1 / 16

Victoria Burdett-Coutts* 1 , Richard Wahle 2 , Paul Snelgrove 1 *MSc Candidate

Effects of conspecifics on lobster recruitment – Insights from larval behaviour experiments and multi-scale population monitoring. Victoria Burdett-Coutts* 1 , Richard Wahle 2 , Paul Snelgrove 1 *MSc Candidate 1 Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, Canada

lerato
Download Presentation

Victoria Burdett-Coutts* 1 , Richard Wahle 2 , Paul Snelgrove 1 *MSc Candidate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effects of conspecifics on lobster recruitment – Insights from larval behaviour experiments and multi-scale population monitoring. Victoria Burdett-Coutts*1, Richard Wahle2, Paul Snelgrove1 *MSc Candidate 1 Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, Canada 2 Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Science, West Boothbay Harbor, USA

  2. Effects of conspecifics on lobster recruitment • recruitment drivers at different spatial scales • American lobster • patterns: long term recruitment time series • mechanisms: behavioural experiments • conclusions

  3. Boundary layer turbulence Ocean gyres Swimming ability Habitat selection Vertical horizontal movement Benthic movements/ migrations - spatial scale + 10-2 104 m Recruitment drivers over different spatial scales Passive Transport Pelagic pre-settlement processes Behaviour Benthic post-settlement processes Inter- and Intra-specific interactions Predation, competition

  4. American lobster Homarus americanus

  5. Pelagic 9 mm 11 mm 8 mm Stage II Stage III Stage I • What is the relationship between Young-of-Year (YoY) and older conspecific juvenile (OCJ) density at different spatial scales ? • Does this relationship have a behavioural basis? 3-8 weeks Stage IV 11 mm Benthic Reproductive Phase (RP) Early Benthic Phase (EBP) Adolescent Phase (AP) 5-39mm 40-89mm 90+mm

  6. REGIONS 100 km SITES 10 km QUADRATS 1 m Nested Sampling Design 2002 - 2008 Evaluate patterns & processes operating at different spatial scales Develop hypotheses for mechanisms

  7. 1.8 RI 1.2 0.6 0 3.5 7.0 Regional scale YoY density ( n / m 2 ) OCJ density ( n / m 2 )

  8. 3.0 1.5 0 5.0 10.0 Site scale YoY density ( n / m 2 ) OCJ density ( n / m 2 )

  9. frequency of quad with/without YoY densities of OCJ Quadrat scale YoY density ( n / m 2 ) OCJ density ( n / m 2 )

  10. 0.70 YoY with OCJ observed expected 0.35 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5+ Quadrat scale proportion of quadrats # of OCJ / quadrat

  11. Recruitment drivers over different spatial scales + association between YoY and OCJ at all scales (regional, site, quadrat) • consistent circulation-driven spatial differences in larval supply and settlement • similar habitat requirements, postlarvae select for cobble/boulder habitat • How do stage IV lobsters respond to the presence of older conspecific juveniles during settlement? • Boudreau et al (1993) • + swimming orientation toward conspecifics • Behaviour is cost – benefit • cost • cannibalism, competition • benefit • indicators of suitable habitat • behaviour experiments to identify small scale mechanisms

  12. Experimental design • independent – presence/absence of OCJ • dependent – settlement response of individual stage IV postlarvae • sandy bottom, juvenile containers, YoY shelters • short term and long term exp • 4 minutes - immediate • proportion of time on bottom • 24 hour – long term • recorded at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24h • swimming / on bottom

  13. present absent Short term – 4 minute Proportion of time on bottom t95 = 1.66 P = 0.02 0.5 0.25 Proportion 0 absent n = 46 present n = 48 OCJ

  14. Long term – 24 hour Proportion settled HO≠ HA HO= HA 0.70 proportion 0.35 0 0 6 12 18 24 time (hours)

  15. Preference for habitat Regression Analysis Passive ocean processes ? - spatial scale + 10-2 104 m Conclusions Strong YoY – OCJ association at all spatial scales • effect didn’t persist with time ? •  hierarchical cue? •  other cue variables? • i.e. with / without cobble Initial propensity to settle Behaviour experiments

  16. Acknowledgements • NSERC, Darling Marine Center, Bonne Bay Marine Station, Stonington Zone C hatchery, NOAA / Sea Grant, DFO, CURRA • Rachel Lasley, Hannah Blossom, Charlene Bergeron, Martina Kluge, Don Saunders, Benoit Bruneau

More Related