1 / 58

Pathophysiology of Trauma: Influence on surgical timing and implant selection

Pathophysiology of Trauma: Influence on surgical timing and implant selection. Piotr Blachut MD FRCSC University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada. 23 yr old male skiing accident 4 hours ago isolated, closed injury neurovascular normal. 19 yr old male head on MVA Head injury GCS 6

leora
Download Presentation

Pathophysiology of Trauma: Influence on surgical timing and implant selection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pathophysiology of Trauma:Influence on surgical timing and implant selection Piotr Blachut MD FRCSC University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada

  2. 23 yr old male • skiing accident 4 hours ago • isolated, closed injury • neurovascular normal

  3. 19 yr old male • head on MVA • Head injury • GCS 6 • Multiple fractures

  4. Investigations • CXR - normal • C spine - normal • Pelvis - normal • CT head • cerebral edema • hemispheric hemo. foci • SA blood • L tripod # • CT abdo • normal

  5. 54 yr old male • fall from 25 ft. • no LOC • chest pain / SOB • pelvic / R ankle / L thigh pain • hypotensive • cold

  6. • What do we need to fix? • When should we fix it? • How should we fix it?

  7. Priorities • Life threatening • Limb threatening • Function threatening

  8. Priorities • Life threatening • Limb threatening • Function threatening - pelvic hemorrhage

  9. Priorities • Life threatening • Limb threatening • Function threatening - pelvic hemorrhage -vascular injury - compartment syndrome - open fracture - irreducible dislocation

  10. Priorities • Life threatening • Limb threatening • Function threatening - pelvic hemorrhage -vascular injury - compartment syndrome - open fracture - irreducible dislocation - articular fracture - distal extremity frac.

  11. Priorities • Life threatening • Limb threatening • Function threatening - pelvic hemorrhage -vascular injury - compartment syndrome - open fracture - irreducible dislocation - articular fracture - distal extremity frac. Long bone fracture ?

  12. War experiences • Splintage • Early evacuation • Early definitive treatment Thomas splint

  13. 1960’s & 1970’s System of operative fracture stabilization first applied to isolated injuries later application to polytrauma Improvement in anesthesia / critical care management

  14. Eric Riska, Finland 1977 • 47 pts. • multiple trauma • all long bone fractures fixed with stable fixation • 1 death (80 y.o.)

  15. Vivoda, Meek, 1978 • 71 pts., all multiple trauma, all ICU • two groups • no difference in AGE or ISS • Mortality CONSERVATIVE 14/49 (28.5%) OPERATIVE …… 1/22 (4.5%) ( 5:1 ratio)

  16. 1980’s Early Total Care (ETC) fracture stabilization (especially long bone fracture within 24 hrs) • Riska 1982  FES • Goris 1982 stabilization -  ventilation • Johnson 1985 1/5 rate of ARDS • Border 1/5 rate “pulm. septic state”

  17. 1980’s Cause of complications with delayed stabilization • fat embolism syndrome • supine position -> atelectasis -> sepsis •  narcotic use • inflammatory mediator release from hematoma / soft tissue injury Seibel, Ann Surg 1985

  18. 1980’s Early Total Care (ETC) • Bone et al., Dallas 1989 • Prospective randomized study • Early vs. late femoral nailing •  pulmonary complications •  ICU length of stay •  hospital costs

  19. 1980’s • reamed IM nailing the standard of care for femoral shaft fractures • known marrow embolization

  20. 1990’s  Three types of patients: • Isolated injuries • Multiple fractures • Multiple system Does ETC apply to all ?

  21. 1990’s  Three types of patients: • Isolated injuries • Multiple fractures • Multiple system Does ETC apply to all ?

  22. 1990’s  • In severely injured patient • significant chest injury • significant head injury • Is there a detrimental effect of added major surgery •  stress •  blood loss • fluid shifts

  23. 1990’s  • How show we fix it?

  24. 1990’s  • CHEST INJURY

  25. Pape, Hannover,1993 • pts with pulmonary contusion and early reamed femoral nail • increase in ARDS and death • ? unreamed femoral nail / delayed nail • ? femur group sicker

  26. Charash, 1994 • replicated Pape study • without chest trauma pulmonary complications lower in early fixation group (10% VS 38%) • with severe chest trauma pulmonary complications lower in early fixation group ( 16% VS 56%)

  27. Bosse et al, 1997 • institution randomized series • early plating vs. early IM nailing • 453 patients • no ARDS, PE, MOF, pneumonia or death • compared to plating or chest injury alone

  28. Dunham et al., 2001 Practice Management Guidelines for the Optimal Timing of Long-Bone Fracture Stabilization in Polytrauma Patients: The EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group • There is no compelling evidence that early long-bone stabilization in patients with chest injury either enhances or worsens outcome.

  29. 1990’s  • HEAD INJURY

  30. Head injury • Secondary brain injury in severe head injury if exposed to: • hypotension • hypoxemia • increased ICP (intercranial pressure) • reduced CPP (cerebral perfusion pressure)

  31. Head injury • Early Fracture Fixation May Be Deleterious After Head Injury Jaicks RR, Cohn SM, Moller BA, J Trauma 42(1):1-6, 1997 EarlyDelayed 19 14  fluid requirement  neuro complic.  hypoxia intra op  ICU stay  hypotension  hospital stay  GCS on discharge

  32. Head injury EARLY FIXATION • Hofman 1991 • Poole 1992 • McKee 1997 • Starr 1998 • Smith 2000 • Brundage 2002 • DELAYED FIXATION • Jaicks 1997 • Townsend 1998 All retrospective studies !!!

  33. Head injury • DELAYED FIXATION •  fluid requirement • hypoxia EARLY FIXATION •  length of stay •  mortality •  pulm. complic neuro outcome ? All retrospective studies !!!

  34. Dunham, 2001 • Practice Management Guidelines for the Optimal Timing of Long-Bone Fracture Stabilization in Polytrauma Patients: The EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group • There is no compelling evidence that early long-bone stabilization in mild, moderate, or severe brain injured patients either enhances or worsens outcome.

  35. Evolving concepts of pathophysiology • course after severe blunt trauma dependant on: • initial injury ( “first hit” ) • individual biologic response • type of treatment ( “second hit” )

  36. Biological response • Prehospital • ER • ICU • ETC • Intermediate • Damage control Clinical outcome: ARDS, MOF, SIRS • Stable • Borderline • Unstable • In extremis 1st HIT Therapy: 2nd HIT Kellam 2003

  37. 2 nd HIT • Second hit from the management of skeletal injuries is under the control of the surgeon • Determine the patients ability to withstand a second hit from trauma surgery • How to minimize the second hit 

  38. “Borderline Patient” • Polytrauma +ISS>20 + thoracic trauma (AIS>2) • Polytrauma + abdominal/pelvic trauma and hemodynamic shock (initial BP< 90 mmHg) • ISS >40 • Bilateral lung contusions on x-ray • Initial mean pulmonary arterial pressure >24mmHg • Pulmonary artery pressure increase during IM nailing > 6mmHG

  39. Factors associated with BAD outcome • Unstable difficult resuscitation • Coagulopathy (platelets<90,000) • Hypothermia (<32°C) • Shock + 25 units blood • Head Injury: GCS < 8, bleeding, edema

  40. 1990’s & 2000’s Damage control surgery Damage control orthopaedic surgery (DCO)

  41. Damage control orthopaedic surgery Non- operative treatment ≠

  42. Priorities • Life threatening • Limb threatening • Function threatening - pelvic hemorrhage -vascular injury - compartment syndrome - open fracture - irreducible dislocation - articular fracture - distal extremity frac.

  43. Damage control orthopaedic surgery Avoid: • excessive fluid shifts • hypothermia • coagulopathy • pulmonary compromise • Provide stability: • pain control •  inflammatory • mediator release •  fat embolism •  mobilization

  44. Damage control orthopaedic surgery • rapid external fixation • delayed definitive fixation

  45. Damage control orthopaedic surgery Timing of secondary surgery • 2-4 days  multiple organ failure  inflammatory markers • 6-8 days Pape et al, 2001

  46. Damage control orthopaedic surgery •  risk of local complications • infection • poorer joint reconstruction • not borne out in clinical experience (so far) • Scalea, 2000 • Nowotarski 2000

  47. ETC versus DCO Pape et al., J Trauma, 2002 • prospective randomized multicentre series • 17 versus 18 patients • early IM nailing -> sustained inflammatory response ( IL-6) • no clinical difference (complication rate / LOS)

More Related