1 / 29

Preparing for RAC ? Strengthen Your Denials Management Process

Preparing for RAC ? Strengthen Your Denials Management Process. December 19, 2008. Practical, Innovative, Medical Management Solutions. PREPARING FOR “ RAC ATTACK ”. Goal Develop a proactive attack plan to prevent financial risk for the organization Assemble a RAC Taskforce

libitha
Download Presentation

Preparing for RAC ? Strengthen Your Denials Management Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Preparing for RAC? Strengthen Your Denials Management Process December 19, 2008 Practical, Innovative, Medical Management Solutions

  2. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Goal Develop a proactive attack plan to prevent financial risk for the organization Assemble a RAC Taskforce Interdisciplinary approach with core players: Utilization Review Medical Records Risk and Outcomes Director Patient Financial Services Director Information Technology Representative Physician Representative (in-house or contracted)

  3. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Determining the Action Plan • Establish line of authority for hospital wide RAC program • Use existing data to analyze/identify denial drivers • Perform in-house audits and determine hospital wide and system weaknesses • Establish process improvement plans • Develop an interdepartmental tracking system

  4. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” In-House Physician Advisors PROS • Decrease hospital expense • No contingency fees • Existing internal peer relationships CONS • Increases existing physicians work load • Physician often not be specialized in denials management • Difficulty persuading others to embrace practice improvements • Limited ability to produce valuable educational reports and denial tracking reports

  5. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Results Achieved: Denials Outsourcing FYE 2005 - 29.54% of Total Cost denied - 21.00% overturned after in-house appeal FYE 2006 - 27.53% of Total Cost denied - 44.90% recovered utilizing physician appeal Summary Significant Denials Decrease: - 19.50% is the average recovery prior to program launch - 29.00% is the sustained recoveries since 2006

  6. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Demonstration Project RAC Statistics • 32% medical necessity denials • 42% incorrect coding denials • 9% insufficient clinical • 88% inpatient • 11% appealed • 5% overturned • 42% of hospitals had no denials issued

  7. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” • Denials Increasing from Numerous Sources • CMS Denials • RAC Denials • Emergence of Medicare “Never Events” Denials • Increased Denials • Medicaid MCO’s • FFS Medicaid • Commercial Payors • Use RAC Preparations as Catalyst to Revamp your Denials Management Process

  8. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Key Components of an Effective Denials Strategy Primary Strategy - Proactive Prevention • Use data to identify key drivers of denials • Develop processes to mitigate these drivers thereby further reducing denials • Minimize denials through an effective Concurrent Review/Case Management and notification process Supporting Strategy - Denials Recovery • Aggressive appeals process recover denied dollars • Close the loop between approval and payment

  9. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Primary Strategy: Data Management • Audit existing data to identify opportunities for improvement including areas of RAC emphasis • Use audit results to develop processes that address identified areas of opportunity • Enhance existing UM/CM/SW processes based on audit findings • Develop educational sessions as needed • Re-assess and monitor impact of newly implemented processes

  10. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Using Data to Identify Opportunities Audit charts for each RAC area of emphasis • Objective chart review using CMS medical necessity criteria (InterQual) • Subjective chart review using physician medical judgment • Data capture and analysis of denial variables Analyze audited data and existing denials data • Diagnosis • Physician • Denial type • Delay reason

  11. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Denials Management Tracking and Audit Application

  12. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Building Processes to Minimize Denials • Obtain buy in from key stake holders to improve chances of success - Physicians, nursing, UM, IT • Prioritize process improvement to maximize returns • Select improvements with highest success rate - Broadest impact across all payor types - Simple implementation • Primarily systems enhancements • Minimal resource allocation - Enhance and strengthen existing processes

  13. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Building Processes to Minimize Denials Examples of Process Improvement Activities • Short stay denials • RAC emphasis • UM/CM/SW process enhancements - Improve communications with payors • Education - Use data to identify educational activities for staff - Employ external resources as needed

  14. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Short Stay Denials • Case manager assigned to ER to review admissions for select diagnosis based on audit results • Consult done in ER when possible prior to admission • Consider implementing rapid chest pain protocol • Educate ER staff on admissions criteria for commonly denied diagnosis

  15. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” UM/CM Process Enhancements • Hold carriers to timely denial notification by denial log • Use log to eliminate denials for no clinical and to drive peer-to-peer process • Use denials audit results to focus case management and discharge planning activities • Work closely with payor case manager on complex cases

  16. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Education • Use denial audit results to guide educational initiatives • Physician and UM/CM/SW educational sessions based on frequently denied diagnosis • Hospitalist groups respond positively with impressive end results • Individual physician improvements more difficult to accomplish

  17. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Secondary Strategy Denials Recovery Ensure processes are in place to maximize denied claims recovery • Develop strong appeals capabilities • Ensure aggressive payment follow through • Ensure strong data capture and reporting capabilities • Use data to identify areas of opportunity to enhance the entire process • Close the loop on denials prevention CQI

  18. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Advantages of Physician Led Appeals • Recognized as clinical expert vs other clinicians • Able to challenge payers and provide clinical conviction • Peer-to-peer review shown to prevent 15% of denials • RAC auditors must provide a physician for peer-to-peer when requested • Select payors now require a physicians’ name on the appeal

  19. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” The Appeal Process Types of Appeals • Informal peer-to-peer as soon as denial is identified, 1 day of denial • First Level appeal with medical records, 15 to 180 days depending on payor • Second Level for some payors – typically 30 to 90 days • Third Level – for some payors – typically 30 to 90 days • External appeals - usually through the MIA or CMS Complexity of Appeals • Multiple payors  Multiple rules • Multiple levels  Multiple time frames • Multiple regulators

  20. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” A Staged Approach to Appeals Management Automation and Data Management Research & Approval Strategy Development MCO Submission Denial Mitigation through Education MCO Process Management Denial Process & Intervention Reporting Payment Management Process Appeal Response Determination Process

  21. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Internal Appeals Process • A strong appeals process is critical in developing a successful denials mitigation program. • The components of a successful appeals process include: - Identifying the denial as soon as possible - Collecting medical necessity information - Generating the appeals letter - Managing the payor’s appeal response process - Appeal response determination process - Payment management process - Data management, reporting and performance improvement

  22. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Identifying the Denial • The EOB is the gold standard and should be cross referenced with other denial sources to ensure denials are correctly identified • For carriers with a short appeal response timeframe the denial must be identified before the EOB is received • Most denials are identified through the denial letter sent from the payor or phone calls • Payor’s daily log is a good source for identifying denials

  23. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” The Medical Necessity Argument • Critical components necessary for success • Timeliness is critical and requires a complex and efficient process to meet the varying requirements of numerous insurers. • Medical necessity knowledge is key to a successful appeal and often requires the leadership and input of a UM trained physician • Intimate knowledge of criteria sets (Milliman, InterQual etc.)

  24. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Managing The Appeal Response Process • All appeals documentation must be: - Sent by certified mail - Tracking option activated - Follow-up calls to facilitate return of late appeals • Payors fail to return 35% of initial appeals for a variety of reasons • Depending on the insurer, only 35% to 60% of appeals are completed within the required 30 days • Process difficult to monitor without an appeals tracking system

  25. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” • Once an appeal response is received a decision must be made on next steps • If approved, clearly payment must be pursued • If denied: • Should a Level 2 or 3 be pursued? • Should the account be closed? • Should an external review be filed? • Between 10% to 25% of Level 2 or 3 appeals can be overturned • Significant medical necessity knowledge is needed to assess which appeals warrant a Level 2 or 3

  26. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” From Approval to Payment • Assign accountability for payment follow-up • Close the loop between approval and payment • Follow-up with payor to ensure 100% of approvals are paid • Pay close attention to TPA’s

  27. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Data Management, Reporting and Performance Improvement • Provide monthly results to key players • Status reports provide updates on the appeals process • Actionable reports drive the CQI process • Monitor impact of process improvement activities with tracking and trending of data

  28. PREPARING FOR “RAC ATTACK” Summary • Preparation is key • Minimize operational disruptions … its just another denial • RAC demonstration – 42% of facilities had zero denials • Use the opportunity to enhance your denials management process … and come out ahead • Reporting and continuous process improvement are critical

  29. Case Management Covenants, LLC Case Management Covenants is a Maryland based healthcare consulting services company specializing in denial management, appeal management and RAC audit preparation services. Key Staff Contacts President: Olakunle Olaniyan, M.D. – still a practicing physician and former managed care VP and CMO. Chief Operations Officer: Iskla “Chris” Brown - nurse executive with many years experience in healthcare accreditation organizations, commercial and government health insurance entities. Vice President, Business Development: Doug Allen – a strategic planning professional with significant experience in both the commercial and non-profit healthcare sectors. 410-715-4913

More Related