1 / 30

Crystal Field Theory, Electronic Spectra and MO of Coordination Complexes

Crystal Field Theory, Electronic Spectra and MO of Coordination Complexes. Or why I decided to become an inorganic chemist or Ohhh!!! The Colors!!!. Gemstone owe their color from trace transition-metal ions. Corundum mineral, Al 2 O 3 : Colorless Cr  Al : Ruby Mn  Al: Amethyst

leroy-lawrence
Download Presentation

Crystal Field Theory, Electronic Spectra and MO of Coordination Complexes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Crystal Field Theory, Electronic Spectra and MO of Coordination Complexes Or why I decided to become an inorganic chemist or Ohhh!!! The Colors!!!

  2. Gemstone owe their color from trace transition-metal ions • Corundum mineral, Al2O3: Colorless • Cr  Al : Ruby • Mn  Al: Amethyst • Fe  Al: Topaz • Ti &Co  Al: Sapphire • Beryl mineral, Be3 Al 2Si6O18: Colorless • Cr  Al : Emerald • Fe  Al : Aquamarine

  3. 3 6 6 3 6

  4. d d x2-y2 z2 Do or 10 Dq dxy dyz dxz

  5. d d x2-y2 z2 + 0.6 Do or + 6 Dq - 0.4 Do or - 4 Dq dxy dyz dxz

  6. Let’s Look at 4 Co 3+ complexes: Config. Color of Complex Absorbs [Co(NH3)6]3+d6 [Co(NH3)5(OH2)]3+d6 [Co(NH3)5Br]2+d6 [Co(NH3)5Cl]2+ d6 Greater Splitting 350-400 600-700 600-650 400-500 520-570 Values are in nm 570-600

  7. OTHER QUESTIONS So there are two ways to put the electrons Low Spin High Spin Which form for our 4 cobalt(III) complexes? And why the difference between Cl- and Br-?

  8. R. Tsuchida (1938) noticed a trend in while looking at a series of Cobalt(III) Complexes. With the general formula : [Co(NH3)5X] look at that! The same ones we just looked at…. He arrived a series which illustrates the effect of ligands on Do (10Dq) He called it: The Spectrochemical Series Tsuchida, R. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.1938, 13, 388

  9. The Spectrochemical Series Ligand effect on Do : Small Do I- < Br- < S2- < Cl- < NO3- < F- < OH- < H2O < CH3CN < NH3 < en < bpy < phen < NO2- < PPh3 < CN- < CO Large Do Or more simply : X < O < N < C Metals also effect Do : Mn2+ < Ni2+ < Co2+ < Fe2+ < V2+ < Fe3+ < Co3+ < Mn4+ < Mo3+ < Rh3+ < Ru3+ < Pd2+ < Ir3+ < Pt2+ Fe3+ << Ru3+ Ni2+ << Pd2+ Important consequences result!!!

  10. Strong field ligands Large D Weak field ligands Small D Spectrochemical Series I- < Br- < Cl- < OH- < F- < H2O < NH3 < en < CN- < CO

  11. [Fe(H2O)6]3+ [Ni(H2O)6]2+ [Zn(H2O)6]2+ [Co(H2O)6]2+ [Cu(H2O)6]2+

  12. S=5/2 S=5/2 S=1/2

  13. S = 1 S = 2

  14. Spectrochemical Series

  15. Another important question arises: How does filling electrons into orbitals effect the stability (energy) of the d-orbitals relative to a spherical environment where they are degenerate? We use something called Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE) to answer these questions For a t2gx egy configuration : CFSE = (-0.4 · x + 0.6 · y)Do

  16. So Lets take walk along the d-block…….and calculate the CFSE d1config. [t2g1]: S=1/2 CFSE = –0.4 Do d2config. [t2g2]: S=1 CFSE = –0.8 Do d3 config. [t2g3]: S=3/2 CFSE = -1.2 Do

  17. BUT WHEN YOU GET TO: d4 THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS!!!!! Low Spin High Spin CFSE = -1.6 Do + PCFSE = -0.6 Do When is one preferred over the other ????? It depends. (P 14,900 cm-1 / e- pair) P = DoP > DoP < Do both are equally stabilizedhigh spin (weak field) stabilizedlow spin (weak field) stabilized NOTE: the text uses the symbol P, for spin pairing energy

  18. P , Spin Pairing Energy is composed of two terms • The coulombic repulsion – • This repulsion must be overcome when forcing electrons to occupy the same orbital. As 5-d orbitals are more diffuse than 4-d orbitals which are more diffuse than 3-d orbitals, the pairing energy becomes smaller as you go down a period. As a rule 4d and 5d transition metal complexes are generally low spin! • (b) The loss of exchange energy – • The exchange energy (Hünd’s Rule) is proportional to the number of electrons having parallel spins. The greater this number, the more difficult it becomes to pair electrons. Therefore, d5 (Fe3+ , Mn2+) configurations are most likely to form high spin complexes.

  19. Pairing energy for gaseous 3d metal ions Pairing energies in complexes are likely to be 15-30% lower, due to covalency in the metal-ligand bond. These values are on average 22% too high.

  20. C. K. Jørgensen’s f and g factors Do = f (ligand) · g (metal) Do in 1000 cm-1 (Kkiesers)

  21. Note: Rh3+ and Ir3+ are a lot different than Co3+ g3d < g4d ≤ g5d EXAMPLE: Calculate the Do(10Dq) for [Rh(OH2)6]3+ in cm-1 and nm. for [Rh(pyr)3Cl3]

  22. Tetrahedral Coordination

  23. Dt = 4/9Do All tetrahedral compounds are High Spin

  24. Why do d8 metal compounds often form square planar compounds Thought experiment: Make a square planarcompound by removing two ligands from anoctahedral compound

  25. Ni(II) d8 S = 0 Ni(II) d8 S = 1 Ni(II) d8 S =1

  26. The Energy Levels of d-orbitals in Crystal Fields of Different Symmetries

More Related