Continental drift the theory l.jpg
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 53

Continental Drift- The Theory PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: General

Continental Drift- The Theory. The Earth’s crust is broken into about 12 rigid plates, which slide over a semi-molten plastic layer of the mantle. Tectonic Plates on Modern Earth. There are three types of plate boundaries:. 1- Convergent 2- Divergent 3- Transform.

Download Presentation

Continental Drift- The Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Continental Drift-The Theory

The Earth’s crust is broken into about 12 rigid plates, which slide over a semi-molten plastic layer of the mantle.

Tectonic Plates on Modern Earth

There are three types of plate boundaries:

  • 1- Convergent

  • 2- Divergent

  • 3- Transform

1. Convergent (aka subduction zone) boundaries – where one plate overrides another plate. Each plate is bounded by some combination of these three plate boundary types.

2. Divergent (aka spreading) boundaries – where plates are moving apart

3. Transform fault boundaries – where plates are moving past each other

The material making up the plates can be divided in two types:

i. Oceanic crust

ii. Continental crust

The driving force for plate tectonics is slow moving convection currents in the underlying

plastic mantle material.

  • lava lamp!

How does convection work? No one knows—but they aren’t afraid to propose models!

Whole-mantle convection

Two mantle convection cells

Complex convection

The History of the Theory of Continental Drift

1600 - development of a comprehensive world map (missing details of some continents such as

Australia and Antarctica).

1620 - Francis Bacon noted the similarity of the shape of the continents on either side of the

Southern Atlantic – Africa and South America.

1666 - Francois Placet suggested that prior to the Great Flood the land was undivided by

oceans and that the Atlantic formed when Atlantis sank.

1858 - Antonio Snider developed a theory that when the Earth cooled from a molten mass

continents formed only on one side. This created instability causing the Americas to be

pulled away from the rest of the continents.

1879 – Sir George Darwin said that the Pacific Ocean was the scar left behind when the Moon

pulled away from the Earth. After this happened, the continents moved to create a

balanced planet.

1890s- Edward Suess suggested that at one stage all the continents were joined as one massive

continent, which he called Gondwana. His evidence for this was the location of

mountain ranges and common fossils.

1924 - Alfred Wegener developed the theory of Continental Drift to explain the similarities of

rocks, fossils and other geological structures on either side of the Atlantic. At this time it

was accepted that the continents sat like icebergs on the mantle and as the continents

eroded they rose out of the mantle. Wegener suggested as well as moving up and down

in the mantle, continents could move sideways in the mantle.

-Wegener was a meteorologist and his theory was not well accepted. (He died on an

expedition in Greenland collecting ice samples).

1928 - Arthur Holmes suggested that convection currents in the mantle as the driving force of

continental drift. He had no evidence to support his theory.

1950s- Extensive mapping of the ocean floor, especially the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.

1960s- Harry Hess suggested that sea floor separates at the mid-oceans ridges and new sea floor

is created by up welling of the mantle.

1970s- Theory of plate tectonics well accepted.

Earth ~200 million years ago

Day 2

Continental Drift: Evidence

  • Geographic fit of South America and Africa

  • Fossils match across oceans

  • Rock types and structures match across oceans

  • Ancient glacial features

  • Earthquake Patterns

  • Volcano Patterns




Tight fit of

the continents, especially using

continental shelves.

Continental Drift: Evidence

Fossil critters and plants

Continental Drift: Evidence

Correlation of mountains with nearly

identical rocks and structures




Glacial features

of the same age

restore to a

tight polar


The Rise of Plate Tectonics

WW II and the Cold War: Military Spending

U.S. Navy mapped seafloor with echo sounding (sonar) to find and hide submarines. Generalized maps showed:

oceanic ridges—submerged mountain ranges

fracture zones—cracks perpendicular to ridges

trenches—narrow, deep gashes

abyssal plains—vast flat areas

seamounts—drowned undersea islands

Dredged rocks of the seafloor included only basalt, gabbro, and serpentinite—no continental materials.

The Rise of Plate Tectonics

Hypothesis: Stripes indicate periodic reversal of the direction of Earth’s magnetic field.

To test this hypothesis, scientists determined the eruptive ages AND the polarity of young basalts using the newly developed technique of K-Ar radiometric dating.

The study validated the reversal hypothesis...

The Rise of

Plate Tectonics

And then (1962-1963) geologists realized that the patterns are SYMMETRICAL across oceanic ridges.

The K-Ar dates

show the youngest

rocks at the ridge.

The Rise of Plate Tectonics

Meanwhile, U.S. military developed new, advanced seismometers to monitor Soviet nuclear tests.

By the late 1950s, seismometers had been deployed in over 40 allied countries and was recording 24 hrs/day, 365 days/year.

Besides the occasional nuclear test, it recorded every moderate to large earthquake on the planet. With these high-precision data, seismologists found that activity happens in narrow bands.

Bands of seismicity—chiefly at trenches and oceanic ridges

Divergent boundaries: Chiefly at oceanic ridges

(aka spreading centers)

How magnetic reversals form at a spreading center

Divergent boundaries also can rip apart (“rift”) continents

How rifting of a

continent could lead to formation of

oceanic lithosphere.

e.g., East Africa Rift

e.g., Red Sea

e.g., Atlantic Ocean


Pangea was ripped apart by such continental

rifting & drifting.

Subduction zones form at convergent boundaries if at least one side has oceanic (denser) material.

Modern examples: Andes, Cascades

Major features: trench, biggest EQs, explosive volcanoes

Another subduction zone—this one with

oceanic material on both sides.

Modern example: Japan

Earthquake depth indicates subduction zones

Collison zones form where both sides of a convergent boundary consist of continental (buoyant) material.

Modern example: Himalayas

This probably used to be a subduction zone,

but all the oceanic material was subducted.

Most transform boundaries

are in the oceans.

Some, like the one in California, cut continents.

The PAC-NA plate boundary is MUCH more complex than this diagram shows.

Hotspots, such as the one under Hawaii,

have validated plate tectonic theory.

  • Login