1 / 28

Large Group Ranker Training

blueprint 2.0 Making homelessness rare, short-lived and recoverable. Large Group Ranker Training Indianapolis CoC Program Application & Technical Assistance Committee. CoC Program Application & Technical Assistance Committee. Erica Aquila City of Indianapolis Janna Bruce CHIP

leyna
Download Presentation

Large Group Ranker Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. blueprint 2.0 Making homelessness rare, short-lived and recoverable. Large Group Ranker Training Indianapolis CoC Program Application & Technical Assistance Committee

  2. CoC Program Application & Technical Assistance Committee Erica Aquila City of Indianapolis Janna Bruce CHIP Julie Fidler City of Indianapolis Adam Hutton Volunteers of America Mary Jones United Way of Central Indiana Greg Martz GM Development Jim McElhinney FPGI/IHN Patrick Monahan IUPUI Amy Nelson Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana Christy Shepard CHIP Bob Weiler IU School of Social Work

  3. Purpose of HUD Continuum of Care Funding Promote communitywide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness. Provide funding to quickly re-house homeless individuals and families (while minimizing the trauma and dislocation caused to homeless individuals & families) Promote access to and effective utilization of mainstream programs by homeless individuals and families Optimize self-sufficiency among individuals and families experiencing homelessness

  4. New Project Funding Process Three Step Process 1. Must meet threshold criteria: • Nonprofit Organization or Government • HUD eligible activities, including Match • Alignment with BP 2.0 • Demonstrate need through research data • Alignment with CoC and NOFA • Complete Application by June 2, 2014 • Make presentation in Large Group Scoring/Community Review Process • Emphasis on Housing for new projects

  5. Renewal Project Funding Process Four Step Process Submit a letter of intent form to apply by June 2, 2014 Must meet threshold criteria Data will be pulled from agency APR by HMIS lead and scored according to pre-approved APR Rubric Make presentation in Large Group Scoring/Community Review Process

  6. What is the CoC’s Application Scored on Nationally? • CoC Housing, Services, and Structure • Leverage • Homeless Needs and Data Collection • HMIS • CoC Strategic Planning • Blueprint, etc. • CoC Performance • OutcomesMatter! A Lot!

  7. 2014 Local Scoring Overview Purpose of Large Group Scoring (LGS) Process: • Determine LOCAL prioritization of programs for inclusion in Consolidated CoC Application. APR Rubric + LGS = Final Priority List

  8. 2014 Local Scoring Overview • Two categories of projects • New Projects • Renewal Projects • 115 available APR Rubric points (Renewals Only) • Housing Measure • Income Measure • Employment Measure • Homeless Families Served • Chronic Homeless Served • Mainstream Benefits (TANF, Medicaid, Medicare, etc) • Draw Down Rate

  9. CoC Program Types • Permanent Housing • Permanent Supportive Housing • Transitional Housing • Services Only Programs • SSO HOME

  10. Housing Outcomes Permanent Supportive Housing • % staying in or exiting to permanent housing Transitional Housing • % exiting to permanent housing Services Only • % exiting to permanent housing

  11. Income Outcomes Permanent Supportive Housing • % maintaining or increasing income from all sources Transitional Housing • % increasing income from all sources Services Only • % increasing income from all sources

  12. Employment Outcomes Permanent Supportive Housing • % maintaining or increasing employment income Transitional Housing • % increasing employment income Services Only • % increasing employment income

  13. Mainstream Benefit % of households receiving mainstream benefits at exit

  14. Chronic Homelessness and Homeless Families % of households served who are considered chronically homeless (HUD definition) % of households served who are homeless families

  15. Draw Down Rates % of draw down against project budget as reported on previous APRs submitted to Grant Manager

  16. The Ranking Process All attendees receive Note Sheets for each program presenting.

  17. The Ranking Process • Presenters will have 5 minutes to present on program. • Attendees will be able to ask each presenter questions (5 minute limit for ALL questions). • Attendees will make notes on the notes sheets for each program presented. These are not shared. • Attendees will put personal note sheets in order of personal priority. • Attendees order personal priority to final Ranking Sheet. This is shared.

  18. The Ranking Process Upon completion of all presentations, attendees will be required to complete final ranking sheet. Remember, this final Ranking Sheet is shared.

  19. Ranking ExerciseProvide Copies of final Ranking Sheet

  20. Final Priority List • The total number of projects ranked by each person will be counted (must be at least 2/3 of all projects to rank). • For all qualifying rankings, the total number of projects overall will then be divided by the result from #1. That will give a fraction greater than or equal to 1. • The fraction from #2 will then be multiplied by each rank to determine the final rank for each project.

  21. Final Priority List Example: There are 30 total projects proposed.   • Rater A is able to rank 25 of them without conflict.   • Rater A's multiplier is 30/25 = 1.2 • Rater A's top ranked program gets a final rank of 1 x 1.2 = 1.2   • A's 13th ranked program gets a final rank of 13 x 1.2 = 15.6 • Rater A's 25th ranked program gets a final rank of 25 x 1.2 = 30 To determine overall LGS Rank, these final ranks will be averaged across all qualifying raters

  22. Final Priority List APR Rubric + Final LGS Rank = Final Priority List for Application

  23. Important Things Project information will be available on our website (indycoc.org) YOU MUSTreview all project information PRIOR to LGS! Will be posted by June 9, 2014. APR Rubric will be posted by June 16, 2014 Bring copies of the information to LGS—no copies will be available at LGS!! LGS Day is June 26, 2014.

  24. Important Things You cannot rank a project if: • You work for the agency making the request • Your agency directly benefits from the project (i.e. your agency has staff paid by grant) • You are on the board of the requesting agency • You serve on the CoC Program Application & Technical Assistance Committee

  25. Important Things • LGS begins at 9:00am and ends at 5:00pm, please commit to attending the entire day! • You must be able to rank at least 2/3 of the projects in order to rank any projects

  26. Questions??

  27. Do you have specific program or agency questions? Please go indycoc.org to review information available or email info@indycoc.org with any questions

More Related