1 / 18

The Relationship Between Executive Function and Language Abilities in Grade School Children

The Relationship Between Executive Function and Language Abilities in Grade School Children. By: Jacquelyn Liesen Faculty Mentors: Mrs. Jill Fahy & Dr. Rebecca Throneburg. Executive Functions. High-Order Cognitive abilities Cognitive Processes Attentional Control and Shifting Inhibition

lorie
Download Presentation

The Relationship Between Executive Function and Language Abilities in Grade School Children

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Relationship Between Executive Function and Language Abilities in Grade School Children By: Jacquelyn Liesen Faculty Mentors: Mrs. Jill Fahy & Dr. Rebecca Throneburg

  2. Executive Functions • High-Order Cognitive abilities • Cognitive Processes • Attentional Control and Shifting • Inhibition • Working Memory • Fundamental Components • Goal Selection • Planning/Organizing • Initiation/Persistence • Flexibility/Shifting • Self-monitoring/regulation

  3. Development of Executive Functions & Language Executive Functions • Longest developmental phase in humans • Birth through mid-20s • Developmental spurts correspond with frontal lobe maturity • Attentional and inhibitory control • Rapid development in first few years of life • Planning/organization • Emerging skills throughout childhood • More sophisticated in adolescence • Flexibility/shifting • Emerges in early school-age • Matures in adolescence, early 20s • Self-monitoring • Not fully developed til late adolescence/early 20s Language • Critical period 0-3 • Morphology • Generally mastered by age five • Vocabulary acquisition • Shifts from oral exposure to written exposure • Proceeds throughout school years, adolescence • Syntax • Spoken syntax levels off in early school years • Written syntax becomes more complex

  4. Literature Review: Relationship Between Language and EFs • Few studies in this area • Most involve isolated assessment of EF skills in un-naturalistic environments, with minimal language assessment • Fewer still have evaluated EF behaviors in naturalistic environments • Research has concluded • Children with SLI may have a deficit in working memory (Hoffman & Gillam, Marton & Schwartz) • Significance between preschooler's narrative language abilities and inhibition, working memory, flexibility, and planning (Trainor) • Typically developing adolescents and those with SLI differ in executive functions on the BRIEF (Hughes, Turkstra, and Wulfeck)

  5. Research Questions • What is the relationship between executive functions and receptive language skills in typically developing children ages six and eight years of age? • What is the relationship between executive functions and expressive language skills in typically developing children ages six and eight years of age? • What is the relationship between executive functions and structure language skills in typically developing children ages six and eight years of age? • What is the relationship between executive functions and content language skills in typically developing children ages six and eight years of age?

  6. Subjects • Attending a school in Central Illinois in a regular education classroom

  7. Assessment Measures: Language • Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-4 • Receptive language • Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-4 • Language skills • Core Language Score • Expressive Language Index • Receptive Language Index • Language Content Index • Language Structure Index • Working Memory Index

  8. Assessment Measures: Executive Functions • Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functions – Parent Form • Parents’ rating of executive function ability in naturalistic environment • Initiate • Working Memory • Plan/Organize • Organization of Materials • Monitor • Inhibit Control • Shift Control • Emotional Control • Global Executive Composite • T-scores of 65 and above indicate clinical significance/area of concern

  9. Results • Means and Standard Deviations of BRIEF Standard scores represented as T-scores with mean of 50 and a SD of +/-15. T-scores c>65 are considered clinically significant (higher score = more impairment)

  10. Results • Means and Standard Deviations of CELF Mean=100. Typical performance = +/- SD of 15

  11. Results • Means and Standard Deviations of PPVT Mean=100. Typical performance = +/- SD of 15

  12. Relationship between PPVT and BRIEF Parent No significant correlations

  13. Sig at the * = .05 ** = .01 level Relationship between BRIEF &CELF

  14. Clinical Implications • Suggests that expressive communication skills engage not only semantics & syntax, but also EFs. • Expressive language skills are particularly related to planning and organizing, shifting, monitoring, and initiating • Indicate children with weak expressive language skills may also have weak executive function skills. • Successful use of compensatorystrategiesis dependent upon the presence of intact executive functions • Speech-language pathologists should assess children’s executive functions in addition to language • Avoid assuming that intact executive function skills are available to compensate for weak language skills

  15. Limitations • Small sample with similar demographics. • Executive function behaviors are based on parent report only, without use of direct measures. • Did not assess language in naturalistic environments

  16. Future research • Similar research to validate findings • Subtypes of children with specific language impairment (semantic, syntactic) • Treatment of executive functions for children with language impairments

  17. References • Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 71-82. • Anderson, V. A., Anderson, P., Northam, E., Jacobs, R., & Catroppa, C. (2001). Development of executive functions through late childhood and adolescence in and australian sample. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 385-406. • Dunn, L., & Dunn, D. (Ed.). (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test, fourth edition. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments. • Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychology, 6, 235-238. • Hoffman, L. M., & Gillam, R. B. (2004). Verbal and spatial information processing constraints in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 114-125. doi: 1092-4388/04/4701-0114 • Hughes, D. M., Turkstra, L. S., & Wulfeck, B. B. (2009). Parent and self-ratings of executive function in adolescents with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44(6), 901-916 doi: 10.3109/13682820802425693

  18. References • Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2006). Processing limitations in children with specific language impairment: The role of executive function. Child Development, 77, 1822-1841. • Marton, K., & Schwartz, R. G. (2003). Working memory capacity and language processes in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1138-1153. doi: 1092-4388/03/4605-1138 • Richard, G. J., & Fahy, J. K. (2005). The source for development of executive functions. East Moline, Illinois: Linguisystems. • Trainor, K. (2010). The relationship between preschool executive function skills and oral narrative skills. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication Disorders and Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois. • Ye, Z., & Zhou, X. (2009). Executive control in language processing. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 1168-1177. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.003.

More Related