1 / 10

CMA Program Delivery Assessment April 9, 2010

CMA Program Delivery Assessment April 9, 2010. Program Delivery. What is it? How are we doing? How can NCTPA & Member Jurisdictions deliver projects?. What is it?. Local Streets and Roads Funding. What is it?. Transit Funding. What is it?. Funding for Improvements. How are we doing?.

loren
Download Presentation

CMA Program Delivery Assessment April 9, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CMA Program Delivery Assessment April 9, 2010

  2. Program Delivery • What is it? • How are we doing? • How can NCTPA & Member Jurisdictions deliver projects?

  3. What is it? Local Streets and Roads Funding

  4. What is it? Transit Funding

  5. What is it? Funding for Improvements

  6. How are we doing? Funding Limited • 30 year Low in Transportation Financing • Continue to under invest in our Transit, Highway and Local Road Systems (Maintaining our System) • What can we deliver on Transportation 2035? Funding Challenge • Transit Capital and Local Street and Roads Shortfalls • Under Funded Major Capital Projects • Regional Program Impact on Local Project Delivery • Number of Funding Programs – Fragmentation Allocations

  7. How can NCTPA & Member Jurisdictions deliver projects? • Funding Sources: • Optimization of Staffing Resources both at CMA and MTC • Appropriate Program Placement • Agreement on Outcome of Program • Continuation of Infrastructure Improvements • Limit Disagreements on “Responsibility” • Streamline Project Delivery

  8. How can NCTPA & Member Jurisdictions deliver projects? (cont.) • Continuation of Block Grant Program w/Flexibility • Special Consideration and Maximum Flexibility for Smaller Size CMAs • Consolidation of funding programs and reduce fragmentation • Develop a truly “unified “call-for-projects” process that minimizes redundancy.

  9. Parting Thoughts! • Most programs have been added onto so many times that they have become convoluted and difficult to understand and navigate. • Napa gets a taste – but it is mostly based on size and politics. • It often takes multiple sources to fund a project – adding complications.

  10. QUESTIONS?

More Related