1 / 12

Continuity of Care Task Force

Continuity of Care Task Force. February 5, 2010. BACKGROUND. The Texas State Psychiatric Hospital system is nearing capacity While total admissions and civil commitments have decreased, the number of forensic commitments has increased

lillith-walker
Download Presentation

Continuity of Care Task Force

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Continuity of Care Task Force February 5, 2010

  2. BACKGROUND • The Texas State Psychiatric Hospital system is nearing capacity • While total admissions and civil commitments have decreased, the number of forensic commitments has increased • Forensic commitments generally involve longer lengths of stay • The increased number of forensic commitments and longer term patients has overcome the impact of decreased admissions

  3. TASK FORCE GOALS • Examine the overall continuum of care for individuals with severe mental illness who move through multiple systems • Make and prioritize recommendations to improve efficiencies, access and quality • Examine barriers to discharge for individuals in State Hospitals with extended lengths of stay • Make and prioritize recommendations to resolve barriers to discharge

  4. TIMELINE • Four Task Force Meetings • February 5, 2010 • February 19, 2010 • March 26, 2010 • April 16, 2010 • Four Public Forums • March 3, 2010, Czech Heritage Hall, LaGrange, TX • Individual Interviews • Meetings with Key Professional Groups • Final Report—September 30, 2010

  5. SYSTEM MAPPING • State Hospital capacity issues are multi-factorial • How do individuals move through systems? • What are the similarities and differences of this movement across the state? • What are some potential points of intervention? • What additional data do we need?

  6. POINTS OF POTENTIAL INTERVENTION • Community Prevention • Law Enforcement • Jails • Courts • Re-Entry/Re-Integration

  7. LAW ENFORCEMENT • Community Based Alternatives to Arrest/Incarceration • Wide utilization of MCOT? • Specialized Law Enforcement Teams/Models • Implemented in most urban areas? • Rural alternatives? • Law Enforcement Training • Discretion about Charges • Data Needs?

  8. JAIL BASED STRATEGIES • Screening/Assessment • Jail Based Treatment • Formularies • Forced Medications • Utilization of 16.22/17.032 Release on Personal Bond • Data Needs?

  9. COURT BASED STRATEGIES • Identification of behavioral health issues • Court coordinators • Raising competency • Specialized dockets/courts/attorneys • Restoration • Outpatient restoration of competency • Not likely to regain • Data needs?

  10. RE-ENTRY/RE-INTEGRATION • Discharge Planning • Jails • Prisons • Hospitals • Appointments • Medications • Housing

  11. COMMUNITY PREVENTION • Expansion of community based (not just crisis) care • Target population • Guardianship • Integrated Behavioral Health • ACT/FACT/FICM • Data Needs?

  12. NEXT STEPS • System Mapping Follow Up • Examination of Extended Stay Population • Other Stakeholders? • Future Planning

More Related