1 / 16

Select Committee on Finance

Public hearing 4 th quarter Provincial Budget Report on conditional grants and capital expenditure. Select Committee on Finance Presentation by Northern Cape’s Department of Agriculture and Land Reform 4 May 2006. Overview. Expenditure summary - overall departmental budget

Download Presentation

Select Committee on Finance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public hearing 4th quarter Provincial Budget Report on conditional grants and capital expenditure Select Committee on Finance Presentation by Northern Cape’s Department of Agriculture and Land Reform 4 May 2006

  2. Overview • Expenditure summary - overall departmental budget • Expenditure summary - conditional grants • Expenditure trends per month • Budget vs. actual • Monitoring and Evaluation • Findings of quality assurance exercise • Challenges • Strengths • Programme of Action • Way forward

  3. Expenditure Summary - overall departmental budget

  4. Expenditure Summary - conditional grants

  5. Expenditure trends per month

  6. Budget vs. actual

  7. Monitoring and Evaluation • Project Coordinating Committee established, meetings held quarterly • Assesses project proposals • Recommends for approval • Assesses and evaluates progress • Project leaders appointed for implementation of various projects • Co-ordinator assigned to coordinate implementation • Quality assurance conducted on CASP, Landcare and Food security projects

  8. Findings of Quality assurance exercise • Projects implemented according to approved business plans • Procurement procedures were followed • The conditional grants bringing meaningful change in the lives of beneficiaries • Able to implement best farming practices • Employment created • Sustainability of the projects dependant on • Other funding for production inputs in order to avoid debts • Implementation of mentorship programme • Conflicts in few projects – must be resolved before expenditure occurs

  9. Challenges • Northern Cape Province struggling to recruit and retain good/relevant scarce skills • Few field officials to provide after-care and implement new projects at the same time • Delays in the implementation and expenditure (only started to spend in the 2nd quarter) as a result of • Lack of Agricultural engineers and Industrial Technicians (competition with industry and recruitment by Private sector) • Too many projects in 2005/6 (29 projects in 2005/6 as compared to 9 projects in 2004/5)

  10. Challenges • Late delivery of material by the appointed suppliers • Few BEE companies participate and in some cases we have identified fronting • Some suppliers not following specifications e.g. delivery on non-SABS approved water pipes and thus, • Project being suspended until supplier delivers appropriate material or • New suppliers being appointed • More demands by other land reform beneficiaries the more they see implementation and changes in the approved projects

  11. Strengths • Department managed to retain certain skills in the last three years • In an attempt to improve on capacity and proper planning we have strengthened partnerships with • Other departments, as an example establishment of the Land Reform Coordinating Committee • To discuss on various land reform projects • To share information on priority areas related to CASP, Landcare, Food Security • DBSA, IDC, ARC, FARM Africa and commercial banks • Ensured that projects are discussed at municipal level with signature of municipal manager before tabled for approval at provincial level

  12. Programme of Action • Submission on project proposals for 2006/07 were finalised in September 2005 • Approval by provincial DoA done by October 2005 • Presentation to national Department of Agriculture done by November 2005 and already approved • Outstanding projects for 2005/06 to be completed by June 2006 • Tender approval for 2006/07 by mid-June 2006 • Implementation for 2006/07 projects to commence end-June 2006

  13. Way forward • Personnel • Departmental organogramme re-aligned based on clear operational units, line of authority and accountability • Complete provincial scare skills analysis and introduction of strategy to attract scarce skills • Appoint more field officers (aim for at least one Extension officer per municipality) • Appropriate deployment of scarce skills • In collaboration with DoA and Provinces, finalise the remuneration scale for scarce skills in order to reduce movement of officials between provinces

  14. Way forward • Projects Planning • Review project proposals in line with ASGI-SA and IDP’s • Already reduced the number of projects for 2006/07 • Ensure that planning is completed prior to April • Tenders for all projects to be approved by end of 2nd quarter • Implement quality assurance to avoid fruitless expenditure

  15. Way forward • Reconciliation will be performed between In Year Monitoring (IYM) and the Infrastructure Model (IRM) • Budgets and expenditure to be captured on BAS under correct items and according to the Appropriation Acts • Provincial Treasury developed a model that will be used to complete the quarterly reports • Distinguish between Infrastructure Maintenance and Capital spending on Infrastructure • Will ensure that the Department and Provincial treasury report on similar infrastructure figures

  16. THANK YOU

More Related