Loading in 5 sec....

“Education is what remains after you forget what you learned.” PowerPoint Presentation

“Education is what remains after you forget what you learned.”

- 114 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' “Education is what remains after you forget what you learned.” ' - lester-shaw

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### Spectroscopy of Macromolecules

“Education is what remains after you forget what you learned.”

Unknown NMMI instructor, ca. 1974.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr2rDclJeaU

Who is he?

“Rule #54. Avoid virgins. They’re too clingy.”

--Wedding Crashers (2005)

Danger: this is “what you need to know.” One could easily spend a whole semester on this alone.

For chemistry in general, spectroscopy is more often applied than, say, scattering, but…many other courses teach it better.

Focus on these three:

1. Fluorescence

2. Circular Dichroism/ORD

3. NMR

Reference: VanHolde (newer edition, “Physical Biochemistry” but the older editions are special, if you can still get them)

Spectroscopy ↔ Quantum Mechanics easily spend a whole semester on this alone.

A Postulate View of Quantum Mechanics

- A system (e.g. molecule) of n particles (electrons, nuclei) is described by wavefunctions (q1,q2…q3n,t) that describe locations (q1,q2,q3) of each particle at time t.
- The probability of finding the system in the differential volume element d3V at time t is the squared complex modulus of the wave functions:
*d3q

Hermitian? easily spend a whole semester on this alone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian_matrix

- The operators for position, momentum, time and energy easily spend a whole semester on this alone.
- are as shown in this table.

Position and time pass through unchanged;

momentum and energy are filtered through the calculus.

Time-dependent Schrodinger’s Eqn.

The Hamiltonian operator H follows from a classical mechanics system worked out by Hamilton, where the classical operator was

H = K + U, the sum of kinetic and potential energies. This equation ties the action of the energy operator to how the wave function responds. Compare this to Fick’s 2nd law: Dd2c/dx2 = -dc/dt. Like concentration, a wavefunction describes where something is.

Why Quantum Mechanics is Hard equation:

Because we don’t study enough classical mechanics.

Debye is said to have seen very little new in Quantum Mechanics; at least, the math is common to other stuff…if you have studied enough other stuff…which hardly any of us do!

So far, we have seen that expectation values are similar to other averages we have computed: sum of probability times thing, divided by sum of probabilities to normalize. The wave function “sandwich” is new…and often associated with a particularly simple matrix mathematics.

We also see that Schrodinger’s equation resembles Fick’s equation….which in turn resembles the heat flow equation all engineers learn.

Eigenfunctions may permit us to replace calculus with multiplication.

Basis sets let us create functions by summation of other functions.

It sometimes works out that a set of eigenfunctions can be used to represent other functions. We say the desired function can be expanded in the set of eigenfunctions. Compare this to writing a vector in terms of unit vectors.

Eigenfunctions are most useful when they are orthogonal and complete, meaning that they do not project on to one another and are sufficient to express arbitrary functions (again, compare the traditional unit vectors). Hermitian operators satisfy this.

A simple example of an operator: kinetic energy only functions.

Classically, kinetic energy is Ek=mv2/2 = p2/2m since p = mv. Check the table of Postulate 5 to get the QM analogue:

The operator is discussed in the Math Tuneup, as is its “square”, 2, the Laplacian.

Time may not matter. functions.

Often, the time-dependence of (q,t) is particularly boring; it might just be an oscillation that can be factored out from the positional, q-dependent part.

This case is appropriate for stationary operators—ones with no time dependence. If you put the above equation into the full, time-dependent Schrodinger’s equation of Postulate 6, you get (see VanHolde—it is very easy) the simpler, time-independent Shrodinger’s equation, which is an Eigenequation with the particularly interesting and useful Eigenvalue, E.

H-sigh equals E-sigh. Another equation for permanent memory storage.

Van Holde treats all the usual simple systems. functions.

These notes derive from a modern VanHolde (VanHolde, Johnson & Ho). The authors march through systems you probably saw in PChem already, such as:

- Free particle
- Particle in box
- Hydrogen atom
- Approximate solutions (perturbation)
- Small molecules (LCAO)
In time, I hope this presentation will grow to cover some of those subjects, at least briefly. Meanwhile, I hope the foregoing made QM seem less weird.

For now, we need a leap of reasonableness.

Leap of Reasonableness functions.

QM is the explanation of things we know about atoms, going all the way back to Dalton’s Law of Multiple Proportions.

QM explains why it’s CH4, not C1.251H3.785

It’s those stupid waves; together with boundary conditions (like the electron has to be somewhere) they give constructive & destructive interferences—nodes—which makes Chemistry an integer science.

Think laser cavity, think wave trough, think booming bass at some positions in a room.

For particle existence to be tied to wave amplitude is tantamount to saying: there are discrete energy levels associated with standing waves.

U functions.

E = h

r

- Example: nearly harmonic vibration potential.
- Weird quantum-mechanical things:
- There is a zero-point energy.
- Discrete states are separated by near multiples of the zero point energy.
- More energy = more nodes in the wave function = fancier dancing by
- the electrons.
- If we consider an energy diagram for electronic energy levels, not vibrational levels, that fancier dancing corresponds to more complex orbitals—e.g.,
- complicated f orbitals instead of simpler s orbitals.

QM is useful to describe functions.transitions between atomic or molecular energy states.

- Beer-Lambert Law (see Van Holde)
- Einstein-Planck Coefficients (to be added; meanwhile, I could weep, these authors make it so simple).
- Transition dipole
- Orientation of transition dipole

}Let’s do these for now

Absorption vs. Scattering functions.

- Earlier, we talked about how light grabs electrons and shakes them to produce scattering. We used the analogy of a boat floating on rough seas; it produces a little ripple as it bobs up and down.
- Molecules that absorb light do the grabbing instead. This stronger interaction is more like the water going over Niagara Falls.

Operators project. functions.(this is a sentence, not a government program)

Van Holde (Ch.8, p 373 et seq.) shows that a transition from one quantum state to another (absorption, emission) occurs when:

1) E = h

2) the transition dipole fi is finite and makes a strong projection on the electric field.

Transition strength

Transition! functions.

Think of the initial state as rolling along the runway. The wings catch some air and—voila!—transition to vertical acceleration. In this case, the initial and final vectors (oops, wavefunctions) are pictured as orthogonal. In QM transitions, this may or may not be allowed.

The main thing is: the transition operator (wings) somehow couples one state (horizontal motion) into another (vertical motion).

Selection rules: will it fly? wings catch some air and—voila!—transition to vertical acceleration. In this case, the initial and final vectors (oops, wavefunctions) are pictured as orthogonal. In QM transitions, this may or may not be allowed.

Quantum mechanical transitions depend on:

- how the transition dipole aligns to the electric field
- obscure rules regarding how the field being operated on (initial wavefunction) relates to the new field (final wavefunction). Some transitions are “forbidden”—meaning they happen infrequently.

It matters wings catch some air and—voila!—transition to vertical acceleration. In this case, the initial and final vectors (oops, wavefunctions) are pictured as orthogonal. In QM transitions, this may or may not be allowed.

VanHolde Fig. 8.15

UV absorption of crystalline methylthymine

Franck-Condon Principle, Jablonski Diagram wings catch some air and—voila!—transition to vertical acceleration. In this case, the initial and final vectors (oops, wavefunctions) are pictured as orthogonal. In QM transitions, this may or may not be allowed.

1st excited state

absorption

U

emission

Ground state

Evib = h

r

But it’s not that simple wings catch some air and—voila!—transition to vertical acceleration. In this case, the initial and final vectors (oops, wavefunctions) are pictured as orthogonal. In QM transitions, this may or may not be allowed.

Opposing electron spins: singlet (ground state shown)

Aligned electron spins: triplet (excited state shown)

ENERGY-TIMING DIAGRAM FOR ABSORPTION, FLUORESCENCE & PHOSPHORESCENCE

2nd singlet

Internal conversion ~10-12 s

Absorption ~10-15 s

1st singlet

Intersystem

crossing ~10-8 s

E

1st triplet

Fluorescence,

instantaneous

after ~10-8 s delay

Phosphorescence,

instantaneous after delay

of 0.0001 to 100 s

Nonradiative

Ground State

VanHolde Fig 11.2 shows more detail, if you want it.

Fluorescence solvent effects PHOSPHORESCENCE

Example: is that protein aggregating?

Put a hydrophobic probe in (pyrene?) and see if it “lights up” to indicate aggregation across the hydrophobic patch.

Example: is that arborol self-assembling?

Same solution to similar problem as above.

+

Fluorescence effects not always a tool, sometimes a nuisance.

For FPR, the dye can get quenched and not undergo photobleaching.

This can happen as a result of variables like pH or salt.

Dye can self-quench if too concentrated.

That is again a tool: calcein leakage test for vesicles.

Fluorescence Machines Can be Simple nuisance.

Turner fluorometer, filter design. This is just an LS machine with filters.

filters

filters

Detector

Remember our timing diagram….Unlike light scattering, fluorescence is not instantaneous.

It is a little bit more like somehow preparing radioactive elements: excited molecules spontaneously decide they have had enough of life in the fast lane and return to their ground state. Some tolerate the excited state longer than others.

Scattering

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUK9lG-7HTc&feature=related

Fluorescence/

Phosphorescence

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SqJz0NgnnE&feature=related

N fluorescence is not instantaneous.

t

Fluorescence Decay: yet another exponential for us to learn.later

at first

Define: N = number of molecules in the excited state.

The number dN decaying back to ground state is proportional to the number available in the excited state.

The number N is reported by the proportionate number dN that emit light.

Fluorescence decay instruments are much more complex beasts. fluorescence is not instantaneous.

Measure lifetimes to:

probe environmental conditions (viscosity, pH, hydrophobicity)

Infer size, shape of molecules

Infer distance between different parts of molecule.

“Decompose” fluorescence spectra

by components (when spectral features

overlap, time can separate them)

http://www.jobinyvon.com/SiteResources/Data/MediaArchive/files/Fluorescence/applications/F-10.pdf

Quantum yield indicates environment. fluorescence is not instantaneous.

The minimum rate of decay would be the Einstein A value for spontaneous emission, which can be calculated from spectral width (VanHolde Eq. 8.102)

The actual decay rate is higher, due to internal conversion, intersystem crossing, nonradiative transfer and any stimulated emission processes from interactions with stray photons.

Quantum yield is defined as: q = A/k

It is a sensitive indicator of the environment of the dye; q often increases when a dye binds to a molecule. Free dye may be quenched (see previous slides).

I fluorescence is not instantaneous.

absorbed

emitted

l

Another way to think of quantum yield: ratio of (visible) photons in to photons out.Some dyes are very efficient light converters, with quantum yields approaching 100%.

Fluorescein (which we often use in FPR) is so efficient that it is hard to know how efficient it is. About 90%-100% has been reported.

High efficiency is a good thing for FPR: efficient light conversion means little heat production, less damage.

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer—There’s nothing to FRET about.

The emitting group does not have to be the same as the absorbing group.

Donor

Donor

hn

Acceptor

Acceptor

Donor

Donor

+

+

Acceptor

Acceptor

+

hn

I to FRET about.

Donor F

Acceptor A

l

Absorbing is easy; transfer grows more difficult with distance.Physics problem: Requires transition dipole interaction between donor and acceptor. Dipole-dipole interactions go like r6.

Ro = 6 – 45 Å depending on the DA chemistry and solvent. See VanHolde Table 11.1 for examples.

Chemistry problem: Donor’s F-spectrum must significantly overlap acceptor’s A-spectrum.

Typical D-A pairs are easily found from the old Molecular Probes site (now Invitrogen).

http://www.probes.invitrogen.com

http://probes.invitrogen.com/handbook/boxes/0422.html (this link gives several D-A pairs & Forster radius.

Tetramethylrhodamine

(methyl ester), perchlorate)

Fluorescein

Look up other pairs.

Are donors usually

smaller than acceptors???

D-A is a valuable tool for estimating inter- or intramolecular distances.

A

r

D

???Does labeling a molecule (twice!) change it? Maybe.

Cyclic AMP (adenosine monophosphate) intramolecular distances.

- C-AMP-dependent protein kinase
- 2 regulatory subunits
- 2 catalytic subunits

C-AMP dissociates protein kinase intramolecular distances.

This is followed by labeling fluorescein to the catalytic subunit & rhodamine to the regulatory subunit. When kinase is in compact form, the fluorescein fluorescence is donated to the rhodamine acceptor. When C-AMP opens the structure up, fluorescein fluorescence grows.

Polarization of fluorescence can be used to measure a new transport property, rotational diffusion.

Light scattering is instantaneous, so draw a donut around the induced dipole and that’s what radiation pattern you will get.

Fluorescence and, especially, phosphorescence are slower and the molecule may rotate, taking the (emission) dipole with it, before emission. Draw a donut around the dipole at the time of emission.

g transport property, rotational diffusion.is in a molecular frame of

Reference; this is not the rotation of the molecule but the different transition dipole of emission and absorption; for example, the molecule might distort a bit on absorption, so emission would be in some new direction.

Absorption transition dipole

Emission transition dipole

g

Vertical incident light

f

III

I

detector

If molecule did not rotate (subscript zero)….. transport property, rotational diffusion.

You can measure g by

freezing out the motion—e.g.,put the molecule in some viscous solvent, cool it, etc.

If the molecule does rotate… transport property, rotational diffusion.

Then r will deviate from ro, tending more towards zero. (If ro was positive, r goes down).

You can use this to estimate rotational diffusion coefficients, or at least to track how they are changing due to binding, adhesion or aggregation.

Problem: it’s the rotation of the fluorphore, not necessarily the whole molecule.

According to VanHolde, fluorometry is the only spectroscopic method that senses changes in molecular weight (e.g., due to aggregation).

What do you think of that assertion?

This is called steady state fluorescence polarization anisotropy.

In this equation, t is the fluorescence decay time and r is a rotational correlation time (proportional to the inverse of rotational diffusion coefficient).

You may recall that Dr = kT/8phR3 from our discussion of Hv DLS.

So this means that 1/Dr or r represent volume.

Perrin plot: anisotropy.r-1 vs T

How would you use this?

From intercept, get ro, which is related to g.

Use slope to estimate t/V.

If t is known from fluorescence decay (or maybe even literature) then obtain V.

Plot not straight?

Could be nonspherical shape, proteins changing with temperature (denaturing), binding to stuff as a function of temperature, etc.

T/h

r(t) anisotropy.

t

The well-heeled & talented can do pulsed, polarized fluorescence…A recent (and unusual, I think) application of this is to early detection of cancer:

http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-47-13-2281

Van Holde Fig. 11.20 anisotropy.

Everything you ever wanted to know about Fluorescence but were afraid to ask.

Lakowicz: Principles of Fluorescence

http://cfs.umbi.umd.edu/jrl/index.html

“Mostly drudgery.”

A source of fluorphores: probes.invitrogen.com (worth linking again)

Circular Dichroism were afraid to ask.

- Chapter 10 stuff from VanHolde.
- Theme of it: molecular birefringence.

Plane-polarized light can be thought of as two counter-rotating circularly polarized beams.

Circular dichroism, the selective absorption of left or right-circularly polarized light, is used to characterize chirality.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_dichroism

http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/PPS2/course/section8/ss_960531_AFrame_62.gif

If the solvent absorbs heavily in the UV, CD is probably not possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

Have you seen this before?

NMR Spectroscopy possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

You could have a whole lifetime in NMR!

The main application is to molecular fingerprinting: NMR is the primary tool that lets chemists know they have the right structure.

Increasingly, it competes with X-ray diffraction for structural characterization.

We will do just enough to introduce the variations that tell us something about polymer dynamics.

This can be internal dynamics of bonds or, intriguingly, diffusion in complex systems.

Ref: Van Holde, Ch. 12 and articles containing the word, DOSY

Crystallography could not do this. possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

R. Tycko, Biochemistry 2003, 42 (11), 3151.

NMR is about nuclear spin flips possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

Spin quantum numbers are multiples of ½. For protons, the choices are + ½ and –½ . We may just call this + and -.

+1/2

-1/2

How do we know? Because we can see energy get absorbed to change the spins, but only when a magnetic field is applied. The phenomenon is obviously in the quantum domain, but it is reminiscent of classical spin of a charge, which generates a magnetic dipole.

+1/2 possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

-1/2

No energy difference without H. The bigger H, the bigger E and the faster spin gyrates.H

-1/2

E

0

H

+1/2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVKz9G3YXiw possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

Nuclear spins in a magnetic field can be compared to actual spin in a gravitational field.

Play with gyroscope: if we want to deflect its motion, what is the right stimulus?

NMR = Low-energy spectroscopy possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

Today’s biggest NMR is about 900 MHz

The energies associated with nuclear spin flips (from + to -) are much less than the thermal energy, kT: E+ - E- 0. This is true even in high magnetic fields

Unlike vibrational & electronic spectroscopy, most molecules are not in the ground state. In fact, only a tiny excess of molecules is in the ground state.

Net magnetization of possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD). lots of spins

H

+1/2 low energy

The condition

-1/2 high energy

M = net magetization

There is no coherence among spins; they just rotate in random phase.

If you count very carefully, you’ll see there are more low-E spins than high-E spins.

Note: there is a good chance the signs are backwards—who cares?

The slight excess of low-E spins sums to produce a net magnetization (heavy arrow). Because there are lots of spins, randomly phased, this heavy arrow really sums up parallel to the z-axis.

R.F. generator possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

e.g. 30 MHz

To receiver

Big, permanent magnet

Sample in NMR tube ~0.5 mL

Hx

Hy

Bugger

magnet

Old-time continuous wave NMR spectrometersswept field because sweeping R.F. is hard to do.Hz

- This stimulates signal Hx detected by receiver coil.
- Sweep bugger magnet to scan for resonance of nuclei in different environments (scan about 10 ppm for protons).

- Imagine we turn off R.F.
- Inside the cell, spins precess;
- random phase, so M points along z.
- Apply coherent R.F. (Hy) Now M inverted & coherent & it precesses (heavy blue arrow).

If NMR were still like this… possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

It would still be the most important weapon in the chemist’s arsenal.

Even at low magnetic fields, the “fingerprinting” of simple molecules is easily achieved.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerprint

Modern Fourier Transform NMR is even better. possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

Very strong superconducting magnets.

The magnet is not swept, but sometimes spatial gradients in field are arranged.

“White light” excitation through RF pulses excites all nuclei at once.

Relaxation experiments not different in basic concept from fluorescence.

Imaging possible; changes in “image” can be related to diffusion.

What is the Fourier Transform of “Ping”? possible. Then we use spectropolarimetry, a.k.a. Optical Rotatory Dispersion (ORD).

I

A short pulse corresponds to a region of nearly constant intensity.

t

I

Just one example of inverse relationships. Here’s another: in optics, if you want to image a tiny spot in a microscope, you need to gather scattered light off of it through a very wide angle objective (high numerical aperture or low “f number”).

w

Actual pulses are short-duration signals oscillating near the Larmor frequency, no

I

I

t

no

w

F.T.

t

no

2/t

- ~ 10 msec
no ~ 200 MHz

tno = # of oscillations = 2000

What would the I(w) spectrum look like if the number of oscillations were 106?

We need a bit more about how it works. the Larmor frequency,

Pulses are delivered along the x-direction.

It’s a coherent pulse, with the energy and duration designed to bring half the spins in the ground state into the excited state: no net magnetization along z axis.

It does this with phase coherence, so M rotates in the the x-y plane.

A coil in the x-direction can sense (“acquire”) the oscillating projection of M onto that direction.

These pulses, and the subsequent acquisition are much faster than sweeping the field as in a CW instrument. For almost all applications, FT-NMR has taken over.

z

z

Pulse

y

x

y

x

Detection Merry-go-round. the Larmor frequency,

Kids have to hang arm-to-arm so the last one can ring bell.

Maybe they even hold hands so someone can reach out to do it!

.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjqBsan9De8

Relax—the nuclei do! the Larmor frequency,

Over time, some of the spins in the high-energy state fall back to the low energy state. This enthalpic process happens over a characteristic time, T1. If no one is on the merry-go-round, the bell never rings.

Over another time, kids get sick of cooperating. They lose phase. Although a given group (say, those wearing red shirts) goes around as often as they ever did, they can no longer reach out and touch the bell. This entropic dephasing time is called T2.

z the Larmor frequency,

z

y

x

y

x

T1 and T2 are the main physical decay terms.- Spins return to
- ground state
- Enthalpic

z

z

T1

“spin-lattice relaxation”

y

x

y

x

- Spins dephase
- Entropic

T2

“spin-spin relaxation”

FID = Free Induction Decay the Larmor frequency, Why again do they oscillate? Why again do they decay?

FID for one nucleus.

FID for two nuclei (very different frequencies).

You have to FT your FID. the Larmor frequency,

Frequencies of oscillation give NMR frequencies.

You get strengths at those frequencies, too!

Rapidity of decay controls width of peaks.

An efficient algorithm for doing this was invented ca. 1950 by Cooley-Tukey and is called Fast Fourier Transformation.

“Window” functions should be applied to limit the effects of sudden start/stop of acquired dta.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooley%E2%80%93Tukey_FFT_algorithm)

Pulse terminology is easiest in the rotating frame: the Larmor frequency, as you spin at the Larmor frequency, look up, out or down.

The pulse that was used to bring half the ground state spins into the excited state, resulting in coherent oscillation of M in the x-y plane is called a 90o pulse.

z

z

90o Pulse

y

x

y

x

180 the Larmor frequency, o Pulse

A longer and/or more energetic pulse will take the excess of protons in the ground state and create a similar excess in the excited state.

z

z

180o Pulse

y

x

y

x

I the Larmor frequency, o

Imax

Imax /e

t

T1

Measuring T1: Inversion Recovery Pulse Sequence*180

90

Io

t

t

FT

w

Spins are dunked upside-down, given a time, t,to right themselves by spin-lattice relaxation. Some spin-spin occurs, too, but doesn’t matter because spins are refocused with the 90o pulse and measured. The signal depends on the time,t.

Waterfall plot: you actually see something like this for all of the peaks in the spectrum.

t

*Just try typing that into Google.

Measuring T the Larmor frequency, 2: Spin Echo Pulse Sequence

Amount of echo goes down with time t due to T2 dephasing.

90

180

Echo

Io

t

t

t

Imax

Imax /e

t

T2

Still coherent

Some dephasing now

z

z

z

y

y

y

x

x

x

A study by 3M used NMR relaxation data to follow polymer drying during solvent evaporation.

A. ERREDE' and RICHARD A. NEWMARK

Journal of Polymer Science: Part A Polymer Chemistry, Vol. 30,11561161 (1992)

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/104048160/PDFSTART

T drying during solvent evaporation.1, T2 can be used to assess crystallinity, glass transitions.

T1 >= T2

Fast-moving nuclei (left side of plot)

relax by real motion. Slow nuclei (crystals)

relax by spin dephasing.

The motion time of the nucleus is

called the correlation time, tc.

http://folk.uio.no/eugen/nmr.html

The DOSY Dog Track: NMR is for the dogs. drying during solvent evaporation.

First, imagine that T2 dephasing is nil.

At the 90 pulse, all the dogs (spins) leave the starting gate and go along the track however far they go.

Then the “come” command (180 pulse) is issued.

Dogs run back as fast as they ran forward, and bark as the cross the line: echo!

Thanks to Frank Blum

Wet Dog Track drying during solvent evaporation.

Suppose now the track is wet, with some lanes being particularly slow.

Dogs come back at the same time!

Unless they cross lanes!

Then, dog that went out on the slow lane might return on a fast lane and be the first to bark. Dog that went out fast can return slow and be the last to bark.

The spread in the time from first bark to last bark contains information about how long it takes dogs to cross tracks from slow to fast: Diffusion!

Gradient pulses: inhomogeneous magnetic field = lanes that are faster or slower (spread of Larmor frequencies).

PFGNMR = DOSY90

180

Echo

t

t

t

The effect of the gradients is to distribute the echo over a wider time, which lowers the maximum echo. The echo amplitude depends on a parameter Q, determined by gradient strength, duration, and timing a bit similar to DLS or FPR.

PFGNMR-DOSY Pros & Cons are faster or slower (spread of Larmor frequencies).

Pros

No labeling!

Chemical specificity anyway (DOSY often keeps the identities of the protons): measure diffusion of everything in a mixture.

Did I mention no labeling?

Works well precisely where DLS doesn’t: small diffusers.

(FPR works for small diffusers—provided the dye doesn’t mess up the molecule being studied).

Data are very quiet.

Effectively no baseline issues.

Did I mention no labeling?

Cons

Slow diffusers: T2 might wipe out your signal before molecules diffuse much.

Does not span the wide range of times and diffusers that DLS or even FPR does.

Struggles with convection issues.

Diffusion can be over a very short range of space.

Is time-limited, not distance limited.

Software for it still sucks.

DLS and DOSY: one rises, one falls with concentration. are faster or slower (spread of Larmor frequencies).

R. Cong, et al. Macromolecules, 2003, 36 (1), pp 204–209

Ernst Von Meerwall &Cornelia Rosu made this result. are faster or slower (spread of Larmor frequencies).

Does PFGNMR/DOSY work for rodlike macromolecules?

Ernst von Meerwall--Akron

Figure 7. Diffusion coefficients plotted against concentration for PSLG 57.5 KDa.

Superstars use DOSY, too. are faster or slower (spread of Larmor frequencies).

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.200703168/abstract

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..