1 / 13

Strikes and Related Activities

Strikes and Related Activities. Strikes: Concerted withdrawals of labor, usually an economic pressure tactic Important as an influence (the strike threat/threat to take a strike) even in the absence of their actual occurrence. That is, the possibility of a strike is critical

lucas
Download Presentation

Strikes and Related Activities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strikes and Related Activities • Strikes: Concerted withdrawals of labor, usually an economic pressure tactic • Important as an influence (the strike threat/threat to take a strike) even in the absence of their actual occurrence. That is, the possibility of a strike is critical • Wisdom: Peace often prevails in one place or time because of a conflict somewhere else or at some other time

  2. Selected Theories of Strikes wages • Hicks’ Model • Both sides expect a strike will result in an eventual wage settlement, Wes • Management is willing to pay a higher wage, Wes+Wm, to avoid strike costs, • Union is willing to accept a lower wage the Wes to avoid strike costs, Wes-Wu • These two points define the contract zone • There should be no strikes except for mistakes (miscalculations, differing expectations, assymetric information) • Kerr and Siegel: Isolated communities, rugged and dangerous work • Marxists: Strikes reflect worker militancy Wes+Wm Wes Wes-Wu

  3. Contractual or “economic” strike: Re terms of a new contract (or renewal) Grievance strike: Re application/interpretation of current contract (rare due to GP/Arbitration) Wildcat strike: Without official approval, probably in violation of agreed procedures or no-strike clause (suit for damages, injunction possible) ULP strike: Re mgmt ULPs Can’t replace strikers (if true); they get reinstated w/ backpay Why? Discourage ERs from provoking strikes; push peace Jurisdictional: Re work assignment; ER is caught in the middle. Illegal unless ER violates prior NLRB rule General: Re government or employers generally(rare in U.S.) Sympathy: In support of other’s dispute; often mixed w/ secondary activity Strikes:Various Types

  4. Strike-Like Actions • Slowdowns, often via “working to rule” or “soldiering” (following rules to the letter) • May violate contract, but hard to prove or counter • May be part of union “in plant” strategy when strike seems too dangerous (fear of replacement) • Others (some similar), mostly in public sector and elsewhere where strikes are limited/banned • “Blue flu” or “white flu” (mass sick-outs) • Mass resignations • Speed-ups (e.g., state troopers writing tickets)

  5. Lockouts • Employer-initiated. ER bars current workforce and may hire temporary replacements • Use is restricted by NLRB to “defensive purposes” • Why? ER already has strike counter -- the ability to take a strike (and hire replacements). Also, ER controls the status quo in the absence of a contract (e.g., can simply impose its last offer) • Defensive purposes • Preventing sabotage (if grounds for expecting) • Prevent whipsawing in multi-employer arrangement • Other: Broader definition under Reagan NLRB (e.g., impasse, but ER can’t create impasse in order to use lockout)

  6. Boycotts • Concerted refusals to purchase or handle a product • Restrictions • Union ULP provisions of NLRA/LMRA, basically to prevent “secondary activities,” to contain disputes to immediate parties • Some exemptions re “struck work” and other special conditions • Generally okay if the boycott call is directed to consumers and focuses on the specific product involved in a primary dispute (e.g., say Quincy Farms and UFW have a primary dispute) • “Don’t buy Quincy Farm mushrooms” -- okay • “Don’t shop at Publix” -- not okay • “Comrades, don’t stock QF mushrooms on shelves” -- not okay

  7. Picketing • A form of speech; hence restrictions can run afoul of First Amendment (free speech protections) • Thornhill Doctrine (from 1940 court decision) banned most all restrictions; courts have since retreated from that stance, and additional legislation has restricted some particulars • Three major forms; restrictions vary by type • Recognitional -- recall some restrictions in ULP provisions • Consumer -- to call consumer boycott; least restricted • Informational -- to call attention to dispute, dissuade “scabs,” inform others (who may exercise their sympathy strike rights) • Legality issues • Purpose and effects considered (see types above re purpose) • Can’t block entry and exit; no mass picketing to this effect • Conduct subject to usual laws; but name-calling (“scabs!”) not a concern

  8. Levels of Strike Activity • Record low levels in recent years: .01% of potential work time “lost” compared to record high of 1% in 1946 • Much more time is “lost” to coffee breaks • Figures overstate real loss. Overtime and extended seasons help offset • Fewer than 10% of contract expirations yield strikes • Steady downward trend reflects: • More emphasis on cooperation? Perhaps • Maturation and better negotiation skills? Maybe • Declining unionization and diminished strike effectiveness? Almost certainly • Strike losses = frequency x scope x duration • In effect, measured “volume” or level of strike activity is “3D” • Shapes differ across nations, reflecting different strike purposes, etc. • Overall, U.S. strike activity level is moderate among advanced industrial nations; longer duration, but less frequent and smaller scope

  9. Strike Decisions • Some strikes are simply mistakes, but strikes can and usually do serve important functions • Mainly, as intended, to exert economic pressure for settlement • Therapeutic value -- a way to “blow off steam,” vent frustrations • Resolve factionalism by rallying against an external opponent • Maintain credibility of the strike threat for future use • Modify members’ “excessive” expectations • Bring real authorities to the negotiation table (“Final Offer”?) or change budget to enable opponent concessions • Change bargaining structure (alter power balance) • Serious business, not to be taken lightly • Could be very damaging or fatal to either side • Violence may stem from intense feelings and confrontations • Bitterness may endure after settlement, damage efficiency

  10. Strike Decisions -- Costs • Unions and workers • Lost wages and benefits hard to make up later; strike benefits are usually pretty meager (e.g., $100 week). • Permanent job losses (via replacement and other means) • Union might lose the unit; decertification often follows a failed strike • Psychological costs. Sense of self worth often found in one’s work, and prolonged idleness can be devastating. Possible “carnival atmosphere” fades fast. It got old the first day -- Tallahassee Greyhound striker quoted in Democrat in the early 1990s about long strike • Companies • Loss of sales, customers, and market share • Fixed costs (e.g., loans) won’t go away • “Ill will” -- public image, customer and employee relations may be damaged • Share price damage appears to be temporary

  11. Controversy:Striker Replacement • McKay Radio court decision (1938) • Law (NLRA) clearly bans discrimination on the basis of union activity, including firing workers for strike action • Hiring permanent replacements, however, is another matter (says the court) • As a practical matter, workers see little value in this distinction • Perhaps partly due to Reagan’s PATCO actions, ERs began to use and threaten this option increasingly in the 1980s • Not surprisingly, permanent replacement provokes strong feelings on both sides • ERs feel this is a basic right that keeps unions from getting “out of line” • Workers and unions feel this voids any alleged protection for union activity, constitutes “economic capital punishment” and threatens existence • Canadian experience: Bans show no great adverse impact • Clinton’s efforts to ban use of replacements unsuccessful

  12. National Emergency Disputes • Recall Taft-Hartley Act established procedures for strikes (or lockouts) that threaten national safety or health • Procedure and experience under NLRA/LMRA • If President perceives a threat, Attorney General is instructed to seek temporary injunction; Note independent role for courts • 80-day “cooling off” period -- injunctions put strike “on hold” while mediation and fact finding efforts proceed • It’s “open-ended”: No clear statutory guidance beyond President’s report to Congress. The “or else” threat: What will Congress do? • Used less than once a year, not recently (not since 1978 coal strike?) • Maybe the “or else” (uncertainty) threat works; parties usually settle before cooling-off period ends • RLA provisions (railroads and airlines) • Encourage intervention more routinely -- emergency boards “overused” • Better experience in recent years -- less use

  13. Other Strike-Related Issues • Additional legal matters • Common situs (site) picketing and reserve gate doctrine • Ally doctrine • Other primary-secondary quagmires and exceptions • Bankruptcy laws vs. labor relations laws • Legal and philosophical questions • Is there a right to strike? • Natural law, constitutional, statutory, common law? • Some contend that “natural law” assures right to strike • Constitution protects free speech,assembly, and limits involuntary servitude, but do these combine to protect strike actions? • Common law: Court decisions have over the years consistently recognized a right to strike (e.g., Commonwealth vs. Hunt, 1842) • NLRA/LMRA at least implicitly recognizes a general right to strike by spelling out restrictions and their specificity

More Related