1 / 18

Absence Management – the Legal Side!

Absence Management – the Legal Side!. 1. Statistics (CBI stats on 2010). 190 million days lost, £17bn Sickness absence increased in 2010, despite fit notes Two-thirds believe fit notes not helped 6.5 days average (8.1 public sector/5.9 private sector) “Sickies” – 30.4m days, £2.7 bn.

liang
Download Presentation

Absence Management – the Legal Side!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Absence Management – the Legal Side!

  2. 1. Statistics (CBI stats on 2010) • 190 million days lost, £17bn • Sickness absence increased in 2010, despite fit notes • Two-thirds believe fit notes not helped • 6.5 days average (8.1 public sector/5.9 private sector) • “Sickies” – 30.4m days, £2.7 bn

  3. 2. Managing Absence • Short term persistent • Long term • Disability related • Unauthorised • The “sickie”

  4. 3. Key Foundations • Rules and procedures • Absence management (capability) policy - reporting sickness - provision of self-certification/fit notes - return to work interviews - sick pay provisions - provision for medical examinations [cont…]

  5. 4. Key Foundations (cont) - rehabilitation and EAPs - trigger mechanisms, ie. Bradford Factor or variations - procedure for handling long term and disability-related - consequences for unauthorised absences/non-genuine absence

  6. 5. Managing Short Term Persistent Absences • Self-certification forms • Return to work interviews • Trigger mechanisms • Bradford factor – measure absenteeism, tackle short frequent and unplanned absences – more disruptive • Warning procedure [cont ...]

  7. 6. Managing Short Term Persistent Absences (cont) • International Sports Co Ltd v. Thomson – dismissal fair as long as fair review of attendance record, chance to make representations and forewarned about dismissal if things do not improve • Watch out for underlying health condition – may change reasonableness of warning process

  8. 7. Bradford Factor or Similar Trigger Mechanisms • B = (SxS) x D • B = Bradford Score • S = number of instances of absence in set period • D = number of days absence in set period • Eg. one instance of 10 days absence = 10 points / 10 instances of 1 day absences = 1000 points • Trigger points set at level where employer deems absence levels unacceptable • Take care – disability discrimination and need to make reasonable adjustments, dependant care leave

  9. 8. Unauthorised and Sickies • Unauthorised – failure to follow sickness absence procedures – unless just reason = conduct issue, not capability and so adopt disciplinary process with warning • Non-genuine illness – difficult, need evidence of malingering, each case turns on its own facts, may need to get medical input where allegation of “exaggeration” – see Pacey v. Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd 2011

  10. 9. Long Term Sick – Key Principles • Regular contact (ACAS and CIPD) – sympathetic approach • Rehabilitation and return to work strategies (CIPD) • Medical investigation (ACAS and CIPD) – occupational health, not GPs • Consider AMRA 1988 – “medical report” defined as one prepared by medical practitioner who is or has been responsible for the clinical care of employee [cont]

  11. 10. Long Term Sick – Key Principles (cont) • Be clear about sick pay arrangements (ACAS) • Consultation (ACAS and CIPD) • Return to work plans including adjustments and alternative work (ACAS and CIPD) • Forewarning that employment is at risk (ACAS)

  12. 11. Fair Dismissal • “Capability” – fair reason • Reasonableness • Adopt key principles of consultation, investigation and alternatives • Nature, length and effect of illness • Cause of illness – RBS v. McAdie 2008 – “irrelevant” but may need to go extra mile • Length of service – more tolerance to hardworking/longer serving employees (Clarke v. Pickering Kenyon 1993) [cont…]

  13. 12. Fair Dismissal (cont) • Importance of the job/feasibility of temporary replacements • Effect on other employees, output and sales • Size of organisation and administrative resources • Health and safety considerations • Sick pay – arrangements do not indicate the amount of sickness absence employee entitled to • Entitlement to permanent health insurance – implied right not to be dismissed

  14. 13. Disabilities • Equality Act 2010 • Physical or mental, long term and substantial effect on ability to carry out day to day activities • Removed need that impairment must affect one or more specified capacities – easier to satisfy definition • Long term – 12 months or “likely” to be 12 months • “Likely” = “could well happen” (SCA Packaging Ltd v. Boyle 2009) • NB – includes fluctuating and recurring conditions [cont…]

  15. 14. Disabilities (cont) • Long term absence dismissals run the risk of indirect discrimination, discrimination arising from a disability and a failure to make reasonable adjustments • Defence to indirect and discrimination arising from a disability = objective justification • Likely that the defence of objective justification will overlap with obligation to make reasonable adjustments

  16. 15. Disability Discrimination • Dismissal may be fair but breach of EA 2010 • Separate considerations • Disability discrimination does not prevent an employer dismissing an employee absent due to ill health which is a disability (Royal Liverpool Children’s NHS Trust v. Dunsby 2006) – just need to justify dismissal [cont …]

  17. 16. Disability Discrimination (cont) • Detailed consideration of alternatives and reasonable adjustments – need occupational health input and consult with employee • “Adjustment(s)” must be effective to remove disadvantage • Sick pay – O’Hanlon v. Commissioners for HMRC 2007

  18. Taylors Solicitors Employment Team Oliver McCann – Elaine Hurn Rawlings HouseExchange StreetBLACKBURNBB1 7JN Ninth Floor 80 Mosley Street MANCHESTER M2 3FX Tel: 0844 8000 263 www.taylors.com

More Related