1 / 16

Assessment of the Organizational Safety Culture of Clackamas County Fire District #1

Assessment of the Organizational Safety Culture of Clackamas County Fire District #1. By Kenneth Horn EMPA Candidate. Background. Firefighter deaths and injuries in the United States Fire service continue to be problematic.

leone
Download Presentation

Assessment of the Organizational Safety Culture of Clackamas County Fire District #1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessment of the Organizational Safety Culture of Clackamas County Fire District #1 By Kenneth Horn EMPA Candidate

  2. Background • Firefighter deaths and injuries in the United States Fire service continue to be problematic. • Since 2005 Firefighter deaths per 1000 fires has increased 37% (U.S. Fire Administration,2009) • CCFD1 16 cases involving FF injuries resulting in 114 shifts missed and approximately $114,000.00 in overtime

  3. Literature Review • Literature reviewed from other “high-risk” industries including: Aviation, Nuclear Power, Mining, and Off-Shore Drilling. • Fire Service Studies by Alan Williams and William Pessemier. • Literature review supporting hypotheses on sub-groups, efficiency, and individual accountability.

  4. Purpose “Define and advocate the need for a cultural change within the fire service relating to safety; incorporating leadership, supervision, management, accountability, and personal responsibility” -Everyone Goes Home Initiative Program, 2004

  5. Purpose of study

  6. Purpose • Time to move away from Lagging Indicators and incorporate Leading Indicators. • Reduce Injuries, save lives, and reduce costs associated with injuries. • Provide more tools in the toolbox of Chief and Company Officers.

  7. Objectives • Identify the make-up of the organizational safety culture within CCFD#1. • Determine if there are identifiable sub-groups related to safety. • Determine if Fire Fighters value efficiency over safety. • Determine if Fire Fighters value individual accountability over safety.

  8. The Project • Safety Cultural Survey sent to all members of the Department. • Descriptive methods used to analyze the collected data assessing the organizational “attitude” towards safety. • Follow-up interviews to capture qualitative data.

  9. Outcome • Identifiable sub groups can be found within the organization. • Firefighters tend tovalue efficiency over safety. • The results of the survey do not support that Fire Fighters will value individual accountability over safety… however. • Additional research in needed.

  10. Significance The National Fire Fighters Foundation and the Public Entity Risk Institute reports that: “the company officer play THE critical role in defining on a day-to-day basis the nature of the organizational safety culture in a fire department”

  11. Significance • In the CNN interviews, the workers described a corporate culture of cutting staff and ignoring warning signs ahead of the blast. They said BP routinely cut corners and pushed ahead despite concerns about safety. • The rig survivors also said it was always understood that you could get fired if you raised safety concerns that might delay drilling. Some co-workers had been fired for speaking out, they said. • Safety was "almost used as a crutch by the company," Barron said. • "It's like they used it against us --the safety policies -- you know, to their advantage.

  12. Implications of Project • Developed the competencies address complicated issues • Provide tools and information to leaders within the organization to develop and improve safety related policies • Provide tools for company officers to improve safety related practices

  13. Acknowledgements • A Big Thanks to: • Dr. Masami Nishishiba • Dr. Matt Jones • All Faculty members

  14. Thanks to the Cohort!

  15. …and a big thanks to my family

More Related