Three problems with economics an elaboration of thomas lovejoy s foreward
Download
1 / 30

John Gowdy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 391 Views
  • Updated On :

Three Problems with Economics: An Elaboration of Thomas Lovejoy’s “Foreward” 1. Valuation 2. Substitution 3. Discounting Neoclassical Sustainability

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'John Gowdy' - lotus


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Three problems with economics an elaboration of thomas lovejoy s foreward l.jpg
Three Problems with Economics: An Elaboration of Thomas Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • 1. Valuation

  • 2. Substitution

  • 3. Discounting


Neoclassical sustainability l.jpg
Neoclassical Sustainability Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • “Weak Sustainability” is based on the belief that what matters for future generations is per capita income, maintained by the total stock of capital.


Slide3 l.jpg

Welfare = Net National Product Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

(rate of return on capital stock)

Total Capital Investment


Valuation the environment as a commodity l.jpg
Valuation: The Environment as a Commodity Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • Emphasis of standard environmental economics is putting prices on environmental features so they can be efficiently allocated by markets.

  • Everything has a price and all values are relative.


Strong sustainability daly l.jpg
Strong Sustainability (Daly) Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • Rule 1. Use renewable resources at a rate equal to or less than their natural rate of regeneration.

  • Rule 2. Use non-renewable resources at a rate less than or equal to the rate of technological change (increasing efficiency in use or extraction, or finding new substitutes)

  • Rule 3. Waste flows for the economy should be less than the assimilative capacity of the environment

  • Keeps “natural capital” intact (sort of)


Weak sustainability again l.jpg
Weak sustainability again Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • Partha Dasgupta, Karl-Göran Mäler, Robert Repetto

  • “Capital” must include “natural capital”

  • If GDP is growing by drawing down stocks of forest, fish, … this is like living on savings, this is not weakly sustainable.


Slide7 l.jpg

Net National Product = Hicksian income Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

Natural Capital

Manufactured

Capital

Human

Capital

We’re growing by destroying this.


How close is this to daly s strong sustainability l.jpg
How close is this to Daly’s strong sustainability? Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • On the surface it’s about the same.

  • But there are some major issues:

  • 1. Substitutability between natural and human made capital.

  • 2. Hicksian income as social well-being (income broadly defined to include everything that gives people “utility”.


Ecological sustainability l.jpg
Ecological Sustainability Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • Protect the life support systems of the planet – clean water, clean air, biodiversity and climate stability

  • Recognize the connection between social stability and environmental stability

  • Recognize the critical dependence of the industrial economy on fossil fuel energy and the array of environmental and geopolitical problems this causes


Discounting and global warming policy l.jpg
Discounting and Global Warming Policy Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • The Nicholas Stern Review 2007

  • The discussion among conventional economists (Dasgupta, Nordhaus, and Weitzman, for example) has focused on the choice of a discount rate.


The discount rate drives the policy recommendations l.jpg
The discount rate drives the policy recommendations Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • Nordhaus concludes that we should take a go slow approach to climate change mitigation because he uses a relatively high discount rate. (3%)

  • Stern concludes that we should take an aggressive approach to climate change mitigation because he uses a low discount rate. (1.4%)


The components of the discount rate l.jpg
The components of the discount rate Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • r = α + η g

  • α “pure time preference” how do we value the well-being of future generations

  • η the “elasticity of consumption”

  • g the growth rate of income (or well-being, or social welfare)

  • If g is growing people will be better off in the future (richer)


The growth rate of consumption g l.jpg
The growth rate of consumption (g) Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • Can be considered to be the same as productivity growth

  • May be negative if environmental and natural resource degradation is taken into account.


The evolution of weak sustainability l.jpg
The evolution of weak sustainability Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • 1st keep per capita income (g) growing (or at least non-declining)

  • 2nd keep the capital stock used to produce income intact

  • 3rd include the services of nature as part of the capital stock


What is g l.jpg
What is g? Lovejoy’s “Foreward”

  • How well off will future generations be?

  • Weak sustainability (Dasgupta/Mäler) – g is equal to the growth rate of total factor productivity.

  • A = TFP = ΔQ – aΔK – bΔL - cΔNK

  • When natural capital is included, several studies have found that g (TFP) is negative, that is, we’re maintaining economic growth by drawing down the services of nature.


Convergence of the policy recommendations of ecological and environmental economics l.jpg
Convergence of the policy recommendations of ecological and environmental economics

  • When past environmental destruction is taken into account, the discount rate will be negative.

  • They will have fewer economic resources with which to deal with environmental change.

  • We should sacrifice more consumption today to compensate those in the future because they will be poorer due to our past and current activities.


Neoclassical politics l.jpg
Neoclassical politics environmental economics

  • The virtuous neoclassical economists (Arrow, Dasgupta, Mäler, Stern) use the standard model to support strong public environmental policy. (comes from a very low or even negative discount rate)

  • The evil neoclassical economists use the same model to argue for weak public environmental polices.


Substitution and sustainability l.jpg
Substitution and Sustainability environmental economics

  • An economy is sustainable if

  • Z = [(S/Y) – (δM/Y) - (δN/Y)] > 0

  • Z is an index of sustainability

  • S is savings

  • Y is national income

  • δM is the depreciation of manufactured capital

  • δN is the depreciation of natural capital

  • This is the World Bank’s “Genuine Savings” indicator (Pearce and Atkinson)


Nauru and weak sustainability l.jpg
Nauru and Weak Sustainability environmental economics

  • Nauru is a tiny island in the South Pacific

  • Phosphate was discovered on Nauru in 1900

  • During the past 100 years, almost the entire island was rendered uninhabitable by phosphate mining

  • “natural capital” was transformed in “financial capital”

  • In the 1980s Nauru’s trust fund amounted to more than $1 billion US.

  • Calculations show that it was “weakly sustainable”


Nauru in the mid 1990s l.jpg
Nauru in the mid-1990s environmental economics

  • $1 billion trust fund

  • Population was about 5,000 Nauruans

  • Free education (higher education in Australia)

  • Free health care

  • Highest per capita income in the world

  • No one had to work


Nauru today l.jpg
Nauru today environmental economics

  • Trust fund disappeared because of bad investments, corruption, and the Asian financial meltdown of the 1990s

  • Now Nauru has no natural resources, its environment has been devastated, and it has no source of income

  • Shows that you can’t substitute back and forth between “natural” and “economic” kinds of capital.


Nauru example l.jpg
Nauru example environmental economics

  • Shows that destroying ecosystems and other features of the natural world is irreversible.

  • Ultimately, nature and money are not substitutes.


The nauruization of the global economy l.jpg
The Nauruization of the Global Economy environmental economics

  • Staggering numbers on recent economic losses

  • The increasing importance of “finance” in the economy

  • Fragility of stocks of capital

  • Fragility of the entire socio-economic system


The economic crisis economics and sustainability l.jpg
The economic crisis: environmental economicseconomics and sustainability

  • Positive lessons:

  • Rational economic man is a poor model of human behavior

  • The need for government to protect the social good.

  • Money is not a substitute for nature


The current crisis and economic growth two views l.jpg
The current crisis and economic growth – Two views environmental economics

  • “As the economy is currently structured economic growth is essential to well-being. We need to forget about protecting the environment for a while and start producing things again.”

    Or,


Slide28 l.jpg

“The current economic crisis, along with the overwhelming evidence of the impending reorganization of the earth’s climate, and the impending catastrophic loss of biodiversity, calls for a fundamental reorganization of human society.”


What s important and what isn t l.jpg
What’s important and what isn’t? evidence of the impending reorganization of the earth’s climate, and the impending catastrophic loss of biodiversity, calls for a fundamental reorganization of human society.”

  • “How much money would it take to wipe out world poverty, guarantee universal health care, stabilize population growth, and roll back the ravages of global warming”

  • $190 billion a year (Lester Brown)

  • AIG bailout alone - $170 billion (so far)

  • Value of credit default swaps - $41 trillion


Economics ethics and politics l.jpg
Economics, Ethics, and Politics evidence of the impending reorganization of the earth’s climate, and the impending catastrophic loss of biodiversity, calls for a fundamental reorganization of human society.”

  • “True crises are those difficulties that cannot be resolved within the framework of the system, but instead can be overcome only by going outside of and beyond the historical system of which the difficulties are a part.” Immanuel Wallerstein, World Systems Analysis, p. 76

  • “No matter how cynical you get it’s hard to keep up.” Woody Allen


ad