1 / 29

Lisa Drummond University of Edinburgh

Lisa Drummond University of Edinburgh. Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile. Introduction. Gram positive spore- former obligately anaerobic first described in asymptomatic neonates increased use of antibiotics led to an increase in C. difficile disease. Introduction cont.

lorand
Download Presentation

Lisa Drummond University of Edinburgh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lisa DrummondUniversity of Edinburgh Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile

  2. Introduction • Gram positive spore- former • obligately anaerobic • first described in asymptomatic neonates • increased use of antibiotics led to an increase in C. difficile disease

  3. Introduction cont. • infection ranges from asymptomatic, mild diarrhoea, colitis to pseudomembranous colitis • risk factors - antibiotics, age, environment and virulence of infecting strain • third generation cephalosporins, clindamycin and amoxycillin associated with the greatest risk • disease occurs after depletion of patient’s normal protective flora

  4. Disease process ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY  ALTERATION OF COLONIC MICROFLORA  C.difficile EXPOSURE & COLONISATION  RELEASE OF TOXIN A & TOXIN B  COLONIC MUCOSAL INJURY AND INFLAMMATION Adapted from Kelly CP & LaMont JT (1998). Clostridium difficile infection. Annual Review of Medicine 49, 375-390.

  5. Incidence of C .difficile in the population Adapted from Kelly CP & LaMont JT (1998). Clostridium difficile infection. Annual Review of Medicine 49, 375-390.

  6. tcdD 552bp toxB 7098bp tcdE 501bp toxA 8133bp tcdC 695bp Pathogenicity Locus (PaLoc) • 19.6kb element replaced by 115bp in non-toxigenic strains • tcdD alternative sigma factor • tcdC putative negative regulator • toxins transcribed on entry to stationary phase

  7. PaLoc cont. toxin production affected by • glucose, • sub-inhibitory concs. of antibiotics, • amino acids, • temperature, • oxidative stress, • biotin insufficiency, • biocarbonate concentration...

  8. AIMS • to analyse MIC data, patient antibiotic regimes, S-types, resistance • to look at effects of sub-MICs on growth and toxin production • investigate toxin transcripts using RT-PCR • investigate total cell protein between controls and sub-MIC antibiotics using 2D gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF

  9. MICs • 186 strains and 6 antibiotics (NCCLS) • the two treatment agents - vancomycin and metronidazole • 4 precipitating agents - amoxycillin, clindamycin, cefoxitin and ceftriaxone • database utilised for any connections

  10. Clindamycin resistance • 12 isolates tested had clindamycin MIC of 128g/ml • all contained ermB gene • 2 different sizes noted • smaller band lack leader peptide (Farrow et al., 2002)

  11. Recurrences and reinfections • some patients produced up to 12 samples over the 18 months • allowed comparisons of their isolates over that time • some patients had changing S-types over this time • some patients also had different isolates in the same faecal sample

  12. MIC conclusions • no strains resistant to vancomycin or metronidazole • no significant difference of resistance profiles between S-types • no correlation between antibiotics given and resistance profiles • evidence of mixed infections or recurrences

  13. Sub-MIC antibiotics • antibiotics have previously been shown to affect toxin production in C.difficile • vast amounts of literature showing effects on other bacteria though there’s very little data for C. difficile

  14. Sub-MIC experimental set-up • used same 6 antibiotics as MIC work • used reference strain NCTC 11223, locally endemic strain 338a and sequenced strain 630 • 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8 sub-MIC concs. used • sampled 3X a day for 104 hours • OD600 measured each time and 1ml of supernate frozen for ELISA analysis

  15. Controls from sub-MIC experiments • each strain grown 6 times in total • growth varied little between strains • toxin elaborated at slightly different times in the growth curve • toxin production by 338a and 630 exceeds assay by ca. 48h

  16. Sub-MIC conclusions • there’s often a lag in the growth of the bacteria compared to the control • main effect on toxin is that it’s elaborated quicker under sub-MIC conditions • heterogeneity common between strains for toxin production and growth in response to antibiotics

  17. RT-PCR • wanted to look for toxin transcripts to see if they correlate to sub-MIC work • RNA concentrations low (ca. 5g/ml) • 16S transcripts easily seen but only with Sensiscript enzyme • low concentrations of RNA probably made toxin transcripts difficult to see

  18. Sensiscript • Sensiscript vastly improves ability to pick up 16S RNA • still no transcripts from toxins • decide to cut losses as time extremely short

  19. RT-PCR outcome • Was unsuccessful in seeing transcripts for toxins, tcdC, tcdD and groEL • use of Sensiscript led to clear signal from 16S RNA • if had more time would have tried another technique e.g. Trizol, Tri reagent etc.

  20. Proteomics • use 2D gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF analysis of proteins • protein profile still largely uncharacterised in C. difficile • wanted to compare control vs. sub-MIC • sample preparation reproducibility • new MASCOT database being set-up

  21. Control vs sub-MIC • gels very reproducible - good for future manipulations • no obvious difference between two sets of conditions (with and without ceftriaxone) • 40 spots from 6 gels were taken for MALDI-TOF • data still being analysed and new MASCOT database in the pipeline

  22. Typical 2D gel

  23. Conclusions - MICs • no strains resistant to either of the treatment agents • no significant difference of resistance profiles between S-types • no correlation between antibiotics given and resistance profiles • evidence of mixed infections or recurrences

  24. Conclusions - sub-MICs • sub-MIC antibiotics often cause a growth lag and shift forward the production of toxin • there is heterogeneity between strains and their response to sub-MIC antibiotics • the effect on toxin could not be seen mirrored in the toxin transcripts due to the sensitivity of the RT-PCR

  25. Conclusions - proteomics • reproducibility - good sample preparation • the combination of strain 630 and ceftriaxone produced a protein profile unchanged to that of the control • once new database available should get more high-scoring hits • next stage - other antibiotics and strains

  26. Acknowledgements Ian Poxton David Smith Bob Brown Jodie McCoubrey Microbial Pathogenicity Research Laboratory John Starr Becky Graham Functional Genomics Unit at MRI Pilar Alberdi MRC

More Related