Risk assessment for invasive aquatic plants l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

Risk Assessment For Invasive Aquatic Plants PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 166 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Risk Assessment For Invasive Aquatic Plants. Reuben Keller & David Lodge. Presentation to: Invasive Plant Species Assessment Working Group Indianapolis, Nov. 30, 2004. Overview. Invasive aquatic plants in Indiana Impacts Sources Regulations Reducing the impacts

Download Presentation

Risk Assessment For Invasive Aquatic Plants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Risk assessment for invasive aquatic plants l.jpg

Risk Assessment For Invasive Aquatic Plants

Reuben Keller & David Lodge

Presentation to: Invasive Plant Species Assessment Working Group Indianapolis, Nov. 30, 2004


Overview l.jpg

Overview

  • Invasive aquatic plants in Indiana

    • Impacts

    • Sources

    • Regulations

    • Reducing the impacts

  • Species available through watergarden and aquarium trades

  • Statistical risk assessment for invasive aquatic plants in the Midwest


Slide3 l.jpg

Invasion Process

Species Elsewhere

In Pathway

e.g. imported for trade

Introduced

Reproducing

Established

Ecological &/or

Economic impacts

Invasive


Invasive aquatic plants in indiana l.jpg

Invasive Aquatic Plants In Indiana

Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) is established across IN

Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) is established in 175 lakes and reservoirs, and many waterways

Curly-leafed pondweed (Potamogeton crispus)

~$803,000 spent each year just on herbicide control

More spent on biocontrol

Value of lost opportunities (boating, fishing etc.) not estimated


Sources l.jpg

Sources

  • Watergardening (e.g. purple loosestrife)

  • Aquariums (e.g. Eurasian watermilfoil, curly-leafed pondweed)

  • Landscaping, erosion control (e.g. reed canary-grass Phalaris arundinacea)


In regulations l.jpg

IN Regulations

  • Federal noxious weed list (19 species) + Lythrum

    • Azolla pinnata (mosquito fern)

    • Caulerpa taxifolia (Mediterranean clone)

    • Eichornia azurea (anchored waterhyacinth)

    • Hydrilla verticillata

    • Hygrophila polysperma (Miramar weed)

    • Ipomoea aquatica (water spinach)

    • Lagarosiphon major (Moss)

    • Limnophila sessiflora (ambulia)

    • Melaleuca quenquinervia

    • Monachoria hastata

    • Monochoria vaginalis

    • Ottelia alismoides

    • Sagittaria sagittifolia (arrowhead)

    • Salvinia auriculata (giant salvinia)

    • Salvinia biloba (giant salvinia)

    • Salvinia herzogii (giant salvinia)

    • Salvinia molesta (giant salvinia)

    • Solanum tampicense (wetland nightshade)

    • Sparganium erectum (exotic bur-reed)


Reducing the impacts l.jpg

Reducing The Impacts

Invasion Steps

Options

Effective?

Species Elsewhere

×

Prevention – exclude species of concern

Yes

Introduced

Insure no propagules can escape cultivation

Unlikely

Established

Unlikely – requires surveys and funds on hand

Rapid response - eliminate populations while small

Invasive

Mitigate damage, control spread, eradicate if possible

Eradication usually impossible, control is expensive


Reducing the impacts8 l.jpg

Reducing The Impacts

Invasion Steps

Options

Effective?

Species Elsewhere

Prevention – exclude species of concern

Yes

Introduced

×

Insure no propagules can escape cultivation

Unlikely

Established

Unlikely – requires surveys and funds on hand

Rapid response - eliminate populations while small

Invasive

Mitigate damage, control spread, eradicate if possible

Eradication usually impossible, control is expensive


Reducing the impacts9 l.jpg

Reducing The Impacts

Invasion Steps

Options

Effective?

Species Elsewhere

Prevention – exclude species of concern

Yes

Introduced

Insure no propagules can escape cultivation

Unlikely

Established

×

Unlikely – requires surveys and funds on hand

Rapid response - eliminate populations while small

Invasive

Mitigate damage, control spread, eradicate if possible

Eradication usually impossible, control is expensive


Reducing the impacts10 l.jpg

Reducing The Impacts

Invasion Steps

Options

Effective?

Species Elsewhere

Prevention – exclude species of concern

Yes

Introduced

Insure no propagules can escape cultivation

Unlikely

Established

Unlikely – requires surveys and funds on hand

Rapid response - eliminate populations while small

Invasive

Mitigate damage, control spread, eradicate if possible

Eradication usually impossible, control is expensive


Summary part 1 l.jpg

Summary: Part 1

  • Invasive aquatic plants have significant ecological and economic impacts in Indiana

  • Most are intentionally introduced

  • Current regulations are inadequate

  • Preventing introduction is the best way to prevent future impacts


2 species available l.jpg

2. Species Available

  • What species are available?

    • Buy and identify organisms

  • What risks are posed?

    • Spread of known invaders

    • Introduction of new invaders


Slide13 l.jpg

Organisms Purchased


Risks posed plants l.jpg

Risks Posed - Plants

  • Availability of known invasives

    • 45% of US restricted plants available over web

    • Eurasian watermilfoil, curly-leafed pondweed, water chestnut and many more invasive, or potentially invasive, species

  • Misidentifications

    • 40% of Linnean names incorrect

    • Ambiguous common names


Contaminants l.jpg

Contaminants

  • 5 snail species

  • 1 crustacean species

  • 2 insect species

  • duckweed (Lemna sp.)


Summary species available l.jpg

Summary: Species Available

  • Watergarden and aquarium trades are spreading potential and known invaders

  • Plants are often incorrectly identified by vendors

  • Plant trade is a vector for the transfer of many contaminant species


Overall conclusions l.jpg

Overall Conclusions

  • Invasive aquatic plant species are a significant economic and ecological problem in Indiana

  • Preventing introduction is the best way to stop further damages

  • Many actually or potentially invasive species are being spread through trades

  • Risk assessment is possible and accurate


  • Login