Large and complex proposals making a commitment to achieve the rewards
Download
1 / 55

Large and Complex Proposals: Making a Commitment to Achieve the Rewards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 116 Views
  • Uploaded on

Large and Complex Proposals: Making a Commitment to Achieve the Rewards. Diane M. Meyer, Iowa State University Jerry Weinberg, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville Nicole Nichols, Washington University – St. Louis. Intro. Three Phases of Proposal Development

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Large and Complex Proposals: Making a Commitment to Achieve the Rewards' - liliha


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Large and complex proposals making a commitment to achieve the rewards

Large and Complex Proposals: Making a Commitment to Achieve the Rewards

Diane M. Meyer, Iowa State University

Jerry Weinberg, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville

Nicole Nichols, Washington University – St. Louis


Intro

Intro the Rewards

Three Phases of Proposal Development

Who are the Players in Proposal Development?

Faculty Perspective

Pre-Award Specialist (DRA) Role

NIH-specific Topics


Three phases of proposal development

Three Phases of Proposal the RewardsDevelopment

Phase 1: Framing

Phase 2: Collaboration

Phase 3: Refinement

“Averting the Big Bang”, K. Dressler, L. Mulfinger, & N. Page; NCURA Magazine, March/April 2013


Who are the players in proposal development

Who are the Players in the RewardsProposal Development?

Principal Investigator (PI) needs to be supportive of the timeline. Ultimately controls the process, but relies on key players to complete tasks and stay on the timeline.

Advocate (AV) needs to be identified by University and PI, perhaps an institutional administrator (i.e. Research Dean, Institute Director, Department Head)

University

“Averting the Big Bang”, K. Dressler, L. Mulfinger, & N. Page; NCURA Magazine, March/April 2013


Who are the players in proposal development1

Who are the Players in the RewardsProposal Development?

Development Specialist (DV) is typically a Masters or PhD-level professional who serve as catalysts in the proposal process and participates in writing/editing

Pre-Award Specialist (DRA) assists w/compliance, budget and administrative functions. May have university authority for proposal submission.

“Averting the Big Bang”, K. Dressler, L. Mulfinger, & N. Page; NCURA Magazine, March/April 2013


Faculty Perspective: OMG! the Rewards

  • The hyper-complexity of large proposals is daunting, overwhelming, discouraging

    • Particularly for faculty have never been a part of a large grant

  • Where do I start?

    • Particularly if the proposal is being “encouraged” by the Dean

    • How do I find the right collaborators?

    • Getting the right collaborators to “buy-in” just to the idea of submitting a proposal?

      • They will be daunted, overwhelmed, and discouraged too.


  • Faculty Perspective: OMG! the Rewards

    • How to handle multiple units, multiple institutions

      • Overcoming differing policies, needing myriad approvals, agreements to commitments of effort and resources

    • How can I figure out this incredibly complex budget?

      • Sub-awards, salaries, participant costs, external evaluators

    • The proposal is asking for all sorts of institutional or regional data!

      • where in the world does that come from?



    Faculty Perspective: OMG! the Rewards

    • How do I manage multiple authors?

      • How do I get it to read like one proposal and not a patch work of thoughts and ideas

    • How does this all happen in the short time period between now and the submission deadline?


    • Helpful Tips the Rewards

      • Identify potential collaborators

        • Many ways to do this

          • I typically network through the Associate Deans

      • Have “kick-off” meeting

        • I, as the APR, typically contact the individuals first to lend to the importance of the meeting

        • I have my SPO staff handle the logistics of arranging the meeting

      • Be sure there is a “can-do” person at the meeting

        • Preferably a faculty member who has been through a large grant before.

          • Typically it is me (APR), the Associate Dean for Research, or a research director

      • Have a pre-award specialist who will be assigned to help and follow the progress.


    • Helpful Tips the Rewards

      • The kick-off meeting

        • Brainstorm initial ideas

        • Re-assure faculty that there are solutions to hurdles even though they might not be readily apparent

        • Emphasize the importance of the grant to the institution

        • Re-assure faculty that your institution can put in a competitive grant

          • Identify potential multi-institutional partners if necessary

        • Important things to conclude at the meeting

          • Identify the faculty member who is taking the lead

          • Offer help to answer difficult questions or make new contacts

          • Identify what information to gather or ideas to discuss with others by next meeting

          • Determine a high-level time-line


    • Helpful-tips the Rewards

      • Have pre-award specialist follow-up

        • Attend meetings when possible

      • Pre-award specialist provides project management principles

        • Develop a detailed time line of proposal development

        • Identify who is responsible for specific areas

        • Set a schedule of meetings

        • Support necessary document sharing



    • Pre-Award Specialist (DRA) Role – Phase 1 the Rewards

      • Read the Guidelines

        • Deadlines

        • Budget – what’s allowable, cap, IDC limits, what’s required

        • Type of award – Contract, Grant, Cooperative Agreement, other

      • Develop a Proposal Outline

      • Develop a Timeline

        • Writing assignments

        • Internal deadlines

        • Meetings – this may include face-to-face as well as virtual meetings (conference calls, web conferencing)


    • Pre-Award Specialist (DRA) Role – Phase 1 the Rewards

      • Identify resources for complex administrative issues

        • Compliance

        • Confidentiality/Non-Disclosure Agreements

        • Intellectual Property

        • Financial/Other Conflict of Interest

        • Space

        • Administrative support

        • Broader Impacts

        • Data management


    • Pre-Award Specialist (DRA) Role – Phase 1 the Rewards

      • Download or Create Forms & Templates from sponsor or to meet institutional requirements

      • Develop the Draft Budget,

        • Begin discussions with Advocate concerning Cost Share requirements

        • Identify external partners (PI’s and DRA’s)

      • Notify Sponsored Research Office


    • Pre-Award Specialist (DRA) Role – Phase 2 the Rewards

      • Review the Guidelines

      • Refine the Budget, including Cost Share if required

      • Request, Review, and Assemble

        • Biosketches

        • Current & Pending Support

        • Conflict of Interest

      • Letters of Support, Commitment (internal and external)



    • Pre-Award Specialist (DRA) Role – Phase 3 the Rewards

      • Review the Guidelines

      • Finalize the Budget, justification, cost share, and third party participation

      • Assure that the University approval process is completed prior to the deadline

      • Assist with assembly and submission of proposal, including uploading of files, email, or shipping

      • Requirements immediately after submission


    “procrastination the Rewardsby team members early in the process leads to long work days in the last week and increases the likelihood of errors and missed opportunities in the application.”

    Dressler, Mulfinger, & Page


    NIH Large Complex submissions the Rewards

    • Multi-project applications are the last remaining paper submissions.

      • They are often large projects or centers

        • Contain an umbrella applications describing the overall effort

        • Contain the equivalent of a full application for each subproject

      • They can vary in size (2-200+ components)

      • They an have a large number of key personnel


    CURRENT SUBMISSION PROCESS the Rewards

    1 – Application is developed electronically

    2 – Printed

    3 – Mailed to NIH

    4 – Data is manually inputted to set record in eRA Commons

    5 – Paper application gets scanned and put in grant folder


    NIH the Rewards

    • Several types of Large Complex Grants

      • P01 – Research Program Project Grants

      • P20 – Exploratory Grants

      • P50 – Specialized Center Grants

      • R24 – Resource-Related Research Projects

      • U24 – Resource-Related Cooperative Agreements

      • U19 – Research Program Cooperative Agreements


    More Large Complex NIH grants the Rewards

    • G12 – Research Centers in Minority institutions Award

    • P30 – Center Core Grants

    • P40 – Animal Model, and Animal and Biological Material Resource Grants

    • P41 – Biotechnology Resource Grants

    • P42 – Hazardous Substances Basic Research Grants

    • P51 – Primate Research Center Grants

    • P60 – Comprehensive Center

    • R28 – Resource Related Research Projects


    And yet more NIH Large Complex Grants the Rewards

    • U10 – Cooperative Clinical Research

    • U41 – Biotechnology Resource Cooperative Agreements

    • U42 – Animal Model and Animal and Biological Materials Cooperative Agreements

    • U45 – Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training Cooperative Agreements

    • U56 – Exploratory Grants Cooperative Agreements

    • UC7 – National Biocontainment Laboratory Operation Cooperative Agreement

    • UM1 – Research Project with Complex Structure Cooperative Agreement

    • U54 – Specialized Center Cooperative Agreements


    List of all activity codes for NIH grants with descriptions: the Rewards

    • http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/ac_search_results.htm


    A the Rewards

    S

    T

    S

    S

    I

    Application Submission System &

    Interface for Submission Tracking


    NIH the Rewards

    • ASSIST – new electronic submission program for Multi-project grant submissions

      • Application Submission System and Interface for Submission Tracking

      • The first FOA to use ASSIST has been announced (P42)

      • Some multi-projects will use ASSIST as of Sept 2013 (P01, P20, P50, R24, U24, U19)

      • Remaining multi-project submissions will have to use ASSIST as of Jan 2014 (except U54 & UM1 – May 2014)


    • Please note – the structure of NIH’s multi-project applications cannot be accommodated by the Grants.gov downloadable forms.

    • The ASSIST system is a separate web-based submission system that works in conjunction with Grants.gov

      NIH Notice regarding ASSIST:

      http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-12-161.html


    • Once an activity code transitions to ASSIST, ALL applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.

      • Reminder – September 25, 2013 is go date for P01, P20, P50, R24, U24, U19

      • If you have one of these projects due on or after September 25th, you should begin using ASSIST NOW


    Electronic Submission of Project Applications Using ASSIST applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.

    All ASSIST users must have eRA Commons credentials with one of the following roles:

    • Signing Official (SO)

    • Administrative Official (AO)

    • Principal Investigator (PI)

    • Assistant (ASST)

    • Account Administrator (AA)


    Enter application data for all components applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.

    Submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH

    Find Opportunity

    Initiate application and create the application shell

    Build Team

    Initiate

    Enter Data

    Submit

    Track

    Finalize

    Plan

    Find

    Get familiar

    with the process and create an application plan

    Finalize components and prepare your application for submission

    Define your team and provide application access

    Track status and view final application image


    Grants.gov Find applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.

    • Find Multi-Project FOA’s in

    NIH Guide for Grants & Contracts


    NIH Guide for Grants & Contracts applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.

    • The FOA will link you to the ASSIST system

    Grants.gov ‘Apply’


    Section IV. Application and Submission Information applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.of NIH FOAs includes important guidance for preparing your application in ASSIST.

    The SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provides general instructions for completing application forms.


    Agency-specific instructions are marked with the HHS logo. applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.

    Just a reminder…

    When instructions in the Application Guide conflict with instructions in the FOA, the FOA wins.


    All electronic multi-project applications will include: applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.

    • A single Overall component

      • Provides overview of entire application

    • A number of additional components

      • Component types allowed will vary by opportunity

      • Announcements will clearly indicate the types of components expected in a responsive application

    • Automatically prepared data summaries

      • Compiled from information included in components

      • Helps reviewers and staff work with the applications


    How will your application image will be assembled by NIH? applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.

    • The Overall component is presented first

      • Including system-generated data summaries

    • Additional component types are presented in alphabetical order (e.g., Cores before Projects)

      • Components of the same type are grouped together and presented in the order created in ASSIST

      • Components are identified by type and sequential number (e.g., Core-001, Core-002)


    Sample excerpt from FOA (section IV) applications (new, resubmission, renewal and revision) to an FOA for that code MUST be submitted electronically.



    ASSIST automatically provides application access to some individuals based on their Commons roles or role on the application

    • All SOs and AOs at the applicant institution have edit access for the entire application

    • All PD/PIs listed on the Overall application have edit access for the entire application

    • The Project Leads have edit access for their components

    • The person that initiates the application has edit access for the entire application


    SOs at the applicant institution can individuals based on their Commons roles or role on the application

    • Manage application access for other users

    • Manage application status all the way to Ready for Submission status

    • Access the Submit action


    • Enter the data individuals based on their Commons roles or role on the application

      • ASSIST screen tips

        • Found at the top of many data entry screens

      • Annotated form sets

        • http://grants.nih.gov/grants/ElectronicReceipt/communication.htm#forms

      • Ten Checks to Help Avoid Common Errors

        • http://grants.nih.gov/grants/ElectronicReceipt/avoiding_errors.htm#10checks


    As component data is entered several actions are available: individuals based on their Commons roles or role on the application

    • Validate Component

    • Preview Current Component

    • Update Component Status

      • Work In Progress – only status that allows editing

      • Complete – component data entry is complete

      • Final – component has been reviewed by applicant organization and incorporated into the application


    Errors stop application processing and must be corrected before the deadline

    Warnings do not stop application submission and are corrected at the discretion of the applicant before the deadline

    Check out this resource: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/ElectronicReceipt/avoiding_errors.htm


    • As components are marked ‘Complete’, the applicant organization can preview them and incorporate those that are ready into the final application by updating the component status to ‘Final’.

    • All components must be marked ‘Final’ before an application can be prepared for submission.


    Application Status Flow organization can preview them and incorporate those that are ready into the final application by updating the component status to ‘Final’.

    • Work In Progress – Allows editing

    • All Components Final – Can only be updated once each component status is Final; must Validate Application to move to next status

    • All Components Validated – Automatically set once Application Validation is error-free

    • Ready for Submission – Should be set after all internal reviews have taken place

    • Submitted – Automatically set after submitting to Grants.gov


    Error-free submission must be made by 5:00 p.m. local time (of submitting organization) on due date

    • It takes time to prepare your application for submission

    • Submit early (days, not minutes) to have time to address any unforeseen issues and to viewyour application image in Commons


    Only a Signing Official (of submitting organization) on due date (SO) for the Lead Organization who is an Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) can submit an application.

    Applications are submitted from ASSIST to Grants.gov.


    Check out this resource: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/electronicreceipt/files/ASSIST_eNotifications.pdf


    Applicants have two (2) business days to view the assembled application image in Commons before it automatically moves forward to NIH staff for further processing

    SO can Reject application in Commons within viewing window and submit a Changed/Corrected application prior to the due date

    If you can’t VIEW it, NIH can’t REVIEW it!



    • ASSIST: two business day viewing window, the application automatically moves forward to NIH for further processing.public.era.nih.gov/assist

    • Online help: era.nih.gov/erahelp/ASSIST/

    • Applying Electronically Website for Multi-project Applications: grants.nih.gov/grants/ElectronicReceipt/com_index.htm

    • Webinar for Applicants:

      • grants.nih.gov/grants/webinar_docs/webinar_20121213.htm

    • Annotated form set: grants.nih.gov/grants/ElectronicReceipt/files/annotated_multi-project.pdf


    Summary two business day viewing window, the application automatically moves forward to NIH for further processing.

    Large and Complex Proposals can be submitted smoothly if the team is assembled early, roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, and everyone works together with a Commitment to Achieve the Rewards!


    Thank you

    Thank You! two business day viewing window, the application automatically moves forward to NIH for further processing.

    Diane Meyer, [email protected]

    Jerry Weinberg, [email protected]

    Nicole Nichols, [email protected]


    ad