1 / 20

Sustainable Urban Drainage

Sustainable Urban Drainage. Alan Jones (Alan.Jones@ed.ac.uk). Sustainable Drainage. A concept that focuses on the environment and people. Considers: Quantity of runoff Quality of runoff Amenity value of surface water Existing urban drainage systems are: Unsustainable in the long-term

loe
Download Presentation

Sustainable Urban Drainage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sustainable Urban Drainage Alan Jones (Alan.Jones@ed.ac.uk)

  2. Sustainable Drainage • A concept that focuses on the environment and people. • Considers: • Quantity of runoff • Quality of runoff • Amenity value of surface water • Existing urban drainage systems are: • Unsustainable in the long-term • Damaging to the environment

  3. Why are SUDS needed? Peak discharge becomes larger Floods occur quicker due to reduced infiltration Hydrograph: Discharge Time • SUDS: • Attenuate flow • Promote infiltration & groundwater recharge

  4. 11% of Scottish river length is classified as polluted due to contamination from urban drainage Why are SUDS needed? SUDSWP (2000) • SUDS aim to protect watercourses from point/diffuse pollution by acting as sinks for contaminants • Cost implications for maintaining long-term performance of SUDS

  5. Why are SUDS needed? Amenity • A ‘loaded term’ when used in relation to SUDS – environmental/community issues Covers: • Aesthetic & Ecological quality of the landscape • Land-use • Wildlife habitats • Land-values • Recreation opportunities • Educational opportunities • Water-resources Other factors: • Opportunity costs • Perceptions of risk • Construction impact

  6. SUDS ‘Triangle’

  7. Present Legal Status • WFD – Water Framework Directive (2000) • Prevent deterioration in water status • Restoration of surface waters to good ecological and chemical status by 2015 • Reduction of pollution from priority substances • Contributing to mitigating the effects of floods and droughts • Preventing/limiting pollution input into groundwater • CAR – The Water Environment (Controlled Activities) (Scotland) Regulations (2005) • Surface water-runoff in areas constructed, or construction sites operated, after 1st April 2006 must now be drained by a Sustainable Urban Drainage System • Exceptions – Single dwellings or if the discharge is to coastal water

  8. Conventional Drainage Precipitation: Rainfall/Snow Rapid conveyance of water & pollutants Local watercourse

  9. SUDS Drainage: The ‘treatment train’ approach • Connect SUDS together • Individual function of local SUDS techniques beneficial – but design should be led by a holistic vision & approach • Combined integrated function – mimics the waterflows in the natural hydrological cycle: • Surface Flow • Infiltration • Storage in water-bodies • Interflow • Evapotranspiration

  10. Treatment Train • Good Housekeeping: best practice to eliminate, or minimise, pollutants being generated and allowed into the environment. • Source Controls: methods of dealing with runoff at source, e.g. permeable paving, filter strips, or roadside filter trenches. • Site Controls: local controls that deal with generally smaller catchment areas, e.g. detention basins. • Regional Controls: larger components that might typically deal with larger catchments and upstream site controls, e.g. stormwater wetlands and retention ponds. (Heal, 2004)

  11. A variety of techniques Drainage conveyance Kerb design Roof drainage reuse Detention Basins Filter Drain Swales

  12. Retention Ponds Falkirk Stadium Retention Pond (Undeveloped catchment)

  13. Retention Ponds / Wetlands Lidl Distribution Centre, Livingston - Retention Pond (Loading bay, Carpark runoff)

  14. Tackling Contaminants • The flood-reducing benefits of SUDS are obvious... • Store water at various points in the catchment and allow water to be re-used, infiltrated, released slowly and/or evaporated. • These processes also allow the trapping of potential contaminants (e.g. metals, PAHs/Hydrocarbons) within the treatment train. • Contaminants are typically adsorbed (physico-chemically bonded) to sediment particles that are entrained in flow. • As water speed is slowed down using SUDS, particles (and therefore contaminants) settle out.

  15. Contaminant Sources: Vehicles • 15-fold increase in the number of car and taxi miles covered over the last 50 years! SUSTAINABLE (?) Campbell et al. (2004)

  16. Land-Use & Contamination (Beasley and Kneale, 2002)

  17. Design - Site Constraints • Physical site constraints can make construction difficult or impossible, and maintenance expensive if not addressed adequately. Factors to consider include: • topography - e.g. steep slopes • soils and geology - e.g. erosivity, porosity, depth to bedrock or instability • groundwater - e.g. geochemistry and water table depth • space - limited open space, proximity to underground services. (e.g. gas, power) • Social constraints include issues of health and safety, aesthetics and impacts on recreational facilities. Factors to consider include • odour problems • visual impacts • noise • physical injury - resulting from unauthorised access to structures; • contamination - infection, poisoning or injury caused by trapped pollutants or algal blooms • vermin - e.g. mosquitoes, rats.

  18. Design – Maintenance Issues • Not only can a poorly maintained SUDS technique function ineffectively, it can become a source of pollution or flood hazard itself. • When designing a SUDS measure, the following points should be considered: • ease of maintenance and operation - the selected treatment should be easy and safe to maintain and operate • extent of maintenance - ensure the maintenance requirements are within the operator's capability • access to the treatment site - consider the ease of site access, when reviewing the treatment's maintenance requirements • frequency of maintenance - ensure that resources are available to carry out maintenance at the required frequency • debris and pollutant clearing - during clearing, the treatment should not require direct human contact with debris and trapped pollutants (automated clearing options are preferred) • disposal - consider the disposal requirements of any waste from the treatment process.

  19. Case Study: J4M8 • SUDS development (c. 2000) • Previously agricultural land • Now a distribution hub based mid-way between Edinburgh and Glasgow

  20. J4M8 Oblique Aerial Photograph Reddinghill Bing (Landscaped, but still burning) Phase 1 Retention Pond Aldi Distribution Centre M8 Motorway Former Scottish Courage Distribution Centre

More Related