Qgpc finance
Download
1 / 14

QGPC Finance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 87 Views
  • Uploaded on

QGPC Finance. A 800 million US$ export receivable-backed note issue for the Qatar General Petroleum Corp., 2000.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' QGPC Finance' - linh


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Qgpc finance

QGPC Finance

A 800 million US$ export receivable-backed note issue for the Qatar General Petroleum Corp., 2000

Summary: the assignment of export receivables made it possible for QGPC to obtain, for the issue, a rating one notch higher than its own rating (BBB+ rather than BBB). This rating is constrained because of exposure to oil price volatility and the risk of competition by new NGL facilities, a lack of long-term forward contracts, an optimistic schedule for the construction of a plant which will generate much of the expected revenue (if ready in time), and some legal risks (including with respect to untested Qatari law on insolvency and bankruptcy - QGPC falls under local law and with respect to New York State Law, if in the case of a general default, Qatar has to enter into a Paris Club restructuring and the transaction is not seen as a sale and purchase, but as a loan).


Overview of the structure

Qatar state oil company QGPC raised 1.2 billion US$, including 800 million US$ from institutional investors to fund new Natural Gas Liquids processing facilities and to cover some of its working capital needs.

The 800 million US$ capital markets issue was structured through a Special Purpose Vehicle set up in the Cayman Islands. QGPC sold all of its current and future receivables from all of its NGL processing facilities: two facilities which already exist, and one which is to be constructed with the funds raised. In case this does not generate sufficient funds, QGPC has the obligation to immediately make up for any shortfalls.


Overview of the structure

Banks

400 million US$ syndicated bank loan

100% government-owned

Assignment of export receivables

Qatar General Petroleum Corp. (QGPC)

QGPC Finance (Cayman) Ltd.

800 million US$

BBB

Issuance of 10-year notes

667 million US$

533 million US$

800 million US$

BBB+

Working capital expenditures

NGL-4

project

Institutional investors

Upgrade of recycling & gas plants

New 100 km pipeline

New fractionation plant


NGL helps to valorize crude oil and LNG production, and provides inputs to industry (including the local power and water desalination plants).

The production picture

Crude oil

Liquefied Natural

Natural Gas

Gas Liquids

(LNG) (NGL)

QGPC 1999 operating revenues:

crude oil 58%

LNG 14%

NGL 11%

Refined products 7%

Petrochemicals 5%

Fertilizers 3%

Hydrocarbons account for 60-70% of Qatar budget revenues, and 75-80% of exports.

Petrochemical industry

Fertilizer industry

Domestic natural gas distribution

Associated & NGL recovery NGL fractionation ethane, propane domestic use

Non-associated gas plant plant butane, condensate export


Mitigating the risks provides inputs to industry (including the local power and water desalination plants).

  • The receivables from the existing NGL plants were not sufficient to support a rating at the BBB+ level. Thus, the rating depends partly on the performance risks of QGPC, that is, the risk that the planned new NGL plant will not be operational in time. This risk was mitigated by due diligence and through the manner in which the pre-construction and construction phase were handled (including constructor warranties and penalties).

  • Apart from that, it was necessary to evaluate the risk that even if the new plant would become operational in time, earnings would fall short of expectations. For this, the risk of “distress cargoes” (not being able to sell products) was evaluated and a “distress price scenario” (oil prices at US$ 10 for a multi-year period) calculated.

  • Then, as the transaction was mainly structured around the receivables (rather than on the basis of a title on producing assets) it was necessary first:

  • to evaluate what risk there was of a fund diversion or of the investors losing their first title, and to ensure that such risks were kept to the minimum; and second

  • to ensure that even when prices are low for a prolonged period, there are enough funds to ensure debt service.


A first look at the risks provides inputs to industry (including the local power and water desalination plants).

  • Pre-construction

  • Proven technology already used in other plants in Qatar.

  • Engineering & design done by experienced contractor.

  • Siting plans, permits etc.

  • Environmental Impact Assessment needed.

  • Independent consultant thinks this will not be a problem.

  • Right of way of new pipeline: no problem, as it will follow route of existing pipeline.

  • Construction

  • Date-certain, lump-sum, turnkey engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contract with experienced international consortium. Phillips Petroleum will manage the construction process on behalf of QGPC.

  • Operation

  • QGPC will be the operator, and has good and consistent 20-year history in operating NGL facilities.

NGL-4 plant

Lenders do not have any lien, pledge or mortgage on the NGL-4 projects or other properties of QGPC: they rely on the receivables, and for backstopping, full recourse to QGPC.


A closer look at the risks during the construction phase provides inputs to industry (including the local power and water desalination plants).

  • The EPC contract as well as the contract with the project manager (Phillips Petroleum) contain penalty clauses. Insurance requirements are also set.

  • EPC contract

  • 30% of the payments are milestone payments

  • Liquidated damages of one-ninth of 1% of the lump sum price for every calendar day the the project runs over the scheduled handover date, with a maximum of 10%.

  • Liquidated damages of 350,000 to 500,000 Qatar riyal (a person, depending on seniority) for removal of key personnel without QGPC’s approval.

  • Third-party liability, worker’s compensation and all-risk hull and machinery insurance.

  • Construction management contract

  • Delay damages up to 10 million US$.

  • QGPC

  • QGPC carries a project management insurance programme (construction all- risk).


Supply and market risks provides inputs to industry (including the local power and water desalination plants).

Will gas supply be sufficient?

Qatar has the world’s third largest natural gas reserves. An independent reserves consultant has concluded that these are more than sufficient.

Market risk

NGL products can always be sold easily (there are liquid spot markets), but with a price risk. To deal with this risk, a financial forecast has been made by an independent market consultant. Noteholders will be protected even if prices are low for a long time, while QGPC has an incentive to continue producing because variable costs are only some 10% of 1999 prices.


The revenue stream provides inputs to industry (including the local power and water desalination plants).

  • Under a “Receivables Purchase Agreement” (RPA), QGPC sold to QGPC Finance (Caymans) Ltd. All its existing and future receivables arising from GGPC’s sale of ethane, propane, butane and NGL condensate produced at the Mesaieed NGL complex.

  • If insufficient receivables are generated, noteholders have full recourse to QGPC.

  • The receivables are sold as follows:

  • long-term Feedstock Agreement with Q-Chem (Qatar,

  • to become operational mid-2002) for ethane sales

  • long-term Butane and Gas Feedstock Sales and Purchase

  • Agreement with QAFAC (Qatar), for butane sales

  • Free market sales on a short- to medium-term contract basis.

25% of total expected revenue until 2010


The revenue stream provides inputs to industry (including the local power and water desalination plants).

  • long-term Feedstock Agreement with Q-Chem (51% GGPC, 49% Phillips Petroleum Co, USA, A-).

  • A 25-year arrangement starting in 2002, with pre-set prices which escalate at a fixed rate. In addition, Q-Chem will pay a bonus for each year that the annual FOB price for polyethylene sold by Q-Chem exceeds a certain price per tonne. QGPC must deliver enough ethane gas to enable Q-Chem to produce 500,000 tonnes per year of ethylene.

  • long-term Butane and Gas Feedstock Sales and Purchase Agreement with QAFAC (50% QGPC, 50% other investors).

  • A 1997-2024 arrangement for 495,333 tonnes of butane a year. Sales price is the monthly price per tonne FOB declared by Saudi Arabia for like butane, as quoted by Platt’s LP GasWire. Payment of butane prices in excess of US$ 120 a tonne could have been deferred if, before early 2000, QAFAC would have had revenue problems.

  • Free market sales

  • QGPC has a good market reputation, and is considered a reliable supplier.


A closer look at the transaction structure provides inputs to industry (including the local power and water desalination plants).

EPC contractor

Payments on behalf of QGPC

Receivables purchase agreement

5% charitable trust, 95% QGCP

Qatar General Petroleum Corp. (QGPC)

SPV: QGPC Finance (Cayman) Ltd.

266 million US$ minus debt service reserves

800 million US$

Managed by collateral agent

Product sales agreement, payment instructions

Surplus funds

10-year notes

Collection account

Debt Service Reserve Account

Institutional investors

QGPC customers

Sales proceeds

Debt service


A closer look at the transaction structure: the receivables assignment

To perfect the SPV’s ownership interest and lien in the receivables under New York and Qatari law:

1. QNPC has to obtain from all customers under sales contracts of over one year consents to the sale of the receivables and the lien thereon, and their consent to pay to the offshore collection account.

2. For short-term and spot sales, QGPC can simply send notices.

BUT: even with this, the full recourse to QGPC may mean that under New York State Law, there was no “true sale” of receivables. In case of insolvency, priority rights may therefore be difficult to enforce.

Qatar General Petroleum Corp. (QGPC)

Product sales agreement, payment instructions

QGPC customers


A closer look at the transaction structure: the collection account

EPC contractor

Payments on behalf of QGPC

533 million US$ is reserved to make the payments for the construction of the NGL plant

Qatar General Petroleum Corp. (QGPC)

SPV: QGPC Finance (Cayman) Ltd.

Managed by collateral agent

Surplus funds

Collection account

Debt Service Reserve Account

Institutional investors

Priority for payments from collection account:

1. Pay SPV taxes and structure expenses

2. Fund debt service payments

3. Make debt service reserves meet targets

4. Any remaining funds can be distributed to QGPC

Debt service

Six months of interest funded up-front

Reserves to increase to 6 months of principal

In case of revenue shortfalls, automatic increase


Conclusion account

This transaction has hybrid features, partly resembling traditional receivables financing, partly project financing.

It is different from project financing in that there is no “step-in” right to operate the NGL facilities that are to generate the receivables in case of a default; instead, there is only a general recourse to QGPC (a recourse that may be difficult to enforce under Qatari law). Also, only part of the funds generated are used to construct a new facility.

It is different from a pure receivables financing in that measures are taken to ensure that the new plant is indeed constructed in time - the financing is partly based on expected receivables from a new facility, rather than on an existing revenue stream.

The structurers of the transaction evidently had difficulty eliminating legal risk. This may well have been due to the fact that QGPC did not want to give “step-in” rights, while for the investors, in the absence of such step-in rights they needed some other form of recourse. The resulting full recourse to QGPC meant that legally, the transaction may well be classified as a loan rather than as a receivables purchase.


ad