1 / 24

Measuring Quality Issues Associated with Internal Migration Estimates

Demographics Methods Centre and Centre for Demography. Measuring Quality Issues Associated with Internal Migration Estimates. Joanne Clements, Amir Islam, Ruth Fulton & Jane Naylor. Outline. Background Internal Migration Quality Issues Research methods Findings Issues arising Next Steps.

llarson
Download Presentation

Measuring Quality Issues Associated with Internal Migration Estimates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Demographics Methods Centre and Centre for Demography Measuring Quality Issues Associated with Internal Migration Estimates Joanne Clements, Amir Islam, Ruth Fulton & Jane Naylor

  2. Outline • Background • Internal Migration Quality Issues • Research methods • Findings • Issues arising • Next Steps

  3. Project • Improve understanding, • measurement and reporting of • the quality of population • estimates

  4. Context • Debate about amount of uncertainty in population estimates • Improving Migration and Population Statistics (IMPS) Project – Quality strand • ‘ONS should flag the level of reliability of individual local authority population estimates’ (UK Statistics Authority) • Leading new international research

  5. Key Methodology Points • Map out the procedures and data sources used to derive population estimates • Identify associated quality issues • Attempt to quantify uncertainty using statistical theory & empirical evidence instead of expert opinion • Combine individual measures of uncertainty by simulating potential errors in the data

  6. Key Methodology Points • Map out the procedures and data sources used to derive population estimates • Identify associated quality issues • Attempt to quantify uncertainty using statistical theory & empirical evidence instead of expert opinion • Combine individual measures of uncertainty by simulating potential errors in the data

  7. Key Methodology Points • Map out the procedures and data sources used to derive population estimates • Identify associated quality issues • Attempt to quantify uncertainty using statistical theory & empirical evidence instead of expert opinion • Combine individual measures of uncertainty by simulating potential errors in the data

  8. Key Methodology Points • Map out the procedures and data sources used to derive population estimates • Identify associated quality issues • Attempt to quantify uncertainty using statistical theory & empirical evidence instead of expert opinion • Combine individual measures of uncertainty by simulating potential errors in the data

  9. Progress • Initial work proved feasibility of simulation methodology • Focus now on sources of error with greatest impact; internal and international migration • Currently focussing on internal migration

  10. Internal Migration Methodology • Individual moves captured from GP re-registration data • Annual (end July) download of patient registers • Moves identified from changes with previous year’s download. • Local authority moves constrained to information provided by NHS Central Register

  11. Key Internal Migration Quality Issues Not registered at mid-year Time Lags Constraining GP register data to NHSCR data Source LA for out-flows to NI and Scotland Census and 2001 Patient Registers Double counting of School boarders

  12. Research Methods • A review of relevant literature. • Local authority level data analysis • Review any internal quality assurance. • Sensitivity analysis

  13. Re-registration Time Lag Research • Comparison of mid-2001 internal migration estimates with 2001 Census migration estimates • Sex ratios • Propensity to migrate • Comparison with other data sources • Investigating ‘bumps’ in population age profiles that sustain over time

  14. Birmingham Population Age Profile

  15. Provisional Time Lag Findings:Sex Ratios • Evidence of late-registration of young male migrants • Geographic variation in sex ratio differences and therefore time lags

  16. Provisional Time Lag Findings:Propensity to Migrate • GP List inflation invalidates analysis to compare Census and internal migration propensities • Instead, comparing migrant counts for similar populations to identify possible time lags • Census doesn’t always produce higher LA internal migration estimates

  17. Provisional Time Lag Findings:Other Data Sources • Limited other data sources with which to compare with – No major differences with comparator data sources • Evidence from survey data of significant late registration (Median 4 months)

  18. Provisional Time Lag Findings:Age Profiles • Some LAs do have age profile bumps that sustain (particularly young adults ages) • Patterns vary again geographically • Possibly due to: • Imbalance between in and out migrants in LAs with higher education institutions (Males especially) • Increases in International immigrants (young males again)

  19. Provisional Time Lag Findings:Summary • Evidence of Age-Sex Specific Time lags in re-registration. • Evidence that these vary geographically. • Unclear how much year on year time lags cancel each other out. • Next Step is to produce an potential error distribution

  20. School Boarder Research • LAs with largest school boarder populations chosen to identify possible double counting • Comparing age profile changes in school boarders with LA internal migration estimates

  21. Provisional School Boarder Findings • Similar patterns between school boarder arrivals and internal in-migration • Therefore, strong evidence of double counting • Difficult to estimate accurately due to data issues • Limited impact, for most LAs, on all age internal migration estimates

  22. Challenge: Deriving Error Distributions For Each Quality Issue • Lack of suitable data • Conflicting evidence • Somewhat subjective choice of error bounds • Bias towards larger errors? • Sensitivity Testing • Constraining • Correlation • User Feedback

  23. Challenge: Interpretation of Findings • In reality, there is uncertainty in these measures of uncertainty, as… • Only as good as the error assumptions made for each issue • Therefore exact findings are misleading • Present approximate indicators

  24. Reporting and Future Work • Short update on progress – August 2009 • Detailed papers on internal migration findings - November 2009 - 2010 • Potential further work: • - international migration • - quantifying impact of methodological changes on quality of estimates

More Related