precision measurement of mixing angles and cp
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Precision measurement of mixing angles and CP

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 36

Precision measurement of mixing angles and CP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 47 Views
  • Uploaded on

Precision measurement of mixing angles and CP. Hisakazu Minakata PUC-Rio. PUC-Rio, where?. Maracana. n a = U a i n i. All the angles are measured !lepton CP phase d left. SK-atm+MINOS+T2K. T2K-MINOS-DC-DB-RENO. solar+KamLAND. q 12.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Precision measurement of mixing angles and CP' - lucita


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide6
q12
  • sin2q12 = 0.304 +/- 0.013
  • Error of sin2q12 = 4.3%
  • Error of Dm221 = 2.4%

KamLAND Mar.2013

[email protected]

sado idea proposal july 2004
SADO idea/proposal (July 2004)
  • “SADO” = Several tens of km AntineutrinoDetectOr
  • Basic idea: 1st oscillation minima of Pee is the right place for precision measurement of q12

HM-Nunokawa-Teves-ZukanovichFunchal,

ArXiv 0407326 PRD(2005)

[email protected]

sado vs kamland sensitivity
SADO-vsKamLAND sensitivity

SADO 3s sensitivity ~ KamLAND 1s sensitivity

[email protected]

solar kamland and sado are good competitors
Solar+KamLANDand SADO are good competitors

2% (1s) in sin2q12 reachable with systematic error of 4%

  • Tuned reactor may have better sensitivity with long-run because tuning L is powerful

Bahcall-Pena-Garay

Slide at World Physics Summit @Galapagos, June 22-25, 2006

[email protected]

quark lepton complementarity
Quark-Lepton Complementarity

QLC is based on observation: q12 + qC = p/4

Bi-maximal mixing from neutrinos

HM-A.Smirnov PRD 2004

Predicted value ofq13in this model agrees well with experiments ! Large q13 natural in QLC

[email protected]

impressive to see the real proposals today
Impressive to see the real proposals today!

Daya Bay II

Sin2q12 error:

RENO ~ 1% (K.K.Joo)

Daya Bay II 0.63% claimed! (Yifang Wang), Talk both at ICRR)

[email protected]

q 13 reno
q13:RENO
  • If added quadrature, sin22q13 = 0.1 +/- 0.018
  • sin2q13 = 0.0257 +/- 0.0048
  • Error of sin2q13 = 19%

[email protected]

q 13 daya bay
q13:Daya Bay
  • If added quadrature, sin22q13 = 0.089 +/- 0.011
  • sin2q13 = 0.0228 +/- 0.0029
  • Error of sin2q13 = 13%

[email protected]

how to improve q 13
How to improve q13?
  • Continued running of reactor experiments
  • Can accelerator measurement supersade reactor q13 accuracy? If yes, when?
  • What is the ultimate error of q13 ?
  • If sin22q13 = 0.1 +/- 0.005 5% error for sin2q13
  • Is 2-3% error achievable for sin2q13 ?
  • Neutrino factory?
  • Reactor + identical 2 detector appears to be practically the best way

Memory of Lev Mikaelyan @ Kurchatov Inst.

[email protected]

ultimate error of q 13
Ultimate error of q13?

D(sin2q) / sin2q = (1.6-2.0) (Dq / q)

P. Coloma etal. JHEP12

DayaBay ultimate (syst. only)

[email protected]

error of q 23 is large because
Error of q23 is large because ..
  • Jacobian effect:
  • Octant degeneracy + exp. uncertainty  merging of clone solution to true one

HM-Sonoyama-Sugiyama PRD 2004 

[email protected]

use solar term or r a to solve q 23 octant degeneracy
Use solar term or R+A to solve q23 octant degeneracy

Hiraideetal. PRD2006

d=0 assumed

T2K-II + phase II reactor

T2KK

sin2 2q13

T2KK 2s

(rough)

> 3s

2~3s

sin2 2q13

hep-ph/0601258

T2KK has better sensitivity

at sin2 2q13 < 0.06~0.07 .

Kajitaetal. PRD2007

[email protected]

sin2 q23

use atmospheric neutrino to probe solar n oscillation
Use atmospheric neutrino to probe solar n oscillation

Hyper-K LOI : ArXiv 1109.3262

Barger etal. PRL 2012

[email protected]

how to measure cp
How to measure CP
  • nmsuperbeam appears to be the prime candidate
  • T2KK CP sensitivity ~ T2HK CP sensitivity

[email protected]

determination of d in correlation with q 13
Determination of d in correlation with q13?
  • So far CP d measurement has been discussed in a framework of simultaneous d – q13 determination  intrinsic d - q13 degeneracy enriched with unknown mass hierarchy
  • Right framework? NO! Better setting: simultaneous d – q23 determination

People were focused on another cosmos ..

[email protected]

why q 23 relevant for cp
Why q23 relevant for CP?
  • In precision era for CP the errors of d will be dominated by uncertainty of s223
  • D sind =
  • D cosd =

Error formula for CP dh = order unity

HM-Parke, ArXiv 1303.6178

For a given set of (P, P-bar) with finite error, a change in s223 can be compensated by adjusting d

[email protected]

simultaneous q 23 d determination
Simultaneous q23– d determination

What you need is to switch q13 q23 everything goes through as in (q13-d) case

For a given set of (P, P-bar) there are 2x2=4 solutions of q23 and d

[email protected]

1 st oscillation maximum
1st Oscillation maximum

Things are much simpler in oscillation maximum

[email protected]

use n e appearance channel
Use ne appearance channel
  • simultaneous d – q23 determination by ne and ne-bar appearance channels
  • q23 intrinsic degeneracy

[email protected]

breaking q 23 d degeneracy
Breaking q23– d degeneracy

At 1st VOM

Spectrum information must solve the degeneracy!

Off 1st VOM

[email protected]

Hyper-K: DE= +/- 10%:

LBNE: DE= +/- 20%:

2 nd vacuum oscillation maximum
2nd vacuum oscillation maximum

At 2nd VOM, D=3p/2

DE= +/- 3%:

Movement of clone solution is more prominent at 2nd VOM

[email protected]

conclusion
Conclusion
  • Current status of mixing angle measurement outlined
  • Some ideas seeking for better precision discussed
  • Further improvement appear realistic for q12(new projects) and q13 (continue running), but may not be for q23 at near maximal, because…
  • Fortunately, if you measure d, then you automatically get q23!

[email protected]

ad