slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
B. E. PROJECT DRAG FORCE ANALYSIS OF CAR PROJECTEES ABHISHEK KUMAR RAVISHEK KUMAR ASHWIN TEMBHURNEY ABHISHEK GOMASE GUIDE

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 26

Project Presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 892 Views
  • Uploaded on

B. E. PROJECT DRAG FORCE ANALYSIS OF CAR PROJECTEES ABHISHEK KUMAR RAVISHEK KUMAR ASHWIN TEMBHURNEY ABHISHEK GOMASE GUIDE Prof. R. M. Metkar SESSION 2005-2006 DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING G. H. RAISONI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, NAGPUR.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Project Presentation' - liam


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

B. E. PROJECT

DRAG FORCE ANALYSIS OF CAR

PROJECTEES

ABHISHEK KUMAR RAVISHEK KUMAR

ASHWIN TEMBHURNEY ABHISHEK GOMASE

GUIDE

Prof. R. M. Metkar

SESSION 2005-2006

DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

G. H. RAISONI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,

NAGPUR.

contents
CONTENTS
  • Introduction
  • Motivation
  • Regimes of External Flow
  • Profile Drag
  • Minimizing Drag on a LMV
  • Expression For Drag Force
  • Stream-lined and Bluff Body
  • Components of Drag
  • Thrust Vs Speed of Car
  • Geometry generation in pro/e wildfire
  • Analysis in CFD Tutor 1.1
  • Calculations and Result
  • Limitations
  • Conclusion
  • References
introduction
INTRODUCTION
  • Decreasing the fuel consumption of road vehicles.
  • Drag is one of the most important issues when it comes to Aerodynamics design of road vehicles
motivation
MOTIVATION
  • Designing a vehicle with a minimized drag resistance provides economy and performance advantages.
  • The main motivation for reducing drag resistance is:

• Fuel consumption reduction

• Performance increasing

regimes of external flow
REGIMES OF EXTERNAL FLOW

FLOW REGIMES AROUND AN IMMERSED BODY

slide6

PROFILE DRAG

  • Pressure drag
  • Friction drag

Profile drag = Pressure drag + Friction drag

PRESSURE DRAG AIRFLOW ORIENTATION

expression for drag force
Expression For Drag Force
  • The Drag force value for a moving vehicle is given by the following expression.

DF =1/2 A ρ CD V2

where ,

CD is the drag coefficient

A is the projected frontal area of the vehicle

ρ is the density of air

V is the speed of the vehicle relatively to the air

minimizing drag on a lmv car
MINIMIZING DRAG ON A LMV(CAR)

SHAPE OF VEHICLE’S BODY

slide13

GEOMETRY GENERATION IN PRO/E WILDFIRE

DIMENSIONS : OVERALL LENGH 3335 mm

OVERALL WIDTH 1440 mm

2D SKETCH OF MARUTI 800

slide14

ANALYSIS IN CFD TUTOR 1.1

PRE- PROCESSING IN CFD TUTOR 1.1

Grid Generation for Maruti 800

slide15

PROCESSING OPERATIONS IN CFD TUTOR 1.1

Pressure distribution along the body of car

slide19

POST PROCESSING OPERATION IN CFD TUTOR 1.1

Pressure Distribution along the shape of car

calculations and result
CALCULATIONS AND RESULT

Drag Force, DF = 1/2 A ρ CD V2 ------------------------------ ----I

Pressure Drag, P = ∆P * A ------------------------------------------II

Equating Equation I and II, we get

∆P * A = 1/2 A ρ CD V2

Therefore, CD = 2 ∆P/ ρ V2 --------------------------------------III

For Mach No. = 0.05 (60 Km/hr)

Pmax = 1.0669 *105 Pa

Pmin = 1.0086* 105 Pa

∆P= 5830 Pa

ρ = 1.125 kg/m3

Vmax = 1.246 m3/ s

Put the values in equation III, we get

CD = 0.667

slide22

LIMITATIONS

  • Space Constraint
  • Styling may be the most flagrant example:

Consumers/buyers always seek for a

certain ‘look\'. This concept is today very

different from the aerodynamically ‘ideal’

car.

  • Drag and Lift Relation
conclusion
CONCLUSION
  • Smooth vehicle shape, rounded corners.
  • Tapered rear end.
  • Minimized body seams.
  • Substitution of rear view mirrors with Cameras.
  • Smooth underbody.
references
REFERENCES
  • Paper: Inchul Kim and Xin Geng, [2002], “Optimization of Body Shape

through Computation of Aerodynamic Forces on Low Mass Vehicle

(LMV)”, Department Of Mechanical Engineering, University Of

Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, Mi 48128.

  • Paper: Alexander Diehl, Jose Nuno Lopes, Rui Miranda, Christoffer

Mursu Simu and John Viji, autumn 2002, “Reducing Drag Forces

in Future Vehicles”, Department of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics,

Chalmers, University of Technology.

  • Paper: Frederque Muyl, Laurent Dumas and Vincent Herbert, [October

2001], “Hybrid method for Automotive Shape Optimization in

Automotive Industry, PSA Peugeot Citroen, Centre technique,

Veliz Villacoublay, France

  • Book: Fluid Mechanics By John F Douglas, Janusz M Gasiorek and John

A Swaffield, Published by Pearson Educations.

  • Websites: www.engin.umd.umich.edu/ceep/tech_day

www.maruti800.marutiudyog.com

www.princeton.edu/~asmits/Bicycle_web/blunt.html

  • Project Website: www.dragforceanalysis.tk
ad