1 / 20

Some Reflections on ICT and Policy Implications

Some Reflections on ICT and Policy Implications. Alfonso Gambardella Bocconi University, Milan Geneve June 2 2006. Computer vs Dynamo (Paul David). Rapid technological innovation with slow gains in productivity … Why? In computer like in electricity at the beginning of the XX century

lot
Download Presentation

Some Reflections on ICT and Policy Implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Some Reflections on ICT and Policy Implications Alfonso Gambardella Bocconi University, Milan Geneve June 2 2006

  2. Computer vs Dynamo(Paul David) • Rapid technological innovation with slow gains in productivity … Why? • In computer like in electricity at the beginning of the XX century • Robert Solow: “We see computers everywhere but in the productivity statistics”

  3. Both Computer & Dynamo … • … were nodal elements of a series of future technological improvements • … started during a long productivity slowdown (1890-1913 for the dynamo) • … were seen as the start of amazing new trajectories

  4. Answer • Major technologies put pressures for complementary organizational and institutional changes. This takes time.

  5. Dynamo • By 1899 only 3% households had electric lightening, and 5% factories had electric motors • It took 20 years to reach 50% diffusion • In 1990 only 10% of world firms were using computers

  6. Diffusion of electricity • Pace was largely determined by factory electrification, which had to wait for • reduced electricity price • depreciation of older plants • investment boom (1920s) • Most importantly, benefits depended on several complementary factors … re-design and re-organization of factories

  7. Question, Where are We? • Probably after price reduction, depreciation & investment boom • But my sense is that we have not yet resolved all the complementarity issues • May be more at the level of firms (even though there is more to do) • Definitely at the level of markets/uses (large new markets)

  8. Bryonjolfsson-Hitt (Computing productivity) • Shows empirically that the benefits of firm investments in IT are greater 5-10 years later • Consistent with the view that they require complementary investments • Data on 527 large US firms, 1987-1994

  9. Bresnahan et al, QJE 2001 • Tests “complementarity” among: • IT investments • Worplace organization (WO) • Skilled labor • Find correlation/complementarity among them • Data: • Survey of senior managers in 778 Fortune 1000 firms (about 55% mfr, 45% services)

  10. First policy issue • We need to encourage the formation of complementary resources • Not just for the leading firms (who do it in any case, and have probably already done it) • But for the larger markets (firms, consumers, users)

  11. Let me now move to another related issue • The previous question was: where are we with complementary assets in different industries/firms/users? • Now we ask a related one: how diffused as ICT really been? Definitely not like automobile, at least in many parts of the world • Is ICT going to remain largely an industrial good industry or is it going to become a wider consumer industry?

  12. An example, Domotics • Technology has not developed much since 1995 • Prices are still very high • No new services or interesting innovatons • Why?

  13. An even more important example • Bottom of the pyramid • Is 4 billion people a big enough market?

  14. Can we make it through the computers? • Connectivity • PC Mobile Phone • Connectivity an add-on Core function is to connect • Expensive Cheap • Complicated Easy to use • High maintenance Low maintenance • High Power demand Charge once • Physical Connectivity Wireless • Fixed in space Portable • Primarily data Primarily voice • High bandwidth Low bandwidth From a presentation by Mans Olof Ors, Reuters, at Bocconi University, November 18. 2006

  15. Connectivity • Internet access grows • 2000 2.1% • 2004 6.9% • Mobile usage explodes • 2000 5% • 2004 17.8% • Mobile subscribersDeveloped Countries2000 464m2004 740mDeveloping Countries2000 261m2004 900m Picture: REUTERS From a presentation by Mans Olof Ors, Reuters, at Bocconi University, November 18. 2006

  16. Picture: REUTERS • Mobile phones • 80% of worlds population lives in areas covered by networks • India adds 2 million subscribers per month • Total Indian market is 350 million • An increase of 10 mobile phones per 100 people in African developing countries would increase GDP growth by 0.6 percent. (LSE 2005) Picture: REUTERS From a presentation by Mans Olof Ors, Reuters, at Bocconi University, November 18. 2006

  17. Policy? • Well, the market seem to grow in any case, it’s companies who should pick this up • … creating demand, a Marshall Plan? Needs coordination … in fact coordination is an important policy task here (e.g. standards, promotion) • Give out cell phones to Africa?

  18. Summary & Conclusions • With IT we have moved beyond the first steps, but still lack of complementary assets (at firm and societal level, and of course much more in certain parts of the world than others) • Policy: Support for creation of complementary assets

  19. Summary & Conclusions • The other big issue/question: The industry is an industrial good but not yet a consumer industry • New market expansions can only come through that • Cell phones = consumer industry • Computers = capital good industry • Policy: a classical one, stimulate demand

More Related