1 / 24

Edwards Aquifer MODFLOW Model Updates

Edwards Aquifer MODFLOW Model Updates. Jim Winterle—EAA Modeling Supervisor Presentation to HCP Science Committee May 8, 2014. MODFLOW Model Review and Updates.

lucus
Download Presentation

Edwards Aquifer MODFLOW Model Updates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Edwards Aquifer MODFLOW Model Updates Jim Winterle—EAA Modeling Supervisor Presentation to HCP Science Committee May 8, 2014

  2. MODFLOW Model Review and Updates • Verification Analysis completed August 2013: update model inputs to include years 2001—2009 and run using existing calibration to evaluated how well model predicts a time period not used in the calibration • Post-Audit Updates to be completed by December 31, 2014: updated layer elevations and structural features to reflect current understanding and recalibrate model for years 2001—2011 • Schedule for completion: updated, calibrated model by December 31, 2014

  3. MODFLOW Model Updates • Inputs: Pumping and recharge for years 2001—2011 • Observations/Calibration Targets: water levels and spring flows • Structural Features • Layer Top and Bottom Elevations • Hydrologic Flow Barriers (HFB Package) • Potential Model Domain changes • Revise Northern Boundary? • Remove Barton Springs Segment?

  4. Recharge Estimation Methods • USGS (Puente, 1978, method) • HSPF Watershed Models

  5. HSPF Watershed Models • Updates and recalibrations of all nine HSPF watershed models were completed in early 2013 by Clear Creek Solutions under a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study

  6. HSPF Watershed Model Results • HSPF models results generally lower than USGS estimates for wet periods and similar during dry periods Recharge (acre-feet)

  7. HSPF Watershed Model Results • HSPF recharge estimates are generally lower than cumulative recharge estimated through mass balance methods, while USGS estimates are higher

  8. Pumping

  9. Water Withdrawal Locations • Dataset improvements over original model includes detailed information on pumping locations and amounts

  10. Pumping Input Data

  11. Observations/Calibration Targets

  12. Water Level Observations • Approximately fourfold increase in number of observation wells for calibration targets • 423 water-level target locations from 2001-2009

  13. MODFLOW Model Structural Features

  14. Faults as Horizontal Flow Barriers (MODFLOW HFB Package)

  15. Zoom-in view of HFB

  16. MODFLOW Model Potential Domain Changes

  17. MODFLOW Model Northern Boundary

  18. MODFLOW Model without Barton Spring Segment

  19. With Barton Springs Segment Without Barton Springs Segment

More Related