The national special education research agenda inside the matrix l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 48

The National Special Education Research Agenda: Inside the Matrix PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 73 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The National Special Education Research Agenda: Inside the Matrix. The National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in the Institute of Education Sciences (IES): But… What exactly is the Institute of Education Sciences? (And, what happened to OSERS and OSEP?).

Download Presentation

The National Special Education Research Agenda: Inside the Matrix

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The national special education research agenda inside the matrix l.jpg

The National Special Education Research Agenda: Inside the Matrix


Slide2 l.jpg

The National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in the Institute of Education Sciences (IES): But…What exactly is the Institute of Education Sciences? (And, what happened to OSERS and OSEP?)


Idea reauthorization in 2004 l.jpg

IDEA Reauthorization in 2004

  • Amended the The Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 to establish the National Center for Special Education Research in the Institute of Education Sciences (IES)

  • Transferred responsibility for special education research and “Studies and Evaluations” (except for the Annual Report) from the Office of Special Education Programs to NCSER.


The charge legislative branch l.jpg

The Charge: Legislative Branch

Research, statistical, and evaluation activities supported by the Institute shall “apply rigorous, systematic, and objective methodology to obtain reliable and valid knowledge … and present findings and make claims that are appropriate to and supported by the methods that have been employed.” (ESRA, 2002)


Ies goals l.jpg

IES Goals

  • develop or identify programs, practices, policies, and approaches that enhance academic achievement and that can be widely deployed

  • identify what does not work and what is problematic, and thereby encourage innovation and further research

  • gain fundamental understanding of the processes that underlie variations in the effectiveness of education programs

  • develop delivery systems for the results of education research that will be routinely used by practitioners and the public when making education decisions


Organizational structure l.jpg

Organizational Structure

Office of the Director

Grover J. Whitehurst, Director

National Board for Education Sciences

Robert C. Granger,

Chair

Sonia Chessen,

Executive Director

Office of Communication and Outreach

Mike Bowler,

Director of Communications and Outreach

Office of Administration and Policy

Sue Betka,

Deputy Director for Administration and Policy

Office of Science

Andrew White,

Deputy Director for Science

Office of Information Technology

Gerald Malitz,

Chief Information Technology Officer


Organizational structure7 l.jpg

Organizational Structure

Office of the Director

Grover J. Whitehurst, Director

National Board for Education Sciences

Robert C. Granger,

Chair

Sonia Chessen,

Executive Director

National Center for Education Statistics

Mark Schneider,

Commissioner

National Center for Education Research

Lynn Okagaki,

Commissioner

National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance

Phoebe Cottingham,

Commissioner

National Center for Special Education Research

Edward J. Kame’enui,

Commissioner


Slide8 l.jpg

The National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in The Institute of Education Sciences (IES):In Appreciation of Hartley’s First Law


Hartley s first law l.jpg

Hartley’s First Law

You can lead a horse to water,

but if you can get him to float on his back, you’ve got something.

Bloch, A. (1982). Murphy’s law and other reasons why things go wrong. LA: Price/Stern/Sloan Publishers, Inc.


Five organizing principles l.jpg

Five Organizing Principles

for

National Center for Special Education Research in the

Institute of Education Sciences


Ncser organizing principles l.jpg

NCSER Organizing Principles

1. The “science” must come first--


Slide12 l.jpg

Ode to Feynman

This phenomenon of having a memory for the race, of having an accumulated knowledge passable from one generation to another, was new in the world. But it had a disease in it. It was possible to pass on mistaken ideas. It was possible to pass on ideas which were not profitable for the race… Then a way of avoiding the disease was discovered… And that is what science is: the result of the discovery that it is worthwhile rechecking by new direct experience, and not necessarily trusting the race experience from the past (p. 185).

Richard P. Feynman (1999). The pleasure of finding things out.

Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.


Slide13 l.jpg

“We’ve done well…now there’s an opportunity to really be amazing--to be amazing as a business, to be amazing in the positive impact that we have on society. But we have to do some things a little bit differently to be as amazing as we hope we can be.” Steve Ballmer, CEO, MicrosoftBusiness Week, June 17, 2002 (http://www.business week.com/magazine/content/02_24/b3787001.htm)

Invoking the Ballmer Standard


Ncser organizing principles14 l.jpg

NCSER Organizing Principles

1. The “science” must come first--and it must be the best, perhaps even “amazing.”


Methodological statistical issues l.jpg

Methodological & Statistical Issues

  • Traditional issues: Highly nested nature of student performance in complex systems that provoke complex interactions among range of variables (familial, social, pedagogical, curricular, organizational) compounded by heterogeneity of student characteristics/performance; comorbidity.

  • Quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) of single-case research to identify effective educational interventions;

  • Statistical power for random assignment evaluations of programs and interventions; etc.


Evidence based education l.jpg

Evidence-based Education

  • Using the best available empirical evidence in making decisions about education

-- Particularly for students with disabilities


Ies ncser practice ta d l.jpg

IES NCSER + Practice (TA & D)

Simple Formula

1.R - TA & D = Irrelevant

2.TA & D - R = Irresponsible

3.R + TA & D = Relevant & Responsible

What Does This Mean?

  • Levels of evidence process & mechanisms


Levels of evidence on what works l.jpg

Levels of Evidence on What Works

  • Meta-analyses of high quality evidence

  • Experiments and well designed quasi-experiments using WWC standards (including small n designs)

  • Statistical modeling of correlational and longitudinal data

  • Best practice studies with matching and contrastive analysis

  • Expert opinion supported by conceptual models and generalizations from high quality research on related topics

  • Simple correlational studies, case studies, pre-post studies, and best practice studies w/o matching


What can cec do l.jpg

What Can CEC Do?

  • Establish a “Scientific Advisory Council” to anchor the primacy of science in CEC

  • Advocate & insist upon rigorous scientific standards in special education research + TA & D (and within organization)

  • Adopt levels of evidence to adjudicate/promote research-to-practice translation

  • Launch a public awareness campaign to inform parents about importance of science


President s fy 2006 education final appropriations in millions of dollars l.jpg

President’s FY 2006 Education Final Appropriations (in millions of dollars)

  • Title I Grants to LEAs = $12,713 million (largest portion of NCLB programs)

  • Reading First/Early Reading First = $1,132 million

  • Research in special education and studies and evaluation = $82 million (0.11% of total ED monies)

  • Total Education Appropriation = $71,545 million

    Reference: http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget06/06action.pdf


Comparison of fy2006 appropriations with other federal agencies millions of dollars l.jpg

Comparison Agency

Defense Budget Authority = $419,341

Homeland Security Authority= $34,152

Secret Service Agency = $1,200

Environmental Protection Agency = $7,571

Total Federal Budget = $2,568 (in billions of dollars)

Comparative % for NCSER ($82 million):

0.02% monies authorized as compared to DOD

0.24% of monies authorized as compared to DHS

6.83% of monies authorized as compared to Secret Service Agency

1.08% of monies authorized as compared with the EPA

0.003% of total monies authorized

Comparison of FY2006 Appropriations with other Federal agencies (millions of dollars)

Reference: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy06/browse.html


Federal research and development spending proposed fy 2006 l.jpg

Federal Research and Development Spending (Proposed: FY 2006)

  • Total Across Federal Agencies = $132,304 million

  • Federal agencies include: DOD, HHS, NASA, DOE, NSF, USDA, DHS, DOC, DOT, DVA, DOI, EPA, and Other

  • “R&D” is characterized as “basic research, applied research, development, R& D equipment or R&D facilities”.

  • NCSER Appropriation = $81.7 million (0.06% of R&D monies)

  • Reference: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2006/budget.html


Ncser organizing principles23 l.jpg

NCSER Organizing Principles

2. Because the special education “problem space” is infinitely broad and complex, we must invest wisely and strategically.


To do so requires going inside the special education matrix l.jpg

To do so requires going “inside” the Special Education Matrix

What Special Education Matrix?


Features of ncser research matrix l.jpg

Features of NCSER Research Matrix

NCSER Statutory responsibilities: 18

Disability Statutory categories: 12+

Total Research Matrix cells: 18 x 12= 216


Matrix of disability category by ncser duties l.jpg

Matrix of Disability Category by NCSER Duties


Ncser evidence map just one of 216 cells l.jpg

Disability Category: Specific Learning Disabilities

Age—Growth & Development x Time

Content

(1)

Infants/

Toddlers

(2)

Pre-school

(3)

Kinder-garten

(4)-(6) Grades 1

through 3

(7)—(16)

Grades 4 through 12

(17)—(25)

School to post-school, post-secondary, etc.

Early Childhood

School Age

Transition

(1) Speech and Language Development

(2) Beginning Reading (Learning to Read)

(3) Content Reading

(Reading to Learn)

(4) Etc.

NCSER Evidence Map: Just One of 216 Cells


Fy 2006 ncser research programs l.jpg

FY 2006 NCSER Research Programs

  • Reading & Writing Special Education Research

  • Math & Science Special Education Research

  • Special Education Teacher Quality – Reading/Writing

  • Special Education Teacher Quality – Math/Science

  • Early Intervention and Assessment for Young Children with Disabilities


Fy 2006 ncser programs cont d l.jpg

FY 2006 NCSER Programs (cont’d)

  • Assessment for Accountability Special Education Research

  • Individualized Education Programs Research

  • Serious Behavior Disorders Special Education Research

  • Secondary and Post-Secondary Outcomes Special Education Research

  • Language and Vocabulary Development Special Education Research


Fy 2007 grant competitions l.jpg

FY 2007 Grant Competitions

  • Early Intervention, Early Childhood Special Education, and Assessment for Young Children with Disabilities

  • Mathematics and Science

  • Reading, Writing, and Language

  • Serious Behavior Disorders

  • Assessment for Accountability


Fy 2007 grant competitions31 l.jpg

FY 2007 Grant Competitions

  • Individualized Education Programs and Individualized Family Service Plans

  • Secondary and Transition Services

  • Quality of Teacher and Other Service Providers for Students with Disabilities

  • Autism Spectrum Disorders

  • Response to Intervention


R esearch grant program goals l.jpg

Research Grant Program Goals

Goals differ by topic area, and include:

  • Goal 1: Identifyingpromising practices.

  • Goal 2: Developing and testing new approaches.

  • Goal 3: Conducting efficacy and replication trials.

  • Goal 4: Conducting large scale evaluations.

  • Goal 5: Developing and validating assessments.


Ncser organizing principles33 l.jpg

NCSER Organizing Principles

3. Research in “special education” is at the heart of the National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in IES.


Public law 108 446 december 3 2004 118 stat 2647 108 th congress l.jpg

Public Law 108-446—December 3, 2004 118 STAT. 2647 - 108th Congress

USC 1401 Sec. 602. DEFINITIONS

  • “(29) SPECIAL EDUCATION.—The term ‘special education’ means specially designed instruction, at no cost to parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability, including—

    • “(A) instruction conducted in the classroom, in the home, in hospitals and institutions, and in other settings; and

    • “(b) instruction in physical education.


Specially designed instruction l.jpg

NOT

special institutions

teaching strategies

curricular programs

special support

special learning

general programs

Design = Architecture of information

Individualized Education Program (IEP)

AND “Related Services”

Families

Specially Designed Instruction


Ncser organizing principles36 l.jpg

NCSER Organizing Principles

4. Building the research capacity of the field is not a “Lone Ranger” endeavor: Collaboration and consultation are essential.


The charge customers l.jpg

The Charge: Customers

  • Make research more practical

  • Fill gaps in knowledge

  • Provide digested and vetted findings

  • Consider products for end users

  • Consider expanding current IES research grammar and goal structure


Office of special education and rehabilitative services osers l.jpg

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS)

Dr. Troy Justesen, Deputy Assistant Secretary

Dr. Alexa E. Posny, Director, Office of Special Education Programs

(OSEP)

Dr. Lou Danielson, Director of Research to Practice

Division

John Hager, Assistant Secretary


Ode to boren s first law l.jpg

Ode to Boren’s First Law

5. Good science is good “business” for everyone; but good science is not enough. Results must lead to the engineering of high quality performance and delivery systems.


Slide40 l.jpg

“Why the Global Economy Is Here To Stay”

Jeffrey E. Garten, Dean, Yale School of Management

(Business Week, March 23, 1998, p. 21)

Delivering some 2.8 million packages in 210 countries each day, FedEx is pushing globalization faster and deeper…because it is using information technology to reengineer its clients’ worldwide supply and distribution systems…FedEx can…electronically track where any shipment is at any given moment, and it can guarantee on-time delivery.


Slide41 l.jpg

“Cream of the Crop,” Alison Peacock.

Horizon Air, April, 1998, p. 12-17.

“A computerized system keeps track of how much milk each cow gives each time. Obrist can look up any cow on his computer and track her milking yields for weeks at a time, noting at a glance when she is at peak production or if her health is ailing” (p. 13).


Engineering systems l.jpg

Engineering Systems

IT Systems (including digital technology) that permit, for example:

  • the large scale, real time management of a range of student performance data at the district, school, and classroom levels, including the real time management of individualized education programs (e.g., FedEx; Dairy Farmers);

  • greater and faster accessibility to the full range of print materials;

  • accountability and information management systems linked to student performance and results


Five harsh realities to hartley s first law l.jpg

Five Harsh Realities to Hartley’s First Law


Harsh realities l.jpg

Harsh Realities

  • We have more cells than research dollars. Most cells are either empty or partially filled. None of the cells are completely filled. Where should NCSER make investments for the short and long term? What organizing principles and values should guide these decisions?

  • Space and time is at least three-dimensional: Investments must reflect a long-term horizontal view (breadth) with vertical short-term investments (depth) that vary over time, complimented with diagonal investments when possible/feasible (depending on quality of research from field).


Harsh realities cont d l.jpg

Harsh Realities (Cont’d)

  • What is the capacity of the field to deliver the research “goods”? The quality of the research infrastructure and capacity is essential to good science and research.

    Needed: Short and long-term investments in building professional capacity that is interdisciplinary, rigorous, and content intensive in special education as a primary discipline.


Harsh realities cont d46 l.jpg

Harsh Realities (cont’d)

  • What is the capacity of the U.S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) to deliver the goods?

  • What are the mechanisms for obtaining input from the field—individuals and parents/ caregivers of children and individuals with disabilities, professional organizations, stakeholders and the general public—on the research investments?


Stockmayer s theorem l.jpg

Stockmayer’s Theorem

If it looks easy, it’s tough.

If it looks tough, it’s damn well impossible.

Bloch, A. (1982). Murphy’s law and other reasons why things go wrong. LA: Price/Stern/Sloan Publishers, Inc.


The home of evidence based education l.jpg

The home of

evidence-based education


  • Login