Finding Big Lessons in Small Places MPA/ID 10 th Anniversary, May 15, 2010. “Mauritius: A Success Story” Jeffrey Frankel. NBER Project on African Successes. Thanks to Ali Mansoor, Oyebola Olabisi, Diva Singh and Cristobal Marshall.
MPA/ID 10th Anniversary, May 15, 2010“Mauritius: A Success Story”Jeffrey Frankel
NBER Project on African Successes
Thanks to Ali Mansoor, Oyebola Olabisi, Diva Singh and Cristobal Marshall
Economic Success economic successSource: Ali Mansoor, Ministry of Finance & Ec. Empowerment, Mauritius
* Assumes GDP Growth and
Inflation of 5% per annum
“Where economic success
But textile & apparel success depended on preferential treatment from US & EU.
Successful, economic successin Africa
São Tomé & Príncipe
Another famous success
Unsuccessful, in Africa
Another less successful ocean economy, originally based on sugar, & majority now ethnic Indian
FijiWhat do the successful island economies have in common?
Clue: In each of these successes, island was uninhabited. 100% of the population came from somewhere else.
Determinant of growth: countries
Popular Instrumental Variable:
Acemoglu, et al
Climatological pre-disposition to malaria
SachsGrowth literature has recognized the need to correct for endogeneity, via IV
Based on Rodrik, Subramanian, & Trebbi (2003)
Whether through luck or skill, throughout its history, countries Mauritius has been able to adapt to changed circumstances:(1) 19th century(2) At independence, 1968 (3) Adverse trade shocks, 2004-09
Island passed to UK (1810) => Abolition of slavery (1835-39)
Labor shortage on the new sugar plantations
Mauritius adapts to changed circumstances countries(3) “When we came to power in 2005, the situation was awful”-- Rama Sithanen, Fin.Min.(Labor Party),FT
Compagnie Mauricienne de Textiles countriesis fully integrated, from raw cotton to finished garments
Compagnie Mauricienne de Textiles countries.has adopted current technology from Asia
CMT. The textile plant is automated. countries
Lands endowed with extractive industries & plantation crops (oil, mining, sugar, cotton…)developed bad institutions: slavery, inequality, dictatorship, & state control,
whereas those suited to fishing & small farms developed institutions based on individualism, egalitarianism, democracy, & capitalism.
When the industrial revolution came along, the latter areas were well-suited to make the most of it.
Those that had specialized in extractive industries were not,
because society had come to depend on class structure,
rather than on individual incentive.
Research agenda countries
I have not yet finished my investigations.
So I do not yet have final conclusions.
Visit to Mauritius (January 2009)
Literature review (largely complete)
Econometrics of performance across African countries (only started).Appendices Mauritius: African success story
Today, Mauritius is not predominantly a commodity economy;
but it was, before independence…
When Mauritius was a sugar economy,
it suffered from periodic Dutch Disease cycles --
due, not just to swings in world price or domestic output,
but rather to big changes in rich-country barriers:
1830s, 1919-20, & 1973-74
One branch of the Natural Resource Curse emphasizesthat certain commodities endowments originally give rise to bad institutions, which later impede industrialization.
Correlations between government spending & GDP countriesG has been pro-cyclical for most developing countries:rises in booms, falls in recessions; esp. commodity-exporters
Source: Kaminsky, Reinhart, and Vegh (2004)
E.g., in Mauritius, sugar booms of 1830s, 1919-20, & 1973-74 produced Dutch Disease:rise in public spending “of dubious economic value”V.d.Ancharaz. p.5 => Deficits, inflation, real appreciation.
Regardless, the important questions are:
How did Mauritius achieve its success?
Are there lessons for other countries?
Ancharaz, Vinaye dey, “The effect of trade liberalization on export-oriented output and FDI: A case study of the Mauritian EPZ, 1971-1998,” University of Mauritius, Réduit, 2004.
Amitav Ghosh, A Sea of Poppies, 2008.
Patrik Iman and Cameila Manoiu, “Mauritius: A competitiveness assessment,” IMF working paper, Sept. 2008
Dani Rodrik, “Trade Policy and Economic Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa,”Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, 1997.
Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, & Francesco Trebbi, 2003, “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development,” Journal of Economic Growth.
Paul Romer, “Two Strategies for Economic Development: Using Ideas and Producing Ideas,” ABCDE, World Bank, 1992.
Jeffrey Sachs, 2003, “Institutions Don’t Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income,” NBER WP 9490.
Jeffrey Sachs & Andrew Warner, 1997, “Sources of Slow Growth in African Economies,” Journal of African Economies.
Arvind Subramanian, “The Mauritian Success Story & Its Lessons,” 2007
Arvind Subramanian & Roy Devesh, “Who can Explain the Mauritian Miracle: Meade, Romer, Sachs, or Rodrik?”in Rodrik, ed., In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth, Princeton U. Press, 2003.
“Cocoa in Ghana,” MIT, 1974.
“Trade & Growth: Cause & Effect?” with D. Romer, AER 1999.
“National Institutions & the Role of the IMF,” IMF Staff Papers, 2003.
“On the Rand: Determinants of the South African Exchange Rate,” South African Journal of Economics, 2007.
With B.Smit & F.Sturzenegger, CID South Africa project, Economics of Transition, 2008.
"Fiscal & Monetary Policy in a Commodity Based Economy“
“Macroeconomic Challenges after a Decade of Success”
“The Natural Resource Curse,”May 2010.