1 / 44

How Resilient Are Mortgage Backed Securities to Collateralized Debt Obligation Market Disruptions

Criterion Economics L.L.C.. 2. Figure 1: U.S. Home Ownership 1965-2006. Source: Bureau of Census. Criterion Economics L.L.C.. 3. Figure 2: Home Equity Extracted and Available for Extraction 1995-2005. Source: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University (2006).. Criterion Economics L.L.C..

liam
Download Presentation

How Resilient Are Mortgage Backed Securities to Collateralized Debt Obligation Market Disruptions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 1 How Resilient Are Mortgage Backed Securities to Collateralized Debt Obligation Market Disruptions? Joseph R. Mason, Associate Professor of Finance, Drexel University Joshua Rosner, Managing Director, Graham Fisher & Co.

    2. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 2

    3. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 3 Figure 2: Home Equity Extracted and Available for Extraction 1995-2005

    4. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 4 Figure 3: Refinancing Behavior 1995-2005

    5. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 5 Figure 4: Piggyback Lending for Home Purchase 2001-2004

    6. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 6 Figure 5A: Investment Homes Share of Total Homes Purchased

    7. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 7 Figure 5B: Prime Market Investor Shares

    8. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 8 Figure 6: Five Year BBB- Floating Home Equity Spread to One-Month

    9. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 9 The Complexity of Securitization Mortgages and Mortgage-backed Securities Are Complex and Difficult to Value Complexity of Default vs Prepay Risk Additional Complexity in MBS Deep Tranching Unique Securities Examples

    10. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 10 The Complexity of Securitization Mortgages and Mortgage-backed Securities Are Complex and Difficult to Value Complexity of Default vs Prepay Risk Additional Complexity in MBS Deep Tranching Unique Securities Examples

    11. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 11 Default Models are Well-accepted Throughout the Mortgage Industry

    12. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 12 Figure 7: Prepayment and Default Rates as a Function of Mortgage Duration

    13. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 13 Typically Adjust for Prepayment Speeds with PSA Models

    14. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 14 Table 1: Regression Results (Dependent Variable Is Prepayments)

    15. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 15 The Complexity of Securitization Mortgages and Mortgage-backed Securities Are Complex and Difficult to Value Complexity of Default vs Prepay Risk Additional Complexity in MBS Deep Tranching Unique Securities Examples

    16. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 16 Figure 8: Tranches Issued in European Securitizations 1987-2003

    17. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 17 Table 2: Issues with the Given Number of Tranches as a Percentage of All Issues Per Type (Mean Number of Tranches Per Issue)

    18. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 18 The Complexity of Securitization Mortgages and Mortgage-backed Securities Are Complex and Difficult to Value Complexity of Default vs Prepay Risk Additional Complexity in MBS Deep Tranching Unique Securities Examples

    19. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 19 The Complexity of Securitization Mortgages and Mortgage-backed Securities Are Complex and Difficult to Value Complexity of Default vs Prepay Risk Additional Complexity in MBS Deep Tranching Unique Securities Examples

    20. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 20 Figure 9: Examples of Actual MBS Funding Structures

    21. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 21 The Complexity of Securitization Point: Mortgages are complex and difficult to value, and MBS are built upon that complexity. Fundamental changes to underwriting and servicing standards are not easily identifiable in the inherent complexity of mortgages and MBS, posing risk to mortgage funding.

    22. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 22 CDOs Add Complexity to MBS and Other Constituent Credit Instruments Complexity of CDO Structures Growth of the CDO Market

    23. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 23 Figure 10: Basic CDO Security Structure

    24. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 24 Figure 11: Typical Tranche Sizes and Coupon Rates

    25. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 25 Key Differences between MBS and CDOs CDO pools are actively managed. CDO transactions close before the pool of underlying assets is fully formed. CDOs are heterogeneous with respect to granularity. CDOs illustrate more ratings volatility than ABS or MBS. CDO collateral heterogeneity increases opacity. Secondary market trading (liquidity) is limited.

    26. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 26 Figure 12: Examples of Actual CDO Funding Structures

    27. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 27 CDOs Add Complexity to MBS and Other Constituent Credit Instruments Complexity of CDO Structures Growth of the CDO Market

    28. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 28 Figure 13: Annual Cash CDO Issuance

    29. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 29 Fast Growth: Lessons from 1999-2003 The CDO market is opportunistic in the way it drops collateral types that are out of favor with investors and picks up collateral types that are in favor with investors. The best example of this is the switch out of poor-performing high-yield bonds and into well-performing high yield loans between 2001 and 2003. Also, certain types of ABS present in SF CDOs from 1999 through 2001 disappeared from later vintages: manufactured housing loans, aircraft leases, franchise business loans, and 12b-1 mutual fund fees. All of these assets had horrible performance in older SF CDOs. In their place, SF CDOs have recently focused more on RMBS and CMBS. (Lucas, Goodman and Fabozzi 2006, at 5).

    30. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 30 The Link from Mortgages to Mortgage-Backed Securities to Collateralized Debt Obligations CDO rating changes follow other ratings changes. An extremely high proportion of current CDO collateral is MBS. 1999-2003 redux?

    31. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 31 Figure 14: Number of CDO, RMBS, and ABS Ratings Changes, Three-month MA

    32. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 32 The Link from Mortgages to Mortgage-Backed Securities to Collateralized Debt Obligations CDO rating changes follow other ratings changes. An extremely high proportion of current CDO collateral is MBS. 1999-2003 redux?

    33. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 33 How much and what kind of MBS are in CDOs? The FDIC reports that 81 percent of the $249 billion of CDO collateral pools issued in 2005, or $200 billion, was made up of residential mortgage products. (FDIC Outlook, Fall 2006)

    34. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 34 How much and what kind of MBS are in CDOs? The FDIC reports that 81 percent of the $249 billion of CDO collateral pools issued in 2005, or $200 billion, was made up of residential mortgage products. (FDIC Outlook, Fall 2006) Moodys reports that among RMBS, 70%-75% below AAA-rated

    35. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 35 How much and what kind of MBS are in CDOs? The FDIC reports that 81 percent of the $249 billion of CDO collateral pools issued in 2005, or $200 billion, was made up of residential mortgage products. (FDIC Outlook, Fall 2006) Moodys reports that among RMBS in CDOs, 70%-75% below AAA-rated. (Moodys CDO Asset Exposure Report, October 2006) $200 billion of RMBS in CDOs x 70% below AAA = $140 billion of lower-tranche RMBS in CDOs

    36. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 36 How much and what kind of MBS are in CDOs? The FDIC reports that 81 percent of the $249 billion of CDO collateral pools issued in 2005, or $200 billion, was made up of residential mortgage products. (FDIC Outlook, Fall 2006) Moodys reports that among RMBS in CDOs, 70%-75% below AAA-rated. (Moodys CDO Asset Exposure Report, October 2006) $200 billion of RMBS in CDOs x 70% below AAA = $140 billion of lower-tranche RMBS in CDOs SIFMA puts total RMBS issued in 2005 at $1,326 billion.

    37. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 37 How much and what kind of MBS are in CDOs? The FDIC reports that 81 percent of the $249 billion of CDO collateral pools issued in 2005, or $200 billion, was made up of residential mortgage products. (FDIC Outlook, Fall 2006) Moodys reports that among RMBS in CDOs, 70%-75% below AAA-rated. (Moodys CDO Asset Exposure Report, October 2006) $200 billion of RMBS in CDOs x 70% below AAA = $140 billion of lower-tranche RMBS in CDOs SIFMA puts total RMBS issued in 2005 at $1,326 billion. Assuming 90% AAA in all 2005 RMBS, that leaves a total of $133 billion in lower-tranche RMBS issued in 2005

    38. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 38 The Link from Mortgages to Mortgage-Backed Securities to Collateralized Debt Obligations CDO rating changes follow other ratings changes. An extremely high proportion of current CDO collateral is MBS. 1999-2003 redux?

    39. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 39 1999-2003 Redux (but with MBS)? Point: CDOs are buying a lot of lower-tranche RMBS Point Point: The 10% of lower-tranche RMBS provide crucial credit support for the 90% of AAA securities. If you cant sell the 10%, cant sell the other 90%! Point Point Point: If CDOs exit RMBS as they did with other collateral after 1999-2003, that will leave a substantial hole in the market for crucial lower-tranche RMBS.

    40. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 40 Table 5: CDO Risk Premiums and Credit Spreads and Macroeconomic Performance

    41. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 41 Figure 16: CDO Issuance and U.S. Home Equity ABS Indices

    42. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 42 Overview of Public Policy Implications: Information Problems across Financial Markets and Institutions

    43. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 43 Policy Implications Transparency Stability Continued Innovation

    44. Criterion Economics L.L.C. 44 Policy Implications MBS Pioneer Lewis S. Ranieri, in an interview published in the American Banker last June, said: "When you start divorcing the creator of the risk from the ultimate holder of the risk, it becomes an issue of, 'Does the ultimate holder truly understand the nature of the risk that you've redistributed?' " Mr. Ranieri said. "By cutting it up in so many ways or complicating it by so many levels, do you still have clarity ... on the nature of the underlying risk?" "It's not clear that we haven't gone, in some ways, too far -- that we have not gone beyond the ability to have true transparency," he said. "That is a fair question many of us in the business and people in the regulatory regime are wrestling with."

More Related