1 / 17

Ranking in social networks

Ranking in social networks. Miha Gr č ar Course in Knowledge Management Lecturer: prof. dr. Nada Lavrac Ljubljana, January 200 7. Outline of the presentation. I. Prestige Structural prestige, social prestige, correlation Ways of calculating structural prestige II. Ranking Triad census

linus
Download Presentation

Ranking in social networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ranking in social networks Miha Grčar Course in Knowledge Management Lecturer: prof. dr. Nada Lavrac Ljubljana, January 2007

  2. Outline of the presentation • I. Prestige • Structural prestige, social prestige, correlation • Ways of calculating structural prestige • II. Ranking • Triad census • Acyclic decomposition • Symmetric-acyclic decomposition Miha Grčar

  3. I. Prestige • Prestigious people • People who receive many positive in-links • Structural prestige measures • Popularity or in-degree • (Restricted) input domain • Proximity prestige • Structural prestige≠ social prestige (social status) • Correlation between structural and social prestige • Pearson’s correlation coefficient • Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient Miha Grčar

  4. Popularity or in-degree 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 0 Miha Grčar

  5. Input domain • Input domain size • How many nodes are path-connected to a particular node? • Overall structure of the network is taken into account • Problematic in a well-connected network 0 3 2 0 7 0 1 0 Miha Grčar

  6. Restricted input domain • Resolves the input-domain issue in a well-connected network • Issue: the choice of the maximum distance is quite arbitrary 0 3 2 0 5 0 1 0 Maximum distance = 2 Miha Grčar

  7. Proximity prestige • Eliminates the maximum-distance parameter • Closer neighbors are weighted higher 0 0.23 0.25 0 0.47 0 0.13 0 Input domain size / Number of nodes 7 / 8 Proximity prestige = = 0.47 Average path-distance to the node (3+3+2+2 (3+3 (3+3+2+2+1+1+1) / 7 (3+3+2+2+1+1+1 Miha Grčar

  8. II. Ranking • We discuss techniques to extract discrete ranks from social relations • Triad analysis helps us determine if our network is biased towards… • Unrelated clusters (cluster = clique) • Ranked clusters • Hierarchical clusters • Recipes for determining the hierarchy • Acyclic decomposition • Symmetric-acyclic decomposition Miha Grčar

  9. Triad analysis • Triads • Atomic network structures (local) • 16 different types • M-A-N naming convention • Mutual positive • Asymmetric • Null Miha Grčar

  10. All 16 types of triads Miha Grčar

  11. Triad census • 6 balance-theoretic models • Balance • Clusterability • Ranked clusters • Transitivity • Hierarchical clusters • (Theoretic model) • Triad census: triads found in the network, arranged by the balance-theoretic model to which they belong Restricted to Unrelated clusters Ranked clusters Less and less restricted Hierarchical clusters Unrestricted Miha Grčar

  12. Acyclic decomposition • Cyclic networks (strong components) are clusters of equals • Acyclic networks perfectly reflect hierarchy • Recipe • Partition the network into strong components (i.e. clusters of equals) • Create a new network in which each node represents one cluster • Compute the maximum depth of each node to determine the hierarchy Miha Grčar

  13. Acyclic decompositionAn example Miha Grčar

  14. Acyclic decompositionAn example (1) (0) (2) The maximum depth of a node determines its position in the hierarchy Miha Grčar

  15. Symmetric-acyclic decomposition • Strong components are not strict enough to detect clusters in the triad-census sense • Symmetric-acyclic decomposition extracts clusters of vertices that are connected both ways • After the clusters are identified, we can follow the same steps as in acyclic decomposition to determine the hierarchy Miha Grčar

  16. Symmetric-acyclic decomp.An example Miha Grčar

  17. Reference • Batagelj V., Mrvar A., de Nooy W. (2004): Exploratory Network Analysis withPajek. Cambridge University Press • Some figures used in the presentation are taken from this book Miha Grčar

More Related