1 / 34

Linden, New Jersey

This study investigates the role of alcohol impairment and speed enforcement in a fatal accident on U.S. 1 in Linden, New Jersey. Recommendations include improved enforcement, criteria for median barriers, and driver health evaluations.

lieselotte
Download Presentation

Linden, New Jersey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Linden, New Jersey May 1, 2003

  2. Water puddle 6-inch raised median curb Mercedes at final rest Ford at final rest

  3. Parties to the Investigation • Federal Highway Administration • New Jersey Department of Transportation • City of Linden, New Jersey, Police Department • No public hearing, depositions, or party submissions

  4. Major Issues Identified • Alcohol impairment • Speed enforcement • Criteria for the use of median barriers on high-volume, high-speed roadways

  5. Proposed Recommendations • Federal Highway Administration • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials • City of Linden, New Jersey • Reiterated safety recommendation to State of New Jersey

  6. Human Performance

  7. Overview • Driver experience and health • Driver activities • Toxicology • Fatigue and alcohol

  8. Experience/Health • Properly licensed • No current or pending license suspensions • No record of recent accidents or moving violations • Described as being in “good health”

  9. Driver Activities • Driver had “nontraditional” schedule • Did not work the 2 days before the accident • Active in the 12 hours prior to crash • Stopped at a bar • Played softball • Returned to the bar • Spoke with a friend

  10. Toxicology • Negative for illicit drugs • Testing found alcohol • 0.326% in blood (BAC) • 0.379% in urine • 0.210% in vitreous humor • Levels indicate significant alcohol consumption

  11. Alcohol and Driving • Impairment seen at 0.02% • Driving-related behaviors impaired at 0.08% • Higher BAC levels result in greater impairment • Functioning at this level suggests alcohol tolerance

  12. Tolerance • Not immunity • Learned through practice • Problem lies in unexpected events • Driver steering response consistent with negated tolerance

  13. Operator Fatigue and Alcohol • Alcohol and sleep interact • Driver’s sleep night before accident unknown • Combined effect of alcohol consumption and low-quality sleep impaired performance

  14. HIGHWAY ISSUES

  15. Highway Safety Issues • Motorists do not comply with the 40-mph speed limit • No median barrier at accident location

  16. Speed Data for U.S. 1 • Calculated speed of Mercedes was 62 mph • Roadway design speed of 45 mph • Posted speed limit is 40 mph • No records of a speed survey being conducted prior to the accident

  17. 40-mph speed limit NTSB Speed Study Recorded speed Number of vehicles

  18. Consequences of Speeding • Nationwide, speeding contributed to 30 percent of all fatal accidents reported in 2004 • Increases the severity of crash forces • Reduces the ability to steer around curves and obstacles • Increases vehicle stopping distance • Reduces a driver’s ability to react to dangerous situations

  19. Linden P.D. Speed Enforcement • Officials were aware of problem • Police department lacked the resources to address the problem

  20. 3 southbound lanes 6-inch-high raised median 3 northbound lanes Accident Location U.S. 1 near milepost 41.4 Ford at final rest Mercedes at final rest

  21. Beginning of median barrier Accident location North Source: Linden P.D.

  22. Southbound Approach on U.S. 1

  23. Northbound Approach on U.S. 1

  24. No median barrier Source: Microsoft

  25. Postaccident Evaluation • New Jersey DOT evaluated the accident site for a median barrier • Determined a barrier was not needed • Nothing to prevent another catastrophic crash

  26. AASHTO Roadside Design Guide • AASHTO establishes guidance for roadway design • Barriers should only be used if the consequence of striking the barrier are less severe than if no barrier existed • Severity of the accident would have been reduced had a barrier been installed in place of a raised median

  27. Trip points Source: Linden Police Department

  28. Median Barrier Evaluation • High-speed, controlled-access roadways • High-volume, non-controlled-access roadways • Multilane expressways • Highways with partial control of access • Lack of evaluative criteria

More Related