japan s historical occupational structures
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Japan\'s Historical Occupational Structures

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

Japan's Historical Occupational Structures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 94 Views
  • Uploaded on

Japan\'s Historical Occupational Structures. Osamu Saito and Tokihiko Settsu (Hitotsubashi University) 3 July 2009. INCHOS.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Japan's Historical Occupational Structures ' - lottie


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
japan s historical occupational structures

Japan\'s Historical Occupational Structures

Osamu Saito and Tokihiko Settsu

(Hitotsubashi University)

3 July 2009

inchos
INCHOS
  • The international network for the comparative history of occupational structure (INCHOS) was launched in late 2007 by Dr Leigh Shaw-Taylor (HPSS, University of Cambridge) and Professor Osamu Saito (Hitotsubashi University).
  • This followed on from a session at IEHA’s Helsinki meeting in 2006 and a very successful workshop on occupational structure hosted by Hi-Stat at Hitotsubashi University in September 2007.
the aim of inchos
The aim of INCHOS
  • To develop a genuinely comparative history of occupational structure by using a common occupational coding system and common methodologies to ensure commensurable results.
  • Our interest is not in a particular period but on the long-run process of industrialization which means that the focus is on different time periods in different countries.
inchos 2009
INCHOS 2009
  • Conference in Cambridge:

King’s College, 28-31 July

  • Countries covered:

England; Belgium; Germany; France;

The Netherlands; Italy; Spain; Bulgaria;

Japan; Taiwan; India; Indonesia; Russia;

Sweden

an initial set of issues
An initial set of issues
  • Coverage: census and pre-census periods
  • Classification problems:

PST system

Primary

Secondary, including mining

Tertiary

Problem of ‘labourers’ in early censuses

con d
Con’d
  • Female employment

Pre-census data: e.g. baptismal register

Censuses: changes in ways in which female and child labour was recorded

  • By-employment

Individual

When principal employment only, industrial and other forms of non-farm employment may be understated

Household

some broader issues
Some broader issues
  • England’s early modern and modern growth

Manufacturing employment grew in early modern times more substantially than in the classic industrial revolution

  • Tertiary sector

England: its growth more striking than that of secondary employment during the classic industrial revolution

Belgium: a similar growth pattern now emerging from new estimates

con d1
Con’d
  • By-employment

Implications for sectoral labour productivity growth

Sectoral gaps in earlier phases may well have been smaller than previously thought

  • Institutional factors: India’s caste system

could be associated with a greater division of labour in the Smithian sense

but acted as an obstacle to further divisions between intermediate and finished products

our paper
Our paper
  • Focus on by-employment

Farm family by-employment widespread in the latter half of the Tokugawa period.

The pattern could be inverse-U shaped.

  • National income estimates

When the existence of subsidiary workers is taken into account, to what extent will the existing national income estimates be affected?

  • And patterns of sectoral productivity gaps?
slide10
A tentative attempt: with earlier LTES data and coefficients derived from 1879 Yamanashi cross-tabulations
assumptions
Assumptions

1870s

Primary L(P)*0.82+0.5*(L(P)*0.18+(L(S)*0.38+L(T)*0.02)

Secondary L(S)*0.61+0.5*(L(S)*0.39+L(P)*0.11+L(T)*0.01)

Tertiary L(T)*0.97+0.5*(L(T)*0.03+L(P)*0.07+L(S)*0.01)

1925

Primary L(P)*0.9+0.5*(L(P)*0.1)

Secondary L(S)+0.5*(L(P)*0.0667)

Tertiary L(T)+0.5*(L(P)*0.0333)

estimates of principal equivalent gainful workers in pst sectors
Estimates of principal-equivalent gainful workers in PST sectors
  • Tertiary: Settsu estimates
  • Secondary:

Will see if the same model works

For this sector, net output readily available

  • Primary: as residual
actual paths in sectoral productivity growth
Actual paths in sectoral productivity growth
  • The initial gaps in labour productivity between ST and P
  • Did the ST-P gaps increase or decline over the entire prewar period?
ad