Cognitive processes psy 334 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

Cognitive Processes PSY 334 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 115 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Cognitive Processes PSY 334. Chapter 4 – Perception-Based Knowledge Representation. Midterm Results . Top score = 40 Top score for curve = 40. Verbal Imagery vs Visual Imagery. The mind operates upon internal representations of knowledge.

Download Presentation

Cognitive Processes PSY 334

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Cognitive processes psy 334 l.jpg

Cognitive ProcessesPSY 334

Chapter 4 – Perception-Based Knowledge Representation


Midterm results l.jpg

Midterm Results

Top score = 40 Top score for curve = 40


Verbal imagery vs visual imagery l.jpg

Verbal Imagery vs Visual Imagery

  • The mind operates upon internal representations of knowledge.

  • How is visual information (imagery) represented in memory?

  • Paivio’s Dual-Code Theory – memory is better if we encode information visually and verbally.

    • Separate representations are maintained for verbal and visual information.


Behavioral evidence for dual codes l.jpg

Behavioral Evidence for Dual Codes

  • Santa compared linear and spatial arrays of:

    • Three geometric objects

    • Three names of geometric objects

  • Subjects were asked whether the arrays contained the same objects or names.

  • Subjects were faster when shapes were in the same spatial arrangement but faster when words were linear.


Santa s results l.jpg

Santa’s Results


Evidence from brain imaging l.jpg

Evidence From Brain Imaging

  • Subjects were asked to mentally rehearse:

    • A word jingle

    • Navigating their neighborhood

  • Increased blood flow occurred in different areas of the brain, depending upon the task.

  • The same brain areas were active as when actually speaking or seeing.


Brain evidence for dual codes l.jpg

Brain Evidence for Dual Codes


Mental rotation l.jpg

Mental Rotation

  • Shepard – two-dimensional and three-dimensional mental images are rotated in the same way as actual objects.

    • The more an object is rotated, the longer it takes to respond in a same/different task.

  • Georgopoulos et al. – measured neurons firing in monkey brains when moving a handle.

    • Intermediate cells fire showing rotation.


Shepard metzler s results l.jpg

Shepard & Metzler’s Results

2D

3D


Image scanning l.jpg

Image Scanning

  • Brooks – subjects scanned imagined diagrams (like letter F) and noted outside corners, or sentences noting nouns.

    • Respond by saying “yes” or “no”

    • Tap left hand for “yes,” right hand for “no”

    • Point to Y or N on a sheet

  • Scanning a sheet for Y’s & N’s conflicted with scanning the mental image.

    • Conflict is spatial not visual.


Slide13 l.jpg

Mentally imagine the F and scan the outline beginning at the *.

Point to Y if an outside corner is present or N if not.


Pointing was slowest l.jpg

Pointing Was Slowest


Comparing visual quantities l.jpg

Comparing Visual Quantities

  • Time to make a judgment decreases as the difference in size between objects increases.

    • The smaller the difference the longer it takes to make a judgment.

  • Which is larger:

    • moose or roach, wolf or lion?

  • The same pattern emerges when asked to judge actual differences, line lengths.


Which is bigger l.jpg

Which is bigger?

The closer in size, two animals are, the longer it takes to decide which is bigger.


Two types of imagery l.jpg

Two Types of Imagery

  • Images involving visual properties (what) -- impaired with temporal damage.

  • Images involving spatial properties (where) – impaired with parietal damage.

  • Bilateral temporal lobe damage:

    • Difficulty judging color, size, shape.

    • No deficit in mental rotation, image or letter scanning, judgment of relative positions.


Are images like perception l.jpg

Are Images Like Perception?

  • A series of experiments to compare perception and imagery:

    • Imagining transformations of mental images vs perceived stimuli.

    • Ponzo illusions occur with imagery.

    • Difficulty with reversible figures – depends on instructions, harder.

  • MRI plots show same brain activity.


Similar brain activity l.jpg

Similar Brain Activity

Fusiform face area

Parahippocampal place area


Is imagery epiphenomenal l.jpg

Is Imagery Epiphenomenal?

  • Does imagery play a functional role in thinking or is it a subjective side-effect?

  • Kosslyn et al. showed that subjects could make judgments about arrays held in mind:

    • Which has longer stripes?

    • Visual regions (V17)became active duringimagery.


Cognitive maps l.jpg

Cognitive Maps

  • Two kinds of maps:

    • Route map – indicates places and turns, but not all landmarks.

    • Survey map – shows all relevant portions of space, not just route.

  • Adults produce survey maps, kids produce route maps.

  • Survey maps more versatile.


Examples l.jpg

Examples

  • Disneyland to Cal Poly Pomona via Yahoo Maps

  • http://maps.yahoo.com/#mvt=m&lat=33.932385&lon=-117.85789&zoom=12&q1=disneyland%2C%20anaheim&q2=3801%20W%20Temple%20Ave%2C%20Pomona%2C%20CA%2C%2091768


Navigation l.jpg

Navigation

  • Navigation is complicated by the need to tie together different kinds of mental representations.

  • Egocentric representation – space “as we see it”

  • Allocentric representation – not specific to a particular viewpoint

    • Most maps are allocentric


Types of representations l.jpg

Types of Representations

Egocentric

Allocentric


Thinking about maps l.jpg

Thinking About Maps

  • People rotate physical maps to fit their egocentric perspective.

    • When the map itself cannot be rotated, extra processing time shows that people rotate an image of the map in their heads.

  • Cognitive maps show no orientation effects.

  • Allocentric representations are maintained by the hippocampus.


Map distortions l.jpg

Map Distortions

  • Which is farther east: San Diego or Reno?

  • People make wrong guesses because they reason from the positions of the states, not cities.

  • Relative positions of larger areas are compared, not details – hierarchical chunking.


Slide27 l.jpg

Which is farther East: San Diego or Reno?

Which is farther North: Seattle or Montreal?

Which is farther West: the Atlantic or the Pacific entrance to the Panama Canal?


Slide28 l.jpg

Atlantic


Translating verbal descriptions l.jpg

Translating Verbal Descriptions

  • Subjects were asked to read passages, rotate themselves and make judgments:

    • Fastest when making above-below judgments, slower with right-left.

  • Verbal directions (survey or route) are as good as using actual maps.


Franklin tversky s study l.jpg

Franklin & Tversky’s Study

Some directions are faster to interpret verbally and orient ourselves in than others.


Overlap of visual perception and visual imagery l.jpg

Overlap of Visual Perception and Visual Imagery


  • Login