do 8 journals enforce?

Annals of Human Genetics, Genetics in Medicine, Genome Research, Human Mutation,

Journal of Human Genetics, Journal of Medical Genetics, Nature Genetics, PLoS Biology

Grant and funder information6 by initials, 3 optional

Competing financial interests5 publish, 1 if positive, 2 optional

OMIM accession4 mandate, 4 do not

HGNC gene names4 throughout, 3 first use, 2 no obligation

Model organism database: genes4 mandate mouse, 3 all models

DNA sequence 4 public deposit, 2 encourage, 2 no obligation

Primer sequences4 mandate publication, 4 no obligation

Expression array 3 mandate, 2 encourage, 3 no obligation

LOVD deposition of human variants3 endorse, 5 not policy

Prepublication data sharing2 for review, 1 if referees, 1 no enforcement, 4 no policy

Postpublication data sharing2 enforce, 1 policy, 5 no policy

NCBI/EBI deposition of human variants2 mandate, 3 endorse, 3 not policy

Author contribution statement2 by initials, 4 optional, 1 in supplementary information

HGVS allele nomenclature1 throughout, 1 first use, 2 optional, 4 no policy


Pilot study in data publishing and citation

Pilot study in data publishing and citation

Thomson Reuters

Joel Hammond

Bruce Kiesel

Leiden U.

Med. Cent.

Herman van Haagen

Erik Schultes

Barend Mons

Ivo Fokkema

Johan den Dunnen

Erasmus Med. Cent.

Bharat Singh

Free U. Amsterdam

Paul Groth

Penn. State U.

Belinda Giardine

NPG

Myles Axton

Tony Hammond


Microattribution

Microattribution

  • Journals provide citation links from paper to paper. Quantitative citation provides a rough measure of usefulness.

  • Database accessions should be traceable to their original source.

  • Citations to database accessions in peer reviewed papers and in database entries should be counted and the count made public.

  • Microcitation provides incentive for collaborative genome annotation and a more accurate picture of individual and group research activity.

  • Microattribution can be extended to web traffic analysis.


Microattribution is an incentive to database deposition

Microattribution is an incentive to database deposition

Microattribution started


Human variome microattribution review hemoglobin

Human Variome Microattribution Review (Hemoglobin)

http://www.bx.psu.edu/~giardine/


Rdf xml triplet with provenance metadata

RDF/XML triplet with provenance metadata

Supplementary Table 1 Nanopublications of the form [HGVS gene variant name][has][Variant frequency]

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"    xmlns:n="http://example/schema/">  <n:nanopublication rdf:about="#2000">    <n:triplet>      <rdf:Statement>        <rdf:subjectrdf:resource="http://example/id/NG_000007.3:g.70628G>A"/>        <rdf:predicaterdf:resource="http://example/genetics/has-variant-frequency"/>        <rdf:object>0.25%</rdf:object>      </rdf:Statement>    </n:triplet>    <n:condition>Sardinian</n:condition>    <n:provenance>      <rdf:Description>        <n:researcherID>HbVar (A-2391-2010)</n:researcherID>        <n:DOI rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.785"/>        <n:PMID rdf:resource="info:pmid/6695908"/>        <n:PMID rdf:resource="info:pmid/1428944"/>        <n:PMID rdf:resource="info:pmid/1610915"/>        <n:linkoutrdf:resource="http://globin.bx.psu.edu/cgi-bin/hbvar/query_vars3?mode=output&amp;display_format=page&amp;i=239;http://phencode.bx.psu.edu/cgi-bin/phencode/phencode?build=hg18&amp;id=HbVar.239"/>      </rdf:Description>    </n:provenance>  </n:nanopublication></rdf:RDF>


Our experiments suggest articles are a poor source of data

Our experiments suggest articles are a poor source of data

  • Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD)196,000 variants in 3,267 genes from 84,937 individuals

  • Giardine et al. (ng.785) 1,901 unique variants in 37 genes affecting hemoglobin levels

    1) Text search 10m PubMed abstracts with 4,940 gene variants of 11 genes in LOVD.

    16 out of 10,000,000 abstracts contained gene variants from the search set

    2) Search for 2,545 DMD variants in the full text of 109 articles on Duchenne muscular dystrophy selected by LOVD curator Johan den Dunnen.

    625 out of 2,545 variants were found in 22 out of 109 articles (2,565 total mentions)

    3) Search all LOVD entries with PubMed PMIDs indicating Nature Genetics articles.

    LOVD database linked a gene variant to 19 of 36 articles. Only 3 articles mention the variant in unambiguous HGVS nomenclature in the text.

    4) Text mining ng.785 for nanopublications concerning all biomedical concepts.

    a) From the article, 13 out of a total of 698 nanopublications assert genetic variation

    b) From the Supplementary Tables, 1,734 nanopublications of the form [HGVS variant][has][OMIM VarID]

    and 121 of the form [HGVS variant][has][variant frequency]

    c) >40,000 nanopublications from the HbVarDB described by the article


Scholarly communication

Scholarly communication

Current

Proposed

Nature Genetics 43, 281–283 (2011) doi:10.1038/ng0411-281


Thank you

Thank you!


  • Login