1 / 4

Temple Review Post-Mortem

Temple Review Post-Mortem. 12-15 Aug: Director’s Rev. of all CDF & D Ø Run IIb Projects Prep for DOE (Lehman) review: week of 23 Sep. Reviewed: Technical Aspects / Cost & Schedule Technical Committee Members L.Bauerdick*, F.Forti, D.Marlow*, J.Pilcher**, M.Selen*, H.Sadrozinski, H.Tajima

lesko
Download Presentation

Temple Review Post-Mortem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Temple Review Post-Mortem • 12-15 Aug: Director’s Rev. of all CDF & DØ Run IIb Projects • Prep for DOE (Lehman) review: week of 23 Sep. • Reviewed: Technical Aspects / Cost & Schedule • Technical Committee Members • L.Bauerdick*, F.Forti, D.Marlow*, J.Pilcher**, M.Selen*, H.Sadrozinski, H.Tajima • Review went well on all fronts (thanks!) • New Tevatron Run IIb baseline • L = 4x1032 cm-2s-1 & 396 ns bunch spacing • Documentation basically ok • need more on Basis of Estimate • Technical side also sound. Only 2 recommendations: • “The proponents should try to characterize the performance of the upgraded system with a few global figures of merit. The PAC has emphasized the Higgs detection significance.” • “This task appears ready to baseline.” Hal Evans Run2b L1Cal Meeting: 22-Aug-02

  2. Schedule to Lehman Run2b L1Cal Meeting: 22-Aug-02

  3. What We Need to Do • Fill holes in Schedule Basis of Estimate • see L1Cal Web  Documents  Administratia • Address Technical Committee’s comment • Increase in Higgs sensitivity wrt current trigger • ZH  vvbb (& H   ???) • High Pt trigger menu with rate comparisons • probably too ambitious • Other suggestions ??? • Double-check rate numbers • Compare Data vs MC for current conditions • see Josh Kalk’s numbers • Update TDR with new simulation results • Jet Algorithm new eff. vs rate plot(s) • EM Algorithm nothing here? • Tau Algorithm new eff vs rate plot • ICR nothing here? Run2b L1Cal Meeting: 22-Aug-02

  4. Data vs MC Rates (now) Run2b L1Cal Meeting: 22-Aug-02

More Related