Grading of technical institutions in the state of haryana engineering colleges
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 29

Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana (Engineering Colleges) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 67 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana (Engineering Colleges). By Empanelled Agencies. About Us. EQUATE = Effective Quality Upgradation Assistance for Technical Education

Download Presentation

Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana (Engineering Colleges)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Grading of technical institutions in the state of haryana engineering colleges

Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana(Engineering Colleges)

By

Empanelled Agencies


About us

About Us

  • EQUATE = Effective Quality Upgradation Assistance for Technical Education

  • A national level Consultancy Organization set up expert academicians involved in planning, designing, implementing and facilitating World Bank funded technician/technical education projects for MHRD since 1990.

  • Supported by pool of eminent educationists, scholars and educational planners.


About us1

About Us…

EQUATE - brain child of Dr. R.N. Mathur, Founder President and Former Central Project Advisor, NPIU - More than 30 years in education sector

- Contributed to a large number of Internationally funded Projects.

As Head of NPIU, took initiative to launch Quality Movement in World Bank funded technician institutions in NE States - all the institutions achieved ISO 9001:2000 certification.


Grading objectives

Grading Objectives

  • Motivate the institution to enhance the quality of education.

  • Generate healthy academic competition among growing institutions

  • Enhance institutional image before the stakeholders

  • Enable the students during admission counseling to make clear effective choice of institution they prefer to study in and

  • Build the image of the Directorate of Technical Education, Government of Haryana as a quality provider of technical education in the country.

EQUATE


Methodology

Methodology

  • Structured questionnaire designed separate questionnaire for new and old institutions

  • Institutional heads/representatives to be briefed about parameters of grading – Questionnaire to be handed over with request to fill in the required information before the visit of Expert Investigators (EI)

  • EIs will visit institutions for checking and verification of fact, figures and information – meet HODs, faculty, staff students, Administration and Finance Departments

EQUATE


Methodology1

Methodology

  • List of Documents to be collected by EIs provided at the end of questionnaire

  • List of Documents to be kept ready for verification and review by EEIs to be kept ready by the institution before the visit of the EI

  • Coordinator’s office to inform the schedule of visit of the EIs to institutions and Empanelled Agency in advance

EQUATE


Methodology2

Methodology

  • Five Broad Areas of Grading

    • Institutional Profile (70)

    • Governance, Leadership and Financial Management (150)

    • Infrastructure (150)

    • Human Resource(250)

    • Teaching Learning, Evaluation and Quality Assurance Processes(380)

      Total 1000

  • EIs selected with care, thoroughly briefed by the Empanelled Agency

  • 2 EIs will visit institutions on mutually agreed dates

  • EQUATE


    Methodology3

    Methodology

    EQUATE


    Methodology4

    Methodology

    • Institutions started in 2008-09 to provide data from date of establishment

    • Information to be provided as available up to or as on the date of the visit of the EIs

    • Response to the questionnaire as:

      • Tick mark

      • Figures or information on each item where space provided

    EQUATE


    Methodology5

    Methodology

    • Scores will be calculated by EIs

    • Grades received to be Presented to Grading Finalization Committee by the Empanelled Agency

    • Institutions have option to get re-evaluated after 2-3 months within same academic year after initiating substantial improvements

    • Separate exercise to be taken up in new academic session

    EQUATE


    Broad grading criteria

    Broad Grading Criteria

    • Grading not an attempt to check if AICTE norms followed or not – institutions have to follow the AICTE norms in all circumstances

    • Quality and Progress related areas included in questionnaires

    EQUATE


    Broad grading criteria 1 institutional profile

    Broad Grading Criteria(1) Institutional Profile


    Broad grading criteria 2 institutional governance leadership and financial management

    Broad Grading Criteria(2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT


    Broad grading criteria 2 institutional governance leadership and financial management1

    Broad Grading Criteria(2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT


    Broad grading criteria 2 institutional governance leadership and financial management2

    Broad Grading Criteria(2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT


    Broad grading criteria 3 infrastructure

    Broad Grading Criteria(3) INFRASTRUCTURE


    Broad grading criteria 4 human resources

    Broad Grading Criteria(4)HUMAN RESOURCES


    Broad grading criteria 4 human resources1

    Broad Grading Criteria(4)HUMAN RESOURCES


    Broad grading criteria 4 human resources2

    Broad Grading Criteria(4)HUMAN RESOURCES


    Broad grading criteria 4 human resources3

    Broad Grading Criteria(4)HUMAN RESOURCES


    Broad grading criteria 5 teaching learning evaluation quality assurance processes

    Broad Grading Criteria(5) TEACHING LEARNING, EVALUATION & QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESSES


    Broad grading criteria 5 teaching learning evaluation quality assurance processes1

    Broad Grading Criteria(5)TEACHING LEARNING, EVALUATION & QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESSES


    Documents to be collected by expert investigators team

    Documents to be collected by Expert Investigators Team

    • Institutional recognition by AICTE.

    • University affiliation.

    • Composition of BOG of the Institute.

    • Minutes of the last 2 BOG meetings.

    • List of Head of Institution since starting.

    • Minutes of last two meeting of HODs with Head of Institution.

    • Delegation of financial power to Principal, HOD, Faculty.

    • Office order regarding library hours.

    • A copy of latest News Letter.


    Documents and facts to be reviewed by experts investigators team

    Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team

    • Payroll of faculty and other staff

    • Match no. of labs with AICTE norms.

    • See documents indicating building maintaining committee or cell.

    • Equipments maintenance cell.

    • Fund availability in corpus fund.

    • No. of students receive free ship.

    • No. of students receive scholarship in current year.


    Documents and facts to be reviewed by experts investigators team1

    Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team

    • Involvement of faculty in purchasing.

    • Institutional strategic plan, vision, mission, Institutional quality policy.

    • Annual calendar of activities.

    • Working of Institutional MIS.

    • Campus wide networking and internet facilities.

    • Networking availability in hostels.

    • Check all infrastructure facility including cleanliness, power supply, power backup, condition of class rooms, common rooms, tutorial, library, administrative block, water supply.

    • Availability of digital library, internet facility in library.


    Documents and facts to be reviewed by experts investigators team2

    Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team

    • Availability of distance education and mechanism.

    • Hard copies and electronics journals.

    • Availability of stock register, lab manuals.

    • Check some appointments orders of faculty.

    • Check evidence of training conducted for faculty and other staff.

    • See orders for faculty qualification improvement with salary.

    • Evidence of consultancy projects.


    Documents and facts to be reviewed by experts investigators team3

    Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team

    • Evidence of incentive for innovative work.

    • Availability of Insurance, Provident Fund and Medical facilities.

    • Evidence of publication, patent, research projects, paper presentation, award for faculty.

    • Evidence of Revenue Generated and Utilization.

    • Student percentage of marks at admission.

    • Check foreign students if available.

    • Check attendance of class and sessionals.

    • Check no. of working days.


    Documents and facts to be reviewed by experts investigators team4

    Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team

    • Documents of Alumni association.

    • Documents of tracer study.

    • Check all aspects of classroom strategy planning.

    • Check all facts related to competency and skills.

    • Check all evidence related to lab and workshops.


    Grading of technical institutions in the state of haryana engineering colleges

    THANK YOU

    EQUATE


  • Login