1 / 20

Lecture 1: Introduction to Ethics

Lecture 1: Introduction to Ethics. PHIL 320 (Ethics) – July 1, 2013. Syllabus. Syllabus. Syllabus. Syllabus. What is Ethics?. What is Ethics?. What is Ethics?. Conduct (Actions). There are three moral categories pertaining to actions:

leroy
Download Presentation

Lecture 1: Introduction to Ethics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 1:Introduction to Ethics PHIL 320 (Ethics) – July 1, 2013

  2. Syllabus

  3. Syllabus

  4. Syllabus

  5. Syllabus

  6. What is Ethics?

  7. What is Ethics?

  8. What is Ethics?

  9. Conduct (Actions) • There are three moral categories pertaining to actions: • FORBIDDEN: If you do a forbidden action, you have committed a moral offense (commission). • OBLIGATORY: If you fail to do an obligatory action, you have committed a moral offense (omission). • PERMISSIBLE: One may or may not do permissible actions; no moral judgment will be made about permissible actions. • Every action falls into one (and only one) of these three categories.

  10. Value (Things and/or States of Affairs) • There are three moral categories pertaining to things and/or states of affairs: • INTRINSICALLY GOOD: If something is intrinsically good, it always has moral worth (we esteem it). • INTRINSICALLY BAD: If something is intrinsically bad, it never has moral worth (we are repulsed by it). • VALUE-NEUTRAL: If something is value-neutral, there are occasions in which it has moral worth and other occasions in which it does not. • EXTRINSICALLY GOOD • EXTRINSICALLY BAD • Every thing and/or state of affairs falls into one (and only one) of these three categories.

  11. Character (Persons) • There are three moral categories pertaining to persons: • VIRTUOUS: A virtuous person has a MORALLY GOOD character (set of behaviors, dispositions, and actions). • VICIOUS: A vicious person has a MORALLY BAD character. • MORALLY CHAOTIC: A morally neutral person may behave as if she or he is virtuous or vicious. Although not vicious, such a person is not virtuous, so there is moral concern about such a person. • Every person falls into one (and only one) of these three categories.

  12. What Moral Theories Do • Moral theories explain what makes a given action obligatory, forbidden, or permissible. • Moral theories explain what makes a given thing or state of affairs intrinsically good, intrinsically bad, or value-neutral. If a given thing is value neutral, the moral theory explains what extrinsic situations would make such a thing extrinsically good or extrinsically bad. • Moral theories explain what makes a given person virtuous, vicious, or morally chaotic. Moral theories usually also describe how one can become virtuous and why many “choose” to be morally chaotic. • Moral theories provide metaethical arguments to justify the claims made by the given theory.

  13. Evaluating Moral Theories

  14. Six Criteria for Evaluating Moral Theories • DETERMINACY: Does the moral theory give moral evaluations? • CONSISTENCY: Does the moral theory give the same moral evaluations in sufficiently similar situations? • EXPLANATORY POWER: Does the moral theory provide sufficient metaethical explanation for its moral evaluations? • APPLICABILITY: Is the agent (the moral actor) able to follow the moral theory’s moral recommendations? • INTERNAL SUPPORT: Does the moral theory “square” with the moral beliefs held by the agent? • EXTERNAL SUPPORT: Does the moral theory “square” with other beliefs (philosophical, theological, scientific, aesthetic, etc.) held by the agent?

  15. Three “Non-Starter” Moral Theories MORAL EGOISM • The moral evaluation of actions is to be determined by me (based on my interests and desires). • The moral evaluation of things and states of affairs is to be determined by me (based on my interests and desires). • The moral evaluation of persons is to be determined by me (based on my interests and desires). Are you a moral egoist? Why or why not? Should you be one? Why or why not?

  16. Three “Non-Starter” Moral Theories MORAL (CULTURAL) RELATIVISM • The moral evaluation of actions is to be determined by the culture in which one finds oneself. • The moral evaluation of things and states of affairs is to be determined by the culture in which one finds oneself. • The moral evaluation of people is to be determined by the culture in which one finds oneself. Are you a cultural relativist? Why or why not? Should you be a cultural relativist? Why or why not?

  17. Three “Non-Starter” Moral Theories DIVINE COMMAND THEORY • The moral evaluation of actions is to be determined by our deity (as revealed to us). • The moral evaluation of things and states of affairs is to be determined by our deity (as revealed to us). • The moral evaluation of persons is to be determined by our deity (as revealed to us). Are you a divine command theorist? Why or why not? Should you be a divine command theorist? Why or why not?

  18. The Big Moral Picture

  19. The “Circuit View” of Moral Development

  20. The “Concentric View” of Moral Development

More Related