1 / 36

Demographic dynamics and evolution of parental care

Demographic dynamics and evolution of parental care. Cinthia „the fixed point girl“ Cristian „less equations“ Danilo „not a spider“ Katharina „of the many colours and the pretty boxes“ Marcos „saving us from starvation“ Vitor „the evil spirit“. Group 5. Male parenting. Rare behaviour.

louis
Download Presentation

Demographic dynamics and evolution of parental care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Demographic dynamics and evolution of parental care Cinthia „the fixed point girl“ Cristian „less equations“ Danilo „not a spider“ Katharina „of the many colours and the pretty boxes“ Marcos „saving us from starvation“ Vitor „the evil spirit“ Group 5

  2. Male parenting Rare behaviour Iporangaia pustolosa

  3. Caringmales • Attractfemales • Increase offspring survival • Decreased bodyconditions • Non-caringmales • Lessattractivetofemales • Betterbodyconditions

  4. Questions • How does female preference affect the dynamics? • Is male parental care evolutionarystable?

  5. hatching abandon- ment death NC NN death mating birth

  6. one model to rule them all

  7. Male dynamics r-f2 r-f1 r-fk rα r r r f0 f2 f1 fk-1 NN NC(1) NC(2) NC(k) γαp μ μ μ μ γ f – mating rate r – fraction of hatching clutches μ – death rate γ – abandonment rate α– number of viable male offspring per clutch p – probability of survival for abandonned clutches

  8. Mating male mating pool: NN NC(1) * r NC(2) * r ... NC(k-1) * r female mating pool: F = ε *Nt β0 β1 β2 βk-1 ε – fraction of available females βi– femalepreference for classi

  9. Mating number of matings in each class: where => sum of all matings = F

  10. One model to rule them all No analyticalsolutions Numericalsimulations γ – abandonment rate μ – death rate r – fraction of hatching clutches f – mating rate

  11. One model to rule them all Abandonning males Birthofabandonedeggs Released males Birthofcaredeggs Availablefemales α – number of viable male offspring per clutch p – probability of survival for abandoned clutches K – carrying capacity ε – fraction of females available for mating

  12. Assumptions Death rate is constant Bodycondition does notaffect male survival Abandonment rates are constant Lastclassalwaysabandons Mating rate is a functionoffemalepreference Femaleavailability is proportional to numberof males Each male has max. one clutch at a time

  13. Parametervalues r = 0.2 μ = 0.2 γ = 0.1 α =10 p =0.3 K= 500 ε = 0.3 β = varying

  14. k = 3 b0 = b1 = b2 = 1

  15. How does female preference affect the number of individuals in the caring classes?

  16. How does female preference affect the number of individuals in the caring classes?

  17. How does female preference affect the number of individuals in the caring classes?

  18. How does female preference affect the number of individuals in the caring classes?

  19. How does female preference affect the number of individuals in the caring classes?

  20. How does female preference affect the number of individuals in the caring classes?

  21. „class collapse“ NN = NN = NN = NN NCt = NCt = NCt = NCt

  22. „class collapse“ Abandonning males Birthofabandonedeggs Released males Birthofcaredeggs = - F Availablefemales

  23. „class collapse“ No analyticalsolutions Numericalsimulations = F

  24. „class collapse“

  25. „class collapse“ Equilibria: Nc = 0 Nn = 0 => which fixed point is stable depends on parameters

  26. Evolution of male care • Different mortality of abandoned eggs • Female preference (body condition & care) • two populations with three caring classes each • 2 times 4 equations • different abandonment rates • good fathers: gamma = 0.2 • bad fathers: gamma = 1

  27. Evolution of care vs. egg mortality

  28. dashed – bad fathers solid – good fathers => good fathers go extinct egg mortality = 0.2 gammabad = 0.8 gammagood = 0.2

  29. dashed – bad fathers solid – good fathers => bad fathers go extinct egg mortality = 0.2 gammabad = 0.8 gammagood = 0.2

  30. dashed – bad fathers • solid – good fathers • good fathers go extinct • equal to no preference egg mortality = 0.2 gammabad = 0.8 gammagood = 0.2

  31. dashed – bad fathers • solid – good fathers • bad fathers go extinct • dynamics change egg mortality = 0.2 gammabad = 0.8 gammagood = 0.2

  32. Conclusion How does female preference affect the dynamics? • no change in ratio of NN/NC • change in the distribution of the NC-classes

  33. Conclusions Is male parental care evolutionary stable? • success of parental care is dependent on survival rate of the abandoned eggs • female preference can determine if „good“ or „bad“ fathers evolve

  34. What’s next? NN NC1 NC2 NC3

  35. My preciousss!!!

More Related