Professional Judgment 101. 2008 CASFAA CONFERENCE, ANAHEIM Craig Yamamoto, Director of Financial Aid California State University, Sacramento. Agenda. Professional Judgment Overview Special Circumstances Professional Judgment Prohibitions Professional Judgment Case Studies Best Practices.
2008 CASFAA CONFERENCE, ANAHEIM
Craig Yamamoto, Director of Financial Aid
California State University, Sacramento
Nothing in this part shall be interpreted as limiting the authority of the financial aid administrator, on the basis of adequate documentation, to make adjustments on a case-by-case basis to the cost of attendance or the values of the data items required to calculate the expected student or parent contribution (or both) to allow for treatment of an individual eligible applicant with special circumstances. However, this authority shall not be construed to permit aid administrators to deviate from the contributions expected in the absence of special circumstances. Special circumstances may include tuition expenses at an elementary or secondary school, medical or dental expenses not covered by insurance, unusually high child care costs, recent unemployment of a family member, the number of parents enrolled at least half-time in a degree, certificate, or other program leading to a recognized educational credential at an institution with a program participation agreement under section 487, or other changes in a family’s income, a family’s assets, or a student’s status. Special circumstances shall be conditions that differentiate an individual student from a class of students rather than conditions that exist across a class of students. Adequate documentation for such adjustments shall substantiate such special circumstances of individual students. In addition, nothing in this title shall be interpreted as limiting the authority of the student financial aid administrator in such cases to request and use supplementary information about the financial status or personal circumstances of eligible applicants in selecting recipients and determining the amount of awards under this title. No student or parent shall be charged a fee for collecting, processing, or delivering such supplementary information.
Professional Judgment cannot be used to:
Professional Judgment cannot be used to:
WALL-E will be a junior in 2008-09. He is 21 years old, and for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 award years he was independent because he was married. In October 2007, WALL-E and his wife divorced and WALL-E moved back home with his parents. He and his wife filed a joint federal tax return for 2007. They had a combined income of $25,000 in 2007, $3,000 of which was his income from a Federal Work-Study job. He expects to earn about the same in 2008.
WALL-E’s parents are providing a place for him to live, but they claim that they cannot contribute toward his educational costs since they are also supporting WALL-E’s younger sisters who are both in high school. WALL-E’s parents earned $40,000 in 2007.
EVE is 18 years old and will be a freshman in college in 2008-09. In 2007, her father received a $10,000 bonus for being his company’s top salesperson. In addition, EVE’s mother appeared as a contestant on a TV quiz show and won $5,000, which the family reported on their 2007 tax return. EVE’s father does not expect to receive a bonus in 2008. In fact, his company is downsizing and he could be laid off. Also, the family used EVE’s mother’s winnings to pay off the balance of a car loan. Her parents’ income in 2007 was $60,000. They estimate that their 2008 income will be around $48,000.
Bolt, an independent student, is enrolled in his forth year of an educational program leading to employment in a field with relatively low earnings potential. Bolt has already accumulated over $45,000 in Stafford Loan debt. Would you deny or reduce any subsequent loans?
ED guidance allows schools to exercise PJ to determine that an individual student who does not meet the qualitative and/or quantitative progress standards is maintaining SAP if there are mitigating circumstances in that student’s case.
Belle has completed her junior year at Ballroom College, and she performed poorly. She failed three of her courses, took an incomplete in two, and earned “D” grades in the others. At the end of her freshman year she had a cumulative 1.9 grade point average (GPA).
At the end of Belle’s sophomore year, her GPA was just over a 2.0. Her current GPA no longer meets Ballroom College’s satisfactory academic progress requirements, and she is also deficient by seven credit hours. Early in the school year Belle became pregnant and encountered physical complications which resulted in her missing quite a bit of school. Belle has filed an appeal of her SAP determination.
Thanks for coming and enjoy the Conference!