1 / 21

cero.nu

www.cero.nu. Robèrt, M. (2009). International Journal of Sustainable Transportation Vol. 3, No. 1. What is CERO?. Developed for an energy sector with large complexity: travel behaviour needs to be modelled explicitly need for tailor-made cost-benefit assessments

lindafoster
Download Presentation

cero.nu

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. www.cero.nu Robèrt, M. (2009). International Journal of Sustainable Transportation Vol. 3, No. 1

  2. What is CERO? Developed for an energy sector with large complexity: travel behaviour needs to be modelled explicitly need for tailor-made cost-benefit assessments a tool for benchmarking to spread good examples Engages a broad range of experts and researchers: Statisticians Economists Behaviourists Environmental consultants Technical implementers Change managers Developed in a doctoral thesis at KTH:”Mobility Management and Climate Change Policies”

  3. Developed with empirical support from large organizations

  4. Macro economic effects from 10% trafic reductions in Stockholm county(Robèrt och Jonsson, 2006) -EUR 75 000 000 accident costs -EUR 36 000 000 emission costs -EUR 57 000 000 in vehicle time costs ( = EUR 170 000 000/year)

  5. Why setting climate targets for employee travel?

  6. Employee travel costs and emissions at the County Council of Kalmar Travel costs and emissions walk hand i hand - Short-term cost cut potential: 100 000-500 000 Euro/1000 employees and year

  7. - “Indirect values” of showing best practice IT-sector, transport sector, energy sector, public authorities…

  8. CERO is based on backcasting Mapping Travel policies Target

  9. Mapping- Employee commute trips are in general far most dominant

  10. Benchmarking

  11. A trigger for internal processing and stakeholder dialogues (benchmarking positions are fictitious)

  12. Mapping of individual preferences Car-sharing Taxi

  13. Problem with climate targets: % - reductions are appropriate for emission audits but hard to follow-up in policy terms %CO2

  14. Transformation of the backcasting target %CO2

  15. Modules of tailor made 1% CO2-reductions(commute trips) • 31 car commuters switch to public transport • Train tickets to 4 commuters with longest commute distance • Encourage 38 car commuters to renewable fuel cars • Allow telecommuting at least once a month • Offer eco-driving to at least ¼ of staff • Encourage at least 191 car commuters with commute distance 0,5-6km to cycle

  16. Modules of tailor made 1% CO2-reductions(business trips) • Replace 7% of business trips by car to public transport Annual cost reduction 1,1 Mkr • Replace 4% of business trips by car to virtual meetings Annual cost reduction 2,3 Mkr • Replace all business trips with private car to car sharing Costs unchanged • Replace 2% of aviation trips abroad to virtual meetings Annual cost reduction 540.000 kr • Replace 3% av domestic aviation to train Annual cost reduction215.000 kr

  17. An example of a policy package targeting 40% CO2-reductions…

  18. Labour productivity effects

  19. The CERO-process in practiceThree backcasting steps CO2 1. Principal level – Reach consensus on the target description Economy Employee acceptance 2. Scenario level – Select an optimized travel scenario from the smorgasbord 3. Plan of action level – Selection of measures that correspond to the optimized travel scenario

  20. Thank you!markus@infra.kth.se

More Related