1 / 11

Orange Grove Elementary 2010-11 Accountability Report

Orange Grove Elementary 2010-11 Accountability Report. OGISD Board of Trustees September 19, 2011. State Accountability System. Subjects Measured by TAKS test Reading, Math Student Groups Measured All Students, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged

liesel
Download Presentation

Orange Grove Elementary 2010-11 Accountability Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Orange Grove Elementary2010-11 Accountability Report OGISD Board of Trustees September 19, 2011

  2. State Accountability System • Subjects Measured by TAKS test • Reading, Math • Student Groups Measured • All Students, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged • Also Measures Commended Performance Rates, and English Language Learner (ELL) Progress Measure

  3. State Accountability System • Exemplary • 90% Passing Rate for Each Student Group • 25% or Higher Commended Performance Rate • Recognized • 80% Passing Rate for Each Student Group • 15% or Higher Commended Performance Rate • Academically Acceptable • 70% Passing Rate for Each Student Group in Reading, Writing, Social Studies • 65% Passing Rate in Math for Each Student Group • 60% Passing Rate in Science for Each Student Group • Unacceptable: any score below Acceptable cutoff

  4. Major Changes To The State Accountability System • The State of Texas Accountability System had major changes for the 2010-2011 school year • Discontinued the use of the Texas Projection Measure (TPM) • Added a standard for Commended Performance • 15% or higher for Recognized • 25% or higher for Exemplary • Included the scores of all special education students including students who took the TAKS Modified and the TAKS Alternate Assessments • Added a standard for English Language Learners (ELLs) • 60% or higher of ELLs must either progress one level on their Texas English Language Proficiency System (TELPAS) rating • Pass the reading/ELA TAKS test • Meet the standard on the TELPAS reading section • The state has been in the process of increasing the rigor of the TAKS tests over the past few years

  5. Definition of Terms • Commended Performance Rate • of students who score at the commended performance level for each subject area and in the All Students and Economically Disadvantaged student groups • 15% or higher for Recognized • 25% or higher for Exemplary • English Language Learner Progress Measure • Combines results from TAKS reading/ELA and Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) • Met the passing standard on TAKS reading/ELA test, or • Met their proficiency level on TELPAS reading test, or • Showed progress on TELPAS reading from the prior year • 60% or higher must meet standard These two indicators are new for the 2010-2011 school year

  6. Campus TAKS Reading/ELA

  7. TAKS Math Data

  8. State Accountability: Campus SummaryUsing Absolute Standards • Exemplary: Reading • Recognized: Math • Exemplary: Commended Performance Rate Reading • Recognized: Commended Performance Rate Math • Campus Rating: Recognized

  9. Federal Accountability System: AYP • Adequate Yearly Progress • AYP measures Reading and Math, using TAKS scores • All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged, and SpecialEducation • Two Ratings • Met AYP: 80% each group Reading; 75% each group Math • Missed AYP: any score by any group below 80% or 75% • Elementary Rating: Met AYP • Reading—93% (Special Education – 64%) • Math—87% (Special Education – 36%)

  10. Now What? • The Campus Improvement Plan will address • State Accountability: • Math • Special Education • Change to the STAAR assessment • Federal Accountability: • Special Education in Reading & Math • Access to the Regular Curriculum through Inclusion • Reducing the number of students who take STAAR Modified

  11. Campus Goals • The District and each Campus will attain and maintain Exemplar rating As a Campus, we did not maintain Exemplary status. • We are at Exemplary levels with our scores in the area of Reading. • We are at Recognized levels with our scores in the area of Math and special education performance • The accountability system changed from last year to this year • Texas Projection Measure (TPM) was discontinued • All special education students scores (including the TAKS Modified and TAKS Alternate) were included • Commended Performance standards • English Language Learner (ELL) Progress standards • Our commitment is to continue to increase our percent passing and our advanced academic performance percentages as we move into the era of STAAR assessments

More Related